On Jan 24, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
Horace:
I hope I didn't delete it...
In order to not confuse people, if I'm really only responding to a
sentence or two out of a lengthy posting, I will delete much of the
extraneous material.. and I will try to remember to include 'snip'
From Mark
Now sing along with me... from that ol' folk song...
Where have all the neutrons gone...
I did start singing. ;-)
' ...perhaps into heavy fermions? ;-)
This from the comment section of the Knol page on CF...
Consider heavy fermion superconductors
The August 2009 issue of
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... and the others must protect their phoney baloney jobs ...
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
The scientists who agreed to participate in the public demo, most certainly
See:
http://ingandrearossi.com/
From: Mark Iverson
This from the comment section of the Knol page on CF...
Consider heavy fermion superconductors
The August 2009 issue of Scientific American, pg 66 at left margin,
describes a 1979 discovery: Heavy-fermion superconductors such as uranium
platinum (UPt3) are remarkable by
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:19 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Harumph!
Don't worry Terry. I think many got it.
Whew, thank Ford! Otherwise it sounds like the rantings of a lunatic.
T
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi%20and%20Bianchini%20Reports.pdf
returns a
403 Forbidden code.
It's still available on Jed's site. I wonder if they pulled it intentionally?
T
Let me organize the previous chain of thought
First one detail gold is an excellent spillover catalyst, plus it is also
specifically mentioned in the old patent.
It is seldom used as a catalyst due to cost but that is not relevant at this
point, since spillover catalysts work best in
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://ingandrearossi.com/
From the page Google translates as Rebirth:
, While maintaining professional relations with the United States,
and started working with LTI (Leonardo Technology Incorporated), a
Anyone for Anyons?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anyon
Harry
This can be read in conjunction with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2DEG
and the Lawandy paper, to understand that hydrogen spillover is probably in
the class of 2D reactions, at the outset. There could easily be a strong
topological basis for robust LENR.
Interfacial layers, boundary
Greetings Vortex,
I have accessed the Levi report by using the series of links at
http://www.infinite-energy.com there is a download at January 15th link at
the Nucleur Journal.
Here is a cut ad pasted that worked today:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Let me organize the previous chain of thought …
First one detail – gold is an excellent spillover catalyst, plus it
is also specifically mentioned in the old patent.
It is seldom used as a catalyst due to cost but that is not
relevant at
See:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Cold-fusion-turns-hot-city-to-host-meet-/articleshow/7357005.cms
Ron Kita wrote:
I have accessed the Levi report by using the series of links at
http://www.infinite-energy.com there is a download at January 15th link at
the Nucleur Journal.
A copy is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdf
The English in this version is improved by me.
-
From Jed:
See:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Cold-fusion-turns-hot-city-to-host-meet-/articleshow/7357005.cms
Excerpt:
According to Dr M Srinivasan, chairman of the organizing
committee, the conference will deal with the recent
breakthrough in cold fusion theory
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
20 KW? Oh, what the hey. What's +/- 10 KW - just between you-n-me.
KiloWatts are smaller in India. ;-)
T
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi%20and%20Bianchini%20Reports.pdf
returns a
403 Forbidden code.
Momentary glitch, probably. It seems to be back now:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi%20and%20Bianchini%20Reports.pdf
If it does not
I'll bet their server was overwhelmed. that happens occasionally at
LENR-CANR.org. It happens when people use a program such as Web Reaper and
they open ~20 channels (meaning they try to download 20 papers in the time
over high-speed connection).
We are still getting a lot of traffic at
From: Horace Heffner
* Also of possible interest is that my rough computation for the deflated
state up quark:
* http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionUpQuark.pdf
* shows that the deflated state electrons have a gamma of 36,000, and mass
of 3.3 x10^-26 kg, more than the rest
As noted, the gadget is reported as 20 kW in the Times of India. I think
Rossi said it is, and my guess is that it can put out 20 kW. It wasn't
running at full performance, and the calorimetry is probably missing a
lot of the heat, even though they wrapped insulation around the machine.
In
Final tally of downloads for yesterday:
01/14/2011 597
01/15/2011 447
01/16/2011 732
01/17/2011 1,162
01/18/2011 1,325
01/19/2011 1,449
01/20/2011 1,952
01/21/2011 1,510
01/22/2011 1,467
01/23/2011 1,696
01/24/2011 4,525
Today so far: 2,046 as of 14:56 EST
- Jed
Terry Blanton wrote:
I don't mean to be too harsh.
Jed, don't misunderstand. My comments were directed at the same
people you directed comments.
I didn't mean you any-who.
Dr. Levi has too much to lose to
participate in a hoax. He stands to profit nothing from a hoax.
I agree. If
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
In his blog, Rossi told me that the 1 MW reactor will be 1 MW thermal
output. I do not know if it will be for process steam or electricity. My
guess is steam, because it would cost a whole lot more to make an
electric generator and you need high
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Prediction – if helium is found it will be mostly 3He. Heck, if that turns
out to be true, then the value of the byproduct could pay for everything.
Wait a minute. You're saying that if we find 3He as a byproduct of
cold
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet their server was overwhelmed.
That's probably it. I'm getting code 403 consistently. I tried
clearing my cache just to be sure.
T
The 1 MW reactor is composed of 125 10KW units
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 2:52:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Times of India reports on ICCF16 and Rossi
As noted, the gadget is reported as 20 kW in the
On 01/25/2011 02:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:* Horace Heffner
Ø Also of possible interest is that my rough computation for the
deflated state up quark:
Ø http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionUpQuark.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/%7Ehheffner/FusionUpQuark.pdf
Ø
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:48:33 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks for the lead, Robin... Have you got a link to it?
I probably already downloaded it... Just haven't been able to read it yet!
-Mark
You might find a lead here:- http://www.padrak.com/ine/BASS.html#BASS_1
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
There is little doubt that Rossi is being
pushed up to the MW range by the Greek investors - who probably want it for
ocean shipping. That may be overly ambitious at the start.
I do not know about being pushed. It seems he is enthusiastic about doing
Jed
In 1990 I have been working with a self deviced electromagnet which was
powered by 25 ( and later 50) batteries of 12 V in parallel with a total
current of 1000 A continously to generate a very electric strong magnetic
field to detect possible neutron emission from an electrolytic
Robin:
I was quoting from the comment section of the Knol page on CF...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Where have all the neutrons gone...
In reply to
Awkshully, a prime future use for 3-He could be as a conduit for ZPE,
somewhat in the way of Horace's paper, although it is not impossible that an
improved version of hot fusion will also compete with Ni-H. 3-He is also a
simple composite molecular boson.
Imagine ICF using the Miley system with
On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Horace Heffner
Ø Also of possible interest is that my rough computation for the
deflated state up quark:
Ø http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionUpQuark.pdf
Ø shows that the deflated state electrons have a gamma of 36,000,
Oops.
3-He is also a simple composite molecular boson.
Not true. There is not an integer spin.
Jed sez:
...
See? This is an example of wild guessing and unfounded speculation. This is
what I was complaining about before, in the thread, Your suspicion is not
proof there is a problem. BUT, it would only be a problem if I were to make
this back-of-the-envelope calculation, then jump to
P.J van Noorden pjvan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
. . . so the temperature rose to the boilingpoint. The steam escaped very
violently from the exit of the coil. The sound was as if explosions took
place.
Therefore you can understand that I am somewhat critical about the
relative quiet experiment I
Hi
We know that mean root square speed in specific perpendicular directions is
like this
Vrms^2 = 3 Vrmx_x^2 = 3 Vrmx_y^2 = 3 Vrmx_z^2
What is the relation for the mean linear speed Vavg in specific directions?
Could it be like this, that the components can be vector summarized to get
the
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
and he has also related to me that on more than one occasion, the
'firing' of the Z-pinch machine has resulted in anomalous energy that
could not be explained, and instruments all seemed to be working
properly... don't think they ever tracked it down
I mentioned this fellow who thinks that McKubre does not know how to measure
direct current electricity. This is in an exchange with long-suffering Ed
Storms, here:
http://knol.google.com/k/jed-rothwell/cold-fusion/2zjj2hvn3qzi5/2#comment-2zjj2hvn3qzi5.wwzfkv
I added a few messages. I should
You have to expand the 9 comments below this comment to see what I mean:
http://knol.google.com/k/jed-rothwell/cold-fusion/2zjj2hvn3qzi5/2#comment-2zjj2hvn3qzi5.wwzfkv
- Jed
On 01/25/2011 06:43 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Hi
We know that mean root square speed in specific perpendicular
directions is like this
Vrms^2 = 3 Vrmx_x^2 = 3 Vrmx_y^2 = 3 Vrmx_z^2
What is the relation for the mean linear speed Vavg in specific
directions?
Could it be like this, that
Jed,
that person writes, With regard to my own current area of research, what's
interesting to me about the cold fusion story is the comparison of the beliefs
and practices of the two camps (believers vs. skeptics) and their associated
affective emotional states.
It seems to be suspicion
I meant to sayIt seems to me suspicion as proof stems from a beliefthat the
experiment is flawed or the interpretation of the experiment is just wrong so
these kinds of skeptics are as much believers as the cold fusion believers.
Harry
From: Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com
To:
44 matches
Mail list logo
