RE: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Jones- The Gupta and Jacobs patent was not missed by R. Mills. Look at the references cited at the end of the 1991 patent document. Randy was quick to pick up on the technology shortly after the patent lapsed in 1999. It may be that Gupta and Jacobs were bought out by somebody or the

[Vo]:oral blanko

2017-04-21 Thread Frank Znidarsic
https://moneymorning.com/acq/lithium/how-this-new-fuel-source-is-set-to-create-billions-in-new-wealth-for-investors?iris=659880=no=yes=ron-aol-aol

[Vo]:Google translation of an electrochemistry paper

2017-04-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
A researcher asked me to translate two papers from Japanese into English: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsms1963/49/11/49_11_1242/_article https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsms1963/50/9/50_9_999/_article The first one is: (J. Soc. Mat. Sci., Japan), Vol.49, No. 11, pp. 1242-1248,

Re: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread Terry Blanton
It was the rush to publish that likely resulted in so many failed attempts at replication and the early dismissal of CF. Had F been allowed to follow the normal process of peer review of a well thought out experimental paper explaining the importance of proper materials and loading times, we

Re: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: I thought F testified before Congress that it was Jones' work which > caused the University to press F to go to press with their findings early. > Yup. That's what they told me & Gene Mallove. Martin said they wanted to keep it secret another 5 years, as

Re: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread Jones Beene
The ironic thing, given the broad and specific coverage of Gupta's claims - is that he could have demanded royalties from anyone who used palladium based electrolysis with a lithium electrolyte for financial gain. That would possibly include P if they had made anything on it - but in the end,

Re: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: That would be consistent with actions to poo-poo the Pd D ideas by the > military- industrial complex. > Which never happens. The military has been the best and most generous supporter of cold fusion from day one. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Google translation of an electrochemistry paper

2017-04-21 Thread Daniel Rocha
Translations from and to English are good. Not so much to other languages.In any case, I also cheat :-) One thing I miss it is that they should provide an OCR, so that I could read letters in photographs, graphs and comics (korean, japanese, chinese, french or whatever). It would also boost

[Vo]:LENR- the flowmeter's J'accuse!

2017-04-21 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-21-2017-lenr- flowmeters-jaccuse.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:The Gupta Patent of early 1989

2017-04-21 Thread Terry Blanton
I thought F testified before Congress that it was Jones' work which caused the University to press F to go to press with their findings early. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:11 AM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Jones- > > > > The Gupta and Jacobs patent was not missed

Re: [Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

2017-04-21 Thread John Berry
Oh wow,everyone get excited, there is a tiny deviation in the production of muons over electrons even though there should be due to their energy but it's a bit larger than that! And as Muons die quickly, they aren't even useful. This piece gives the view that physics is pretty much complete and

[Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

2017-04-21 Thread Kevin O'Malley
CERN Declares War On The Standard Model Article Updated: 20 Apr , 2017by Matt Williams https://www.universetoday.com/135091/cern-declares-war-standard-model/ Ever since the

Re: [Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

2017-04-21 Thread Axil Axil
DN(0) →···→···→ K± → π± → μ± → e± Nx4x938MeV →···→···→ 493MeV → 139MeV → 105MeV → 0. 511MeV Holmlid's meson particle decay chain. "The origin of the particle signals observed here is clearly laser-induced nuclear processes in H(0). The first step is the laser-induced transfer of the H2(0) pairs

Re: [Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

2017-04-21 Thread Kevin O'Malley
2 things stand out about this article: The unbalanced formation of muons in testing the decay of B0 mesons, the team found that the decay process produced muons with less frequency. Something about this rings a bell with some LENR results but I can't find it. Secondly, the investigation of