Yeah, your right. What was I thinking??
My boyancy argument is just wrong. Thank's for straightening that out to me.
(And, darn it, don't I look stupid.)
As such, I can't see any way to solidly determine if the bulk of the liquid
water exits the device suspended in vapor, or simply pours out
Joshua Cude, and other astute observerse:
We could model an exothermic reactions with unlimited (over the course of
the experiment) heat generation as a simple bump function.
A simple bump function for this is p = p_o / {1+[(T-T_o)/T_w]^2 }.
At T=T_o the power, p is maximal.
T_w is the
Very well said. There is no obvective measuring stick to measure burden.
I was attempting to reveil the hidden hypocracy in the burden of proof
argument.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Essentially, burden is a social construct, it doesn't exist
No comments??
If you don't know where to find the report by Dr. G. Levi look here,
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/H-Ni_Fusion/join
This Yahoo group has become my own personal blog and rant about this fiasco.
I have included first-hand reports and video evidence under the Files and
Links
Hello group,
Here is my translation of several tidbits in a thread in the Italian web
forum energeticambiente.it where Roy Virgilio (nicknamed here eroyka. He
attended Saturday's LENR talk in Viareggio) will report as time passes
news about Piantelli's work. I recommend to bookmark that page
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Here is my translation of several tidbits in a thread in the Italian
web forum energeticambiente.it where Roy Virgilio (nicknamed here
eroyka. He attended Saturday's LENR talk in Viareggio) will report as
time passes news about Piantelli's work.
Thanks
Jed sez:
...
Maybe Rossi has nothing to do with it, and Piantelli happened to achieve
commercial-level success now, and he would have gone public even without
Rossi.
In a pig's eye. ;-)
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
From Akira translation of thread by Roy Virgilio who attended Saturday's LENR
talk in Viareggio
[snip] Piantelli doesn't use catalysts, at least in the term's literal
meaning. His technology is based mainly on nickel preparation, i.e.
powder geometry/size and deposition size (in a multilayered
And perhaps, as Peter and I have discussed, there is no Rossi magic
sauce after all . . . it's all in the size, shape, cleansing, pressure
and temperature of the elements involved.
T
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
- On a theoretical perspective (Piantelli has a mathematical theory which
doesn't require exotic reactions, but that can be explained by current
physical laws and mathematics) protons of 6-7 Mev energy have been
Actually Piantelli has at least 15 publications in which he is the main
leading/author the others being Focardi and analyticians.
And his two patents WO 1995/20816 and WO 2010/058288
are very professionally written. (two new patents coming soon)
He had self-sustaining cells years ago. Being a
On 2011-07-25 12:15, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Short URL: http://goo.gl/H4vDd
(http://www.energeticambiente.it/sistemi-idrogeno-nikel/14742857-novita-cella-piantelli.html)
More tidbits:
- The older reactivated cells that are being tested right now show
small excess heat (2-3 times the input
As a parting shot, so to speak - let me chime in with a couple of comments
on Fran's behalf - and others who see cavity-QED as the best answer to
understanding the thermal gain in Ni-H (as opposed to the other proposed
transmutation reactions, including Piantelli, Focardi etc. since they should
Jones,
Thanks for the support, I agree with many of your suggestions for
non-nuclear and sub nuclear reactions. My only goal is to have mainstream
re-consider a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect where longer
wavelengths are actually subject to Lorentzian contraction not
At 12:28 PM 7/24/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
The 2011 Cold Fusion/Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions Colloquium
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Part I
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/LANR2011Colloq.pdf
Is it just me ... or is there an Elephant in the room?
At 10:55 AM 7/22/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Damon Craig
mailto:decra...@gmail.comdecra...@gmail.com wrote:
The key word is boyancy. What is the densest thing you have ever
seen floating in a vapor of steam, Joshua?
I'll answer that, I've never seen anything
At 02:26 PM 7/22/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think someone here referred to the idea that the device is a sort
of energy amplifier. That is, something that uses a flow of energy
to tap into a source of energy and extract it at rate depending on
input power. I do not think any cold fusion
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually Piantelli has at least 15 publications in which he is the main
leading/author the others being Focardi and analyticians.
And his two patents WO 1995/20816 and WO 2010/058288
are very professionally written. (two new patents coming soon)
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Is it just me ... or is there an Elephant in the room?
It's a selective attention test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
T
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
With the electrochemical cells, all else being equal, output is somewhat
proportional to input because high input boosts high loading which in turn
boosts the heat. But I would not call that amplification.
This is classic amplification. A
There are more reasons for the low profile:
- very hard working;
- doing advanced and very important cancer research, he has offered to help
Scott Chubb- but when we knew about Scott illness it was too late;
- health problems (asthma):
- rather passive knowledge of the English language;
-
2011/7/25 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
This is classic amplification. A small current controls a larger current. A
small heat controls a larger heat. This works with the E-cat (if we accept
that there is excess heat), as long as it is operated in the controllable
region. That
At 02:26 PM 7/25/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
With the electrochemical cells, all else being equal, output is
somewhat proportional to input because high input boosts high
loading which in turn boosts the heat. But I
At 11:20 AM 7/25/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo
I counted 11 passes ... but .. umm ... NO !
24 matches
Mail list logo
