On 01/09/2012 11:13 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Thanks Mauro,
Would you say that the number of protons and electrons being ejected from
the sun remains relatively equal?
I was just thinking about that. I think that the total number of
expelled protons must be greater
stupendous often posts in the Greek language. His latest post
regarding his visit to DGT:
Re: About that tour you were offering
stupendous
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:26 am
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:12 pm
Posts: 24
Well since I had visited DGT's offices in Glyfada, I presume I am
From Mauro:
I was just thinking about that. I think that the
total number of expelled protons must be greater
than the number of electrons, to effectively establish
an overall electric current with the surroundings,
which tries to compensate for the charge disbalance.
...
If something like
From Mauro:
I was just thinking about that. I think that the
total number of expelled protons must be greater
than the number of electrons, to effectively establish
an overall electric current with the surroundings,
which tries to compensate for the charge disbalance.
...
If something
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
No positron - no H+H fusion. It is almost that simple.
You appear to be neglecting H-H fusion by electron capture. This also
happens in
the Sun, but at a low rate.
Hi Robin,
If the EC reaction happens in the sun (at a low rate), given the
See:
http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=1685
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest you to upload it on LENR-CANR.org as a multi-part zip file to be
downloaded and extracted on users' hard drives for off-line reading . . .
It did not compress much with zip. It went from 96 MB to 89 MB.
The PDFConverter tools do a
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=1685
It's an hour of audio! Maybe someone who listened to it all can summarize
what Storms had to say specifically about Rossi. Will there be a transcript
at some point?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:52:17 -0800:
Hi Jones,
Actually I largely agree with your position. I too think that fusion reactions
are unlikely in this case (though not impossible). I'm trying to keep an open
mind here. Note also that I think the H+H-D reaction is
See:
http://www.thespaceshow.com/detail.asp?q=1685
Thank Jed,
Just finished listening to The Space Show an interview with Dr. Storms.
The segment with skeptic Charles Pooley was perhaps the most
entertaining part of the show for me. The ensuing interaction between
the host (Dr. David
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:18 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect there will be nothing... nada...
zilch... that could possible result in even the slightest dent in this
skeptic's heavily fortified belief structure.
Nothing except an iron-clad,
From Mauro,
...
I think the problem is with the electrostatic idea...
if there are electric currents, then there isn't an
electrostatic situation. There's nothing static in a
system like the Sun and the Solar System.
Ah! THAT's what I missed in my prior speculation. Thanks for bringing
it
I would concur with Steven on the show, especially his description of the
segment with Pooley as the most 'entertaining'... I would call it comical.
Pooley kept on saying, If you can't explain it, it isn't fusion. Meaning, if
you can't explain it according to known theory, then it doesn't
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
It is Dr. Storms' assessment that energy costs, at
least for the common man, might actually go up, temporarily, as we
make what might be a costly transition from traditional energy sources
over to CF. According to Storms, he
Using LZMA algorithm it goes down to 74MB, still too much, but saves 22MB.
I used specifically xz (http://tukaani.org/xz/).
mic
2012/1/10 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest you to upload it on LENR-CANR.org as a multi-part zip
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
. . .I gather Jed remains highly
skeptical that most traditional energy providers would be capable of
making the transition.
Yup. See the books and articles by Prof. Clayton Christensen for the
reasons why. See especially The
Jed:
You might want to let Ed know that he could have easily slam-dunked Pooley by
simply bringing up the case of superconductors where the experimental side
pre-dated the theoretical. It took decades and a lot of funding after the
effect was shown to be repeatable, to develop a number of
I know this has been discussed in the past years, but I'd like to put this
thought out there for the Vorts who joined in the last 12 months...
What is electric 'charge'?
Yes, yes, I know what it is according to fizzix books, but the Vort
Collective tries to probe down past the 'practical'
First, a few excerpts from the article found here:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-quick-cooking-nanomaterials-microwave-to
morrow-air.html
It's really amazing as to how nanostructures seasoned with just a few atoms
of sulfur can lead to such superior thermoelectric properties of the bulk
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
And the following point…
Those who argue that Rossi’s inability to produce/replicate his 30%
efficient thermoelectric technology was proof of a scam, have no clue what
they are talking about.
If Rossi
I sometime speculate that the electron and the proton are drops of a
mix of two electric fluids, which on balance have a corresponding net
negative or a net positive charge.
Another idea is that there is universal ambient electric fuild, and
the difference between the proton and the electron
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I know this has been discussed in the past years, but I'd like to put this
thought out there for the Vorts who joined in the last 12 months...
What is electric 'charge'?
Yes, yes, I know what it is according
New possibilities for developing minimal mass, extremely sensitive,
collective many-body, quantum mechanical neutrino 'antennas'
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-collective-manybody-qm-neutrino-antennasjan-10-2012
A pretty venturesome proposal. It seems testable.
The
Harry wrote:
On the contrary, don't you think it is indicative that positive and
negative charge are more than simply opposites of each other? The difference
between the charges is related to mass and size/shape.
Your suggestion that it could be simply a difference in the amount of each
type of a
24 matches
Mail list logo
