<<
The pear shape goes against the accepted symmetry-based model, which
accounts for three shapes of atomic nuclei: spherical, discus, and football.
>>
A more plausible model for matter is needed. Working to conform our present
politically correct notions to the observations just results in more
compromises in terms of behavior of the ‘particles’ we assume make up atomic to
molecular scale matter. It’s far more likely that the ecology of atoms
YES! That is the article which prompted my starting this thread!
You all should read it! Apparently Axil eventually did…
It seems to describes just the kind of energy transfer into the lattice instead
of ejecting high-E particles, BUT ONLY AT A VERY SPECIFIC/NARROW energy
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-26-2016-lenr-dispute-and-some-info.html
peter--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Whatever mechanism is needed to transfer nuclear energy via phonons vs photons
must be able to move a great deal of such energy over a considerable distance
to ‘cool’ the NAE.
To do this without radiation requires that the range of the nuclear force be
extended beyond that of the
Was this article cited here yet as support for a magic reaction frequency?
http://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html
*Laser pulses help scientists tease apart complex electron interactions*
"We see a very strong and peculiar interaction between the excited
Whatever mechanism is needed to transfer nuclear energy via phonons vs photons
must be able to move a great deal of such energy over a considerable distance
to ‘cool’ the NAE.
To do this without radiation requires that the range of the nuclear force be
extended beyond that of the
7 matches
Mail list logo
