*I will go way out on the limb here, but I predict that the
Nobel-prize-winning laser physicist Steven Chu, who currently serves as
President Obama's energy secretary, will no longer seek to remain in the
job. Four years as head of the US Department of Energy cannot be easy and
Chu, 63, will no
Dear Friends,
Happy New Year of LENR certainties for you all!
Please read:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/01/informavores-sunday-no-488_01.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
If there were a movie portraying a world made continually overcast by the
environmental engineering of vampires so they could rule the world and keep
humans as livestock -- and the sun breaking through anyway to burn them all
alive as the climax, then we would be onto something. Short of that,
Inconclusive blather. See:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/12/31/2012-the-year-of-cold-fusion/
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Inconclusive blather.
The only thing you can do with inconclusive data -- like Rossi and
Defkalion's.
lol
Harry
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:51 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Not good Harry, change it somehow. Since Marry and I got engaged I am a
whole lot
happier. Not even Jones upsets me any more.
I predict I will spend another year alone.
Happy New Year y'all.
Harry
I agree, Jed.
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness and monitor
their
I tried to get a Version of 'Tex the World' that works with Firefox ver9 but
there is none.
From: Charles HOPE
Avital Oliver wrote a lightweight browser plug-in for Firefox which renders
LaTeX equations, called TEX http://thewe.net/tex/ THE WORLD. It has since
been ported
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him
to witness and monitor
their experiments.
If we learned nothing else from the experiences with Rossi, it should be
that witness and monitor isn't enough.
I predict that the world will formally acknowledge cold fusion aka LENR this
year. The evidence will finally be so overwhelming that the physics community
can no longer deny it. Of course they will claim that they knew it was
happening, but only in the form of LENR and not cold fusion which
MY, that was a general challenge. Not specific to Rossi or DGT.
2012/1/1 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him
to witness and monitor
their experiments.
If
It would be interesting if a form of X-Prize was set up to reward the group
that reaches an important LENR goal. The solving of the energy crisis is at
least as important as any of the other prizes awarded.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Mary Yugo will repent of her sins after a long pause and will become one
of the best proponents of cold fusion filling all of the forums with
glowing reports. Rossi will hire her as his spokeswoman since she can work
Don't go to fast. In 1995 I came back, from Power Gen 95, to my Utility
Employer and wrote and impact statement about Clean Energy Technologies device.
It was reported, We have liftoff. Motorola offered 60 million for the
technology. Miley independently tested it. By now all of the world
On 2012-01-01 19:03, David Roberson wrote:
The oil producers will make an all out attempt to stop the universal
usage of cold fusion devices by claims of danger and radiation.
I think it will more likely be the greens, climate activists,
anti-technology / anti-progress groups, and more in
A founder of the US Tokamak program proposed just that in 1995:
http://www.oocities.org/jim_bowery/BussardsLetter.html
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be interesting if a form of X-Prize was set up to reward the
group that reaches an
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
In 1995 I came back, from Power Gen 95, to my Utility Employer and wrote
and impact statement about Clean Energy Technologies device. It was
reported, We have liftoff. Motorola offered 60 million for the
technology. Miley independently tested it. By now all of
HI David,
Loved reading your predictions. Good, well-thought-out predictions tend to
make readers want to comment on them and add their own two cents... and
yours is no exception.
I predict that the world will formally acknowledge cold fusion aka
LENR this year. The evidence will
Electromagnetic Composites at the Compton Scale
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1110/1110.0034v1.pdf
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years there have been a number of experimental observations
that are dicult to explain within our nowstandard
models of atomic and nuclear physics and cosmology.
Yes, but watching paint dry is ultra-exciting if the payoff is trillion$.
Gibbs appears to be happy writing Forbes filler-pieces.
He should get more creative.
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes. It would be Win-Win-Win.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it not happened? Gibbs doesn't seem in any way
reluctant to write in detail about LENR
Courtesy of coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
Edmund Storms on The Nuclear Active Environment and Metals That Work
coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SorcxYf8VYg
He discusses Rossi, F-P, Piantelli, Ni-H, Pd-H
Title: WordPress.com
So why doesn't he throw down the gauntlet?
How hard is that??
Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly
be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it
I agree Gibbs is just writing filler pieces but the way he bends the facts
and creates straw men to aggravate LENR proponents into doing his homework
is infuriating, We never said it was fusion or that it was known physics
-both of which premises he assumes to support his skeptical platform while
After the talk they show the gas loaded Ni experiment in his lab. Worth
seeing.
- Jed
Download and install GreaseMonkey (you can search via FireFox addons)
or go here:
http://www.greasespot.net/
Once GreaseMonkey is installed and FireFox is restarted, click on the
userscript on this page: http://thewe.net/tex/
And the following should be real pretty.
[;e^{\pi i} + 1 = 0;]
-
Here is an article published in November:
Defkalion: 'We have Rossi’s formula'
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3353181.ece
I should have paid closer attention to this. In this article, Xanthoulis
says they got the formula from mass spec data taken by U. Padua. I think
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If there was subterfuge, it is no wonder Rossi is upset.
But Rossi is also guilty of subterfuge. He has copied the geometry of
Defkalion. Note that Defkalion stated they were surprised at what
they saw when the October
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Defkalion's kernel is rectangular, not cylindrical. They have found a
way to wafer the kernel in such a way that the reaction is spread over
a greater area.
Here's the thread on Defkalion's geometry. I suspect that
I remember reading some of this stuff.
Regarding the following statement from DGT:
...
We were surprised to see our old designs used in public
testing. We were confused why our old designs were implemented
wrongly, as well as witnessing insufficient use of instruments
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3eOWIvb6vMnoredirect=1
Hey Frank Z you get a nice mention.
He's off by a factor of ten on the amount of money that has been spent on
hot fusion research.
The assertion that the theory is now known is nonsense. It may be that
one of the many theories out there is correct, but that doesn't mean it is
known which of those theories it is.
On Sun, Jan 1,
Forbes is all about business and investing. I've been a subscriber 25
years. This is my take:
Gibbs is alerting readers that there is a probability that energy
stocks could quickly lose value due to a Cold Fusion device
impacting traditional energy demand. Some believe it is a zero percent
I like that he spoke in generalities- I completely agree with what he
outlined regarding the environment disassociating the molecules into atoms
but he probably would not commit to my posit based on Naudts, Moller and
Lyne that it is the change in Casimir force that performs the
disassociation.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:12 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
He's off by a factor of ten on the amount of money that has been spent on
hot fusion research.
The assertion that the theory is now known is nonsense. It may be that
one of the many theories out there is correct, but
Does anyone know where the following paper can be located?
A. Carnera, S. Focardi, A. Rossi, to be published on Arxiv
It is referenced in the following paper.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=53
I think it is a paper that Arxiv rejected.
I think the paper would be very interesting
So where is the data obtained from the mass spec data taken by U. Padua?
Is it in the paper, A. Carnera, S. Focardi, A. Rossi, to be published on Arxiv
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 7:04 PM
I support more or less your predictions.
many (not all) Green will try to oppose LENR because it is agains their
agenda. it is breaking their plot to make a better world by reducing
comfort, energy, consumption, sins, and corruption of the nature. it is
breaking their agenda to use climate fear
39 matches
Mail list logo
