Re: Aw: [Vo]:God Revealed Tomorrow?

2011-12-13 Thread noone noone
Of course they are not like Rossi. They have not designed a paradigm shifting technology. Instead, they are just searching for some particle, with no idea of how to make it into a technology. By the way, Rossi has tested his device over and over again. He is satisfied the technology works and

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread noone noone
I am all for vertical agriculture, but I am totally opposed to a global basic income. I do not support socialism or communism. With cold fusion technology, the price of everything will go down. Even a job at McDonalds will be capable of paying for a nice house, nice cars, etc. We can have a

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread noone noone
I can't wait until the cost of everything has went down dramatically. I think combining cold fusion with robotics and nanotechnology could allow us to end up in a world where there is no such thing as scarcity. Everything could be dirt cheap, and a simple part-time job would allow someone to

[Vo]:Cold Fusion and the 2012 Election Cycle

2011-12-13 Thread noone noone
I think the election cycle this year is going to be very interesting. Actually, I think it will be more exciting than ever before! With the US military satisfied the Rossi technology works, purchasing thirteen systems, and helping with R and D, I think the politicians are bound to be told

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread peter . heckert
Bushnell had the vision to make Mars habitable. Ok, thats an utopy. But can make deserts green and siberia habitable. Its unclear what this does to global climate. It can solve the water problems in far east and israel and can prevent wars for oil. But this all must be seen with care. Each new

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: I understand and agree with all the reasons but the problem I see is accounting for the water. But how much water? I can't really tell what Lewan measured. It's pretty simple. Lewan measured about 11 liters going in to

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: An ultrasonic nebulizer is certainly possibly but it's a bit far fetched. A bit? How would the water from this reach the end of the hose without forming drops and becoming an

Re: [Vo]:Why not duplicate Rossi\'s setups and see how theyworkwithout LENR?

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote: Lewan's 2nd test in april adequately measured the output energy to establish O/I of over 3/1. Since steam quality and output measurements have been questioned and used as a basis to argue that the various Rossi tests

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Ransom Wuller
So some things are impossible? You should keep an open mind. It doesn't violate any principles of physics for a mist of micrometer droplets to travel through a hose, and it is far more plausible than radiationless nuclear reactions producing heat. Joshua: Considering this mist after

Re: [Vo]:Why not duplicate Rossi\'s setups and see howtheyworkwithout LENR?

2011-12-13 Thread Ransom Wuller
That calculation also requires an assumption that the steam that escapes at the end of the hose is dry. That is highly unlikely. If in fact, a fine mist or fog was entrained in that steam, to explain the disappearance of water, very little gain is established. Sure, but the output after

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Cude wrote: So some things are impossible? You should keep an open mind. It doesn't violate any principles of physics for a mist of micrometer droplets to travel through a hose, and it is far more plausible than radiationless nuclear reactions producing heat. What is possible and

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote: I am all for vertical agriculture, but I am totally opposed to a global basic income. I do not support socialism or communism. Socialism, communism and capitalism are all based on ordinary people trading labor for money. In a few decades human labor

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo wrote: So why not take some of the output heat, run it through a simple and reliable control system, and then return the heat to the input end? Then, Rossi could self sustain after a brief initial period of electrical heating, for as long as he liked. He did that! What are you

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: I could set up a test to do that this afternoon, since I have an ultrasonic humidifier. I would use a plastic bag to funnel the mist into a short garden hose, and put a bucket at the end of the hose to collect the water. Use a scale to weigh the bucket and the humidifier reservoir

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
I have one of those, 5L. At maximum power, it takes 33W and 15 hours to empty all the reservoir, but the fog is so dense that it falls within a meter but it is so opaque cannot see through it. Despite all this, putting my hand in front of exit of the fog, it takes a few seconds to make my hand

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
BTW, the vertical component of the exit tube of my humidifier is only 5cm long... 2011/12/13 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com I have one of those, 5L. At maximum power, it takes 33W and 15 hours to empty all the reservoir, but the fog is so dense that it falls within a meter but it is so

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha wrote: BTW, the vertical component of the exit tube of my humidifier is only 5cm long... Mine too. As I said, I think you could use a plastic bag to funnel the vapor into a hose. Put a plastic bag around the exit tube, and tape it. Cut off one corner of the bag leaving a

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Mary Yugo wrote: So why not take some of the output heat, run it through a simple and reliable control system, and then return the heat to the input end? Then, Rossi could self sustain after a brief initial period

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Cude wrote: So some things are impossible? You should keep an open mind. It doesn't violate any principles of physics for a mist of micrometer droplets to travel through a hose, and it is far more plausible than

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: I have one of those, 5L. At maximum power, it takes 33W and 15 hours to empty all the reservoir, but the fog is so dense that it falls within a meter but it is so opaque cannot see through it. Despite all this, putting

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel Rocha wrote: BTW, the vertical component of the exit tube of my humidifier is only 5cm long... Mine too. As I said, I think you could use a plastic bag to funnel the vapor into a hose. Be sure to mix it

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
Even if all is carried, the fog is extremely think and doesn't match the video. And even with a such thick fog, my hand, it takes seconds for my hand to feel the moisture. This leads me to think that it is impossible that more than 1/1 of liquid by liquid is present in that video. 2011/12/13

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
*liquid by volume 2011/12/13 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com Even if all is carried, the fog is extremely think and doesn't match the video. And even with a such thick fog, my hand, it takes seconds for my hand to feel the moisture. This leads me to think that it is impossible that more

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: He did that! What are you talking about?!? He has made the thing self-sustain from internally generated heat for 4 hours. It's not self-sustaining if you have to cycle the input power, and Rossi has admitted that the

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: Did you notice the difference between the ecat that could self-sustain, and the one that did not? About 70 kg more mass, and 8 kW less power. Hmmm. Coincidence? NO! Progress!

Re: Aw: [Vo]:God Revealed Tomorrow?

2011-12-13 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 10:57 PM 12/12/2011, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: So far I have read, they got strong evidence, but not this high evidence that is needed for such a fundamental discovery. They are not like Rossi. They will test it again and again and doubt and harden it by all possible methods, before they

[Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread pagnucco
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs and Cold Fusion are Different Concepts - Dec 13 2011 http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-and-cold-fusion-are-different-conceptsdec-13-2011

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
I don't know if anyone stopped to think that WL claims are much more spectacular than Rossi's. While Rossi's claims only refer to small black boxe(s), WL includes things that work with the ecat's super qualities plus that nearly all natural phenomena should include some LENR, almost like all

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Yamali Yamali
I'm sorry if this has been discussed before. What I find odd about Newan's documentation is that he notes the boiling point at 99.5 C. He then adds .5 C to that on page two when explaining the outlet under approximately 200 mm or so of water. So he gets 100 C overall and a measured T out of

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote: I don't know if anyone stopped to think that WL claims are much more spectacular than Rossi's. While Rossi's claims only refer to small black boxe(s), WL includes things that work with the ecat's super qualities plus

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo wrote: Rossi ran a nuclear reactor for four hours with a claimed six month capability and I am supposed to be ecstatic? Since it would have cooled down immediately in the absence of anomalous heat, 4 hours proves the point as well as 40 years would. There is nothing in any

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
The topic now is WL theory... Rossi's claims are just too shy in comparison. 2011/12/13 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote: I don't know if anyone stopped to think that WL claims are much more spectacular than Rossi's.

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Mary Yugo wrote: Rossi ran a nuclear reactor for four hours with a claimed six month capability and I am supposed to be ecstatic? Since it would have cooled down immediately in the absence of anomalous heat, 4

Fwd: [Vo]:Why not duplicate Rossi\'s setups and see howtheyworkwithout LENR?

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
This went to personal mail, so I'm forwarding to the list: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Ransom Wuller rwul...@peaknet.net wrote: Sure, but the output after traveling through meters of hose also had to then travel through water allowed to stand at room temperature. It's exactly what

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
The statement from Lattice Energy LLC strikes me as essentially saying: Accept no other theory than our own. IOW, product placement. If LE LLC eventually gets around to unveiling their own Dog Pony show, meaning the presentation of a product (or just a prototype), then by all means, let the

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Mary Yugo wrote: There is nothing in any Rossi device's design that routes heat BACK from output to input via a controller. This make no sense. The heat is there in the reactor. There is no need to conduct,

[Vo]:Higgs, Alpha, and Ebenezer

2011-12-13 Thread Jones Beene
On 12th Day before Christmas, the ATLAS money-pit collaboration found that a Higgs mass from 145 to 206 GeV has been excluded by their testing, and today the geniuses have ‘probably’ limited the particle to a range of 115–130 GeV. What a bunch of unmitigated pomposity. Give them a continuing 5

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Randy Wuller
Members of the Vortex: I joined last night to address an issue raised by Maryyugo. Being a lawyer I really have no special expertise in the sciences and thus have little to offer on technical issue. Thus, not wanting to burden all of you I will likely either stay a member and be quiet or exit

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs and Cold Fusion are Different Concepts - Dec 13 2011 As usual, he points out 1) the absurdity of breaching the Coulomb barrier in ordinary fusion, which would take something approaching 100 keV for

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: OK. Then why does it have to be reheated by a safety heater at regular intervals? I do not know, but there must be a reason. Nothing happen in nature without a cause. Perhaps they will find a way to make it run without this in the future. In any case,

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: In any case, it continues in self-sustaining mode far beyond the limits of chemistry, Not more than a few per cent on *this* side of the limits of chemistry. and the energy used to reheat it is far less than the

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote: Members of the Vortex: I joined last night to address an issue raised by Maryyugo. Being a lawyer I really have no special expertise in the sciences and thus have little to offer on technical issue. Thus, not wanting to

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Randy Wuller: ... ... I also don't care if the name given to the process is particularly accurate from a scientific standpoint, you guys can call it whatever you want once you figure it out. Many on this list have argued this very issue. So have I. Before I was asked to resign, while I

[Vo]:ENEA endorses the phenomenon

2011-12-13 Thread Moab Moab
my first post ... Mary Yugo wrote As Carl Sagan was fond of pointing out, the more extreme the claim, the better the evidence has to be. Anyone can claim anything and there are plenty of strange and not wonderful web sites that demonstrate the phenomenon. The interesting thing to me is

Re: [Vo]:Higgs, Alpha, and Ebenezer

2011-12-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Jones sez: ... What a bunch of unmitigated pomposity. Give them a continuing 5 billion per annum - and in few decades, wow - they could probably get it right. Isn’t it about time for a big dose of “Occupy CERN”. From: http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/

[VO]: ENEA endorses the phenomenon

2011-12-13 Thread Moab Moab
my first post ... Mary Yugo wrote As Carl Sagan was fond of pointing out, the more extreme the claim, the better the evidence has to be. Anyone can claim anything and there are plenty of strange and not wonderful web sites that demonstrate the phenomenon. The interesting thing to me is

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a message from Mats Lewan. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A couple of comments. - The report you should refer to is this: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166569.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+28+April+2011.pdf Mary referred correctly to this report, but someone referred also to

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jouni Valkonen
On 13 December 2011 23:25, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: The higher temperature might as well be due to a slightly increased pressure inside the Ecat resulting in a higher boiling point Abd ul-Rahman Lomax calculated this many months ago. If steam was saturated (what is almost

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: However, it is very sad, that Lewan forgot to do simple steam sparging test, what would have been given simple datapoint of the overall performance. I discussed this with him. I think the bucket was too far from the reactor to do this

[Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread ecat builder
Hi All, Just a brief update on the replication attempt by Chan. Chan is an anonymous poster who claims to have replicated the Rossi reaction using powders on two builder sites, ecatbuilder.com and buildecat.com. He uses an RFG connected to a induction coil to heat the contents of a copper

Re: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 13.12.2011 23:21, schrieb ecat builder: Hi All, Just a brief update on the replication attempt by Chan. Chan is an anonymous poster who claims to have replicated the Rossi reaction using powders on two builder sites, ecatbuilder.com and buildecat.com. He uses an RFG connected to a induction

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I calibrated the thermocouple in a pot of boiling water before the test and it was 99.6 deg C. That’s all you need to know. It’s in the report. The temperatures +/- a degree or two within boiling are not informative.

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread Nick Palmer
Chris Zell wrote: Once the emergence is established, there will be evidence of public grief by various enviromentalists and climate change activists. Only a few will observe what this teaches about their real motives were I'm not having a go at Chris directly here but he repeats a common

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion Economic Effects

2011-12-13 Thread Jouni Valkonen
Thanks Jed for explaining this automation argument in detail again. It is surprising how it seems impossible for humans to comprehend that argument, because this has been the reality for decades. And we have all the evidence if we just look around. However automation is not bad thing. We just

Re: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote: Am 13.12.2011 23:21, schrieb ecat builder: Hi All, Just a brief update on the replication attempt by Chan. Chan is an anonymous poster who claims to have replicated the Rossi reaction using powders on two builder

RE: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Robert Leguillon
I have to say, I think that Mats did a great job in these tests. An input flowmeter would've been nice, but I think that the biggest criticism that I have is that the input power was not continually monitored. The results cannot entirely be explained away by the vaporization question. For these

RE: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread Jones Beene
No, Chan's mix isn't really close to the paper cited. Did you cite the wrong paper? Chan uses nickel and copper - plus the MgH2 and iron Max Plank uses no nickel or copper -Original Message- From: Peter Heckert He uses an RFG connected to a induction coil to heat the contents of a

Re: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread Ahsoka Tano
Nickel was used. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: No, Chan's mix isn't really close to the paper cited. Did you cite the wrong paper? Chan uses nickel and copper - plus the MgH2 and iron Max Plank uses no nickel or copper ..

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread Roarty, Francis X
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 5:32 PM Peter Heckert said [snip] This is rather exactly what they use at Max Plank Institute for their high temperature heat storage system. http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/10/1/325/pdf [/snip] Peter, In the past I have mentioned the Lyne furnace and MAHG

Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011

2011-12-13 Thread Yamali Yamali
I don't see how boiling a pot of water and sticking a thermometer somewhere into the swirling flow can possibly be as accurate as calculating it. Depending on the heat source, the pot and the placement of the thermometer you should always find a range of temperatures at least one or two degrees

Re: [Vo]:New Posting from Lattice Energy - LENR compared to CF

2011-12-13 Thread pagnucco
Joshua, I believe, Zawodny does explain the creation of ULM neutrons through the plasmonic creation of heavy electrons. See (slide 16) of http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/2010-Zawodny-AviationUnleashed.pdf I am unsure as to whether Zawodny is correct, but page 9 of INTENSE FOCUSING OF

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Harry Veeder
Yes, thane's research was the inspiration for this experiment. Harry On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: Reminds me of Thane Heins' Regenerative Acceleration.

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Harry Veeder
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: The central issue is that Acceleration Under Load (AUL) is a misnomer. No. It describes exactly what is observed. The acceleration is occurring when coils are being shorted. Two issues arise: 1) The

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Harry Veeder
Please remember that the impluse required to produce a jump in angular velocity is not the same as the torque required to produce a steady angular acceleration. Harry On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon

Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Harry Veeder
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon 2) Shorting the coil does create a collapsing magnetic field. The time constant of the collapsing field is proportional to the resistance to electrical current. If the shorted coil collapses at just the right speed w.r.t. the disk rotation,

[Vo]:Xenon-hydrogen

2011-12-13 Thread Jones Beene
Occasionally the MAHG comes up in regard to Rossi... as much in the context of a 'missed opportunity' as anything else. The original device was constructed 8 or more years ago in Russia by Alexander Frolov. Having seen his name recently (in mention of Yan Kucherov), I googled to see if he is

Re: [Vo]:ENEA endorses the phenomenon

2011-12-13 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Moab Moab moab2...@googlemail.com wrote: my first post ... Mary Yugo wrote As Carl Sagan was fond of pointing out, the more extreme the claim, the better the evidence has to be. Anyone can claim anything and there are plenty of strange and not

Re: [Vo]:Higgs, Alpha, and Ebenezer

2011-12-13 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 13-12-2011 21:50, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: From: http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/ By fitting a theoretical model of the composition of the Universe to the combined set of cosmological observations, scientists have come up with the

[Vo]:Fwd: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture

2011-12-13 Thread fznidarsic
Subject: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture I see it but I still don't believe it. http://academicearth.org/lectures/batteries-emf-energy-conservation-kirchoffs-rules

Re: [Vo]:Xenon-hydrogen

2011-12-13 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:09:15 -0800: Hi, [snip] http://www.faraday.ru/ah.pdf This is not the first time xenon and hydrogen have been proposed to work together for gain. Indeed. Papp used a mixture of all the noble gasses, including Xe. (With the H coming from

Re: [Vo]:Higgs, Alpha, and Ebenezer

2011-12-13 Thread mixent
In reply to Man on Bridges's message of Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:26:08 +0100: Hi, [snip] Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter. - Albert Einstein I don't think it's

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture

2011-12-13 Thread mixent
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:30:30 -0500 (EST): Hi, [snip] Subject: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture I see it but I still don't believe it.

Re: [Vo]:Replication News from Chan

2011-12-13 Thread mixent
In reply to ecat builder's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:21:23 -0800: Hi, [snip] Quoting: Experiment with RFG to determine sweet spot for initial heating and then sweet spot for maintaining reaction, modulating pulse rate, frequency and power. Wave shape is important. Half wave sweet spots also

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture

2011-12-13 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: mix...@bigpond.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 14.12.2011 07:22 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:30:30 -0500 (EST):

Re: [VO]: ENEA endorses the phenomenon

2011-12-13 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Moab Moab moab2...@googlemail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 13.12.2011 21:51 Betreff: [VO]: ENEA endorses the phenomenon my first post ... Mary Yugo wrote As Carl Sagan was fond of pointing out, the more extreme the claim, the

RE: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load

2011-12-13 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
I think I've watched all of Thane's vids and from what I remember, there is a lower limit (RPM) where the acceleration will not happen, but if you start at, or above, that RPM, then shorting the coils causes very significant acceleration (IIRC, 100rpm/sec) from say 1700 RPM to over 3000. I