On 2012-01-02 07:47, noone noone wrote:
Does anyone know where the following paper can be located?
Unfortunately, it isn't available anywhere.
Rossi explained several months ago that he changed his mind about
publicly publishing it because it would have revealed confidential
information:
Hi Horace,
I noticed that the sums of the released photons plus the terms in brackets
are close, but not really the same. Why?
What is the meaning of that sum? I cannot figure out, I'm sorry.
2011/12/17 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
Deflation fusion theory provides a potential
Alain Sepeda wrote:
many (not all) Green will try to oppose LENR because it is agains their
agenda. it is breaking their plot to make a better world by reducing comfort,
energy, consumption, sins, and corruption of the nature
You don't know what you are talking about. You are just parroting
You cannot imagine how green I am in fact(because of the 70s and 1974
energy saving campaign in Europe).
but these days things are getting crazy, and the green that you depict are
no more influent.
visible greens are no more like what you say. it has became an apocalyptic
sect, highly competent
I sent a reply to vortex-b
The sig should have read:
http://wattsupwiththat.com
For a Better World, With Fewer Mouths To Feed - They will be worth
more.
Yes I did, however, as Jones and many others will tell you that I am a crank.
Too bad we cant do a video conference. I what to see Horace. Horace, please
call me on Skype.
name Frank.Znidarsic, see the dot you need it.
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
On Jan 2, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Hi Horace,
I noticed that the sums of the released photons plus the terms in
brackets are close, but not really the same. Why?
What is the meaning of that sum? I cannot figure out, I'm sorry.
The sums in brackets are estimates of the
Alright, so the most probable reactions are those that minimize the energy
spent at any given time. That is, those that require the least binding
energy for the deflated proton. But, shouldn't that mean that Ni58 is the
one that gives more energy? After all the number in bracket is the smallest
On Jan 2, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Alright, so the most probable reactions are those that minimize the
energy spent at any given time. That is, those that require the
least binding energy for the deflated proton. But, shouldn't that
mean that Ni58 is the one that gives more
I have to take care of a rental in Anchorage that was just vacated.
Makes me a little nervous considering Gene Mallove's history with
that kind of thing.
I will not be able to follow things here for a while.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
How do you know how much go to photons and to neutrinos?
2012/1/2 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
On Jan 2, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Alright, so the most probable reactions are those that minimize the energy
spent at any given time. That is, those that require the least
I assume the principal author is Alberto Carnera of Padua U. See:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=8804559
Defkalion says they got an important clue from U. Padua mass spec results.
My guess is that these results are in this unpublished paper. Rossi was
probably right that it
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-01-02 07:47, noone noone wrote:
Does anyone know where the following paper can be located?
Unfortunately, it isn't available anywhere.
Rossi explained several months ago that he changed his mind about
So, he is the guy who is specialist in materials science, specially the
characterization of materials.
2012/1/2 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
I assume the principal author is Alberto Carnera of Padua U. See:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=8804559
Defkalion says
There's the alternative vixra.org. Takahashi posted many papers there:
http://vixra.org/author/Akito_Takahashi
2012/1/2 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-01-02 07:47, noone noone wrote:
Does anyone
I find that cited in some comment :
*
http://digital.ni.com/worldwide/bwcontent.nsf/websearch/2c6b449a3f0f8f3a862579480060a07f
*http://digital.ni.com/worldwide/bwcontent.nsf/websearch/2c6b449a3f0f8f3a862579480060a07f
National Instruments Empowers Big Physics Solutions*NEWS RELEASE – Nov. 14,
HI Horace,
I have to take care of a rental in Anchorage that was just vacated.
Makes me a little nervous considering Gene Mallove's history with
that kind of thing.
You probably don't have anything to worry about. NTL, it wouldn't hurt to
take along a strapping handyman along. IOW, don't
(answering a question on the wired link)
Obviously the reporter is trying to present the story balanced, even
though there are some mistakes in it, like ...The first will be
a one-megawatt device, the same scale as the one in Rossi's demonstration
in October
The 45kW multi-reactor Hyperion's
Or merely a photoshop error. The nine ft tall soldier:
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/12/9-foot-tall-supersoldier-mourns-kim-jong-il/250658/
T
It's SLENDERMAN!!! :D
2012/1/2 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Or merely a photoshop error. The nine ft tall soldier:
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/12/9-foot-tall-supersoldier-mourns-kim-jong-il/250658/
T
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
A word to the wise: do not announce that you will be away from home on the
Internet. Here in Atlanta, someone might break into your house.
We all live in goldfish bowl. See Jeremy Benthem's Panopticon Prison.
- Jed
On Jan 2, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
How do you know how much go to photons and to neutrinos?
Due to lack of time I'll cut and paste a lot of stuff from prior
posts. I do have to go. I hope it makes sense.
Very little goes to photons because the electron does not have time
It's OK to be Out for a while ... but NEXT time, could you leave
Vortex up and running? =8-)
There may be a small indication of progress at Forbes. The author, Gibbs,
called out one of my comments. I believe this is the first time a
positive remark called out (featured).
I think there are fewer rabid attacks in the comments, but it is hard to
judge with only ~20 comments.
Also, miracle
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
It's SLENDERMAN!!! :D
I was not familiar with the myth. Apparently, one movie has been made:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5apy27bksGo
and another is in post production:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1658837/
T
I see Vorl Bek is over on Vortex B talking to the Grok thing.
He/she wrote The 'green' people completely ignore our insanely large
population thus proving beyond doubt that he/she knows absolutely nothing and
just makes stuff up. Even more laughably, they also promote wattsupwiththat.com
-
Not only 1 movie, but several amateur made series. I think I keep track of
10 of them, ate least.
2012/1/2 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's SLENDERMAN!!! :D
I was not familiar with the myth. Apparently,
Enjoy your trip. Alaska must be quite an experience this time of year. I intend
to have pondered your papers when you have returned.
On Jan 2, 2012, at 11:37, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I have to take care of a rental in Anchorage that was just vacated. Makes me
a
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Not only 1 movie, but several amateur made series. I think I keep track of
10 of them, ate least.
So, do you think he is after Kim Jong Un (hopefully)?
T
Hopefully he will go after the american bases there too :)
2012/1/2 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not only 1 movie, but several amateur made series. I think I keep track
of
10 of them, ate least.
So, do you
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hopefully he will go after the american bases there too :)
America has bases in N Korea?
T
Why a curling stone curls remains controversial. Yes there are
computer models which generate similiar trajectories, but they rest on
assumptions of melt water, and other scientists who research ice
tribology find no evidence that ice melts at the associated
temperatures and pressures.
I believe
Some info on Prof. Carnera:
http://www.matis.imm.cnr.it/view.php?nome=Carnera
Of course America does not have bases there.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jan 2, 2012 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] N Korea's Secret Weapon
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
America has bases in N Korea?
All your base are belong to us.
- Jed
35 matches
Mail list logo
