Please remember that the impluse required to produce a jump in angular velocity is not the same as the torque required to produce a steady angular acceleration.
Harry On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Robert Leguillon > <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> The central issue is that Acceleration Under Load (AUL) is a misnomer. > > No. It describes exactly what is observed. > >> The >> acceleration is occurring when coils are being shorted. Two issues arise: >> 1) The initial power/rpm ratio is set while these same "regenerative coils" >> are presenting opposition to movement. In most experiments, just moving the >> coils out of the way would result in more rpm/watt. > > If you remove the coils then you are missing the point of the experiment. > According according to Lenz law the coils should should slow the rotor > when the coils are shorted and remain shorted. > > >> 2) Shorting the coil does create a collapsing magnetic field. The time >> constant of the collapsing field is proportional to the resistance to >> electrical current. If the shorted coil collapses at just the right speed >> w.r.t. the disk rotation, it would cause a "push" in the direction of >> rotation. There could be a higher rpm of rotation at a lower torque value, >> and only within the narrow band of rotation frequency. > > Assuming this is possible, the effect you mention will only result in > momentary jerk in the direction of rotation. > However, what is observed is a steady acceleration in the direction of > rotation while the coils remain "shorted". > > Anyway Thane Heins youtube channel has better examples because you can > hear the acceleration. > > harry > >> >>> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:19:52 -0500 >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load >>> From: hveeder...@gmail.com >>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> >>> Hopefully it will become free energy device. >>> >>> Dozens of amateur researchers ( Steorn included ) have established >>> that it is possible to circumvent Lenz's law. The hope is this will >>> eventually lead to a free energy device. >>> >>> But even if you can't use a violation of lenz law to generate free >>> energy, this achievement alone deserves attention from mainstream >>> engineers and physicists, which it isn't getting. It is a strange >>> state of affairs. >>> Harry >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> > I am confused about the purpose of the experiment. Is this some kind of >>> > free >>> > energy device? If it really works, you should be able to drive the >>> > input >>> > with the output and have it to accelerate in speed or at least keep >>> > freely >>> > moving. If this can not be done, then most likely there is a difficulty >>> > in >>> > reading the true power output and input. >>> > >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >>> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> > Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm >>> > Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load >>> > >>> > acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66 >>> > >>> > http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0 >>> > >>> > <<The previous setup had physical limitations although it was >>> > excellent for demonstrating the AUL [acceleration under load] effect. >>> > This setup lends itself better to harnessing the effect for >>> > power-generation. >>> > >>> > I've done away with the Bedini drive circuitry and replaced it with a >>> > 12v/6w motor from an Audi message-pump system : >>> > >>> > >>> > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12v-DC-electric-motor-UK-SELLER-/110739940158?pt=UK... >>> > >>> > This gives me twice the RPM for a third of the input power, coupled >>> > with the fact that the rotor has 24 poles, arranged N/S i can now get >>> > higher frequencies. >>> > >>> > This is running at around six or seven hudred Hz. >>> > >>> > According to the meters more power is coming out than going in, but we >>> > all know how deceptive things can be and i can't do proper >>> > measurements until i get my hands on a scope, which i will get in the >>> > new year.>> >>> > >>>
