Hi,
Does anyone know of a SIMS analysis run on either pure deuterium or a metal
deuteride, where *only* the deuteride went in, but some Hydrogen came out?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Competition (capitalism) provides the motivation,
Cooperation
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:07:07 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Hi,
Does anyone know of a SIMS analysis run on either pure deuterium or a metal
deuteride, where *only* the deuteride went in, but some Hydrogen came out?
[snip]
I meant but some protium came out.
Regards,
Hi Robin, I know of no such analysis but I am intrigued by your question
SIMS analysis run on either pure deuterium
In which form ? Can one run a SIMS analysis on a gas?
where *only* the deuteride went in, but some H (1H) came out?
You mean HD goes into the metal and H comes out?
Michel
I am not pressing you for an answer Ed, but I Googled for your book soon to be
published you advertised here the other day: The Science of Low Energy Nuclear
Reaction and found its home page here:
http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/6425.html
It says Pub. date: Scheduled Fall 2007, hopefully
On 3/15/2007, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zachary Wrote..
Have you ever talked with any of the TExas AM boys working on NASA's
vortex phase separator?
No I have not. Tell me something about it or the people involved.
The project director is Fred Best, who is a nuclear engineer with
Harry Veeder wrote:-
Perhaps the critical temperature of a given NAE is more like temperature
range. When the NAE is below a certain temperature it is too cold for cold
fusion, and when it is above a certain temperature it is too hot for cold
fusion
If you've been around since the beginning
Howdy Zac,
The links you gave for Texas AM research in two phase separation shows that
Aggies are beginning to learn how to attract research money... err.. well..
maybe after they learn how to spell seperate grin.
I don't know any of these guys but if you do, you may mention they can
- Original Message -
From: Nick Palmer
To: Vortex-L
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer
...
Oh BTW Ed, Michel is pointing out that the palladium itself is not
electrolysed, although this is what the title
Harry Veeder wrote:
Cold fusion does not seem to require the temperatures and pressures of hot
fusion, but is an NAE enough?
Well, higher temperatures do promote the reaction. Fleischmann and
Pons used to trigger a boil off reaction by heating up the cell
rapidly with a pulse of joule
Michel, electrolysis is a process. When I said palladium was
electrolyzed, I'm saying that palladium was subjected to the process of
electrolysis. This is a common usage that I don't think is important
enough to debate.
Ed
Michel Jullian wrote:
I am not pressing you for an answer Ed, but I
The O6 molecular isomer is also-known-as diozone - which to the
word-phreak, has a peculiar negative connotation - kind of like being
caught between the death-zone and the outer ozone layer of Chem-E
stoners ... g... and/or other assorted slackers:
http://imdb.com/title/tt0102943/
...(for
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:22:54 +0100:
Hi Michel,
Hi Robin, I know of no such analysis but I am intrigued by your question
SIMS analysis run on either pure deuterium
In which form ? Can one run a SIMS analysis on a gas?
where *only* the deuteride went in,
Say what??? Who's buying whom here?
And who is buying it? New Energy Times investigates. March 18.
Er, D2 is not a deuteride is it? That's why I thought you meant HD (hydrogen
deuteride).
Anyway so you mean molecular deuterium D2 goes into e.g. the palladium (thus
forming a palladium deuteride PdD), and H comes out? By which mechanism?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:19:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
Please note that the -285.83 kJ/mol reaction enthalpy this calculation is
based on is for STP conditions 1atm and 25°C, so for different conditions e.g.
1atm and 100°C the appropriate reaction enthalpy must be
For all the big-water (Graneau) water-arc aficionados in Volandia...
...ever have that sudden urge to go out and build yourself a railgun? I
know I do ;-)
[Note to MIB - this particular symbol: ;-) in email messages, means
that the writer intended the comment as a joke, more or less]
Thanks Robin. I think the H2O formation enthalpy figure I quoted is for 1 atm
and 25°C as I wrote (someone kindly confirm), but indeed those conditions are
not STP (which is 1atm and 0°C as you say), my mistake.
Replace 'STP' by 'reference'.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:24:40 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
Er, D2 is not a deuteride is it? That's why I thought you meant HD (hydrogen
deuteride).
Anyway so you mean molecular deuterium D2 goes into e.g. the palladium (thus
forming a palladium deuteride PdD), and H
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:54:17 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
My biggest question for using a hybrid compulsator to drive a Graneau
style water-arc explosion, perhaps repetitively in a hybrid-hybrid
turbine generator: Do you get the same energy anomaly (COP=2) with HOOH
as
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Does one of you have a website about the Aether?
I have a web site on the Aether Physics Model at www.16pi2.com
Thanks for the info David. I forwarded your info to Hal Puthoff,
www.earthtech.org , perhaps he will comment on your theories.
Our
20 matches
Mail list logo
