It appears to me that they have most of the possible current levels covered.
Why list ranges that include each other?
Magnetic fields that are changing in magnitude or direction generate electric
fields that can impart energy upon charged particles. A steady magnetic field
is not able to
In earlier BLP filings - on what constitutes a hydrino catalyst, it turned out
to be possible to fit two thirds of the periodic table into their expansive
definition. Talk about “over-reaching” …
USPTO examiners detest these painfully long and over-reaching applications.
Many observers have
BLP being real or not, here is something that I find intriguing,
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193
QUOTE
The Klein-Gordon equation of the hydrogen atom has a low-lying eigenstate,
called hydrino state, with square integrable wavefunction. The
corresponding spinor solution of Dirac's equation
A number of observers have observed this deep Dirac (DDL) layer to be the
real source of Mills' hydrino since it is similar in ways - but not the
same - and its presence leads to a nuclear reaction. (which is a drastic
departure from Mills).
See Meulenberg,
The interesting for me to note is that the non square integrable feature of
the Dirac
solution is perhaps a key feature, It can (I'm not an expert) mean that you
generally do not see single live hydrinos but clusters of hydrogen that
take advantage of x number of hydrino states to keep the cluster
Axil wrote:
On bottom of page 165 and the top page 166, is that a description of a
Papp
engine that I see? I thought that the Papp engine was open source.
I don't think so. No mention of noble gases.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:59 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
The BLP website is
David Roberson wrote:
It appears to me that they have most of the possible current levels
covered. Why list ranges that include each other?
Agreed. Highly redundant.
Magnetic fields that are changing in magnitude or direction generate
electric fields that can impart energy upon charged
Does the relative mass of a hydrino increase with each reduced orbital
radius due to the increase angular momentum of the orbiting electron?
the first Papp patent(1970s) was based on water vapor, it was the second
patent (1980s) that was based on noble gases.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Axil wrote:
On bottom of page 165 and the top page 166, is that a description of a
Papp
engine that I
Stefan,
I have been citing that paper in blogs since 2009.. and
intriguing is an understatement.. the idea that the hydrogen loaded into a
lattice of bulk powder can be relativistic while sitting still on a lab bench
surly must be unphysical?? There is no gravity well or
Actually, the mass of the hydrino should be reduced since it has less energy
than zero level hydrogen. That energy and hence mass has been lost to the
catalyst.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 16,
I spent a bit of time adjusting some of the parameters of my thermal control
ECAT model and have a few observations.
I suppose that it seems obvious that the greater the non linearity of the
function binding core power generation to core temperature, the more critical
will be the required
Short answer. No one other than Mills can see them :-) and he's not letting
anyone borrow his hydrinoscope.
Anyway, from the perspective of common sense, why would Mills not claim that
(since energy has been given up with reduced orbitals), there would be a
slight mass decrease in what can
What McKubre neglected to mention but has been disclosed by Brillouin is
the design of their gas-phase system. They're working on a fluidized-bed
reactor with Nickel nano particles on ceramic beads, suspended in
flowing hydrogen. It's unclear how they apply the Q-pulse to such a
non-conductive
Terry Blanton wrote:
Does the relative mass of a hydrino increase with each reduced orbital
radius due to the increase angular momentum of the orbiting electron?
That seems to be the only conclusion possible.
However, I do not know whether BLP's theory is correct or not, but
I do not care. I
David Roberson wrote:
Actually, the mass of the hydrino should be reduced since it has less
energy than zero level hydrogen. That energy and hence mass has been lost
to the catalyst.
Dave
Well, yes - that should happen, if Mills' theory is correct.
I guess I should retract a previous
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
BTW, an interesting paper illustrating how powerful these fields can get
in nanocircuits is -
Optical generation of intense ultrashort magnetic pulses at the nanoscale
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6072
The underlying suggestion, which we
Jones,
This sounds quite plausible. Experiments will decide.
-- LP
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
BTW, an interesting paper illustrating how powerful these fields can get
in nanocircuits is -
Optical generation of intense ultrashort magnetic
Comments to the article.
Of cause, the singlarity is in origo (facepalms).
The dirac spinors will be some kind of delta measures with structure so
that the delta
measures cancels for the hydrino solution.
Don't know how stable and achiavable this is, probably someone with deeper
knowledge
need
Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out
of BLP and McKubre.
Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next indie
report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out
of BLP and McKubre.
Yesterday you were complaining about how stupid BLP and McKubre/Brillouin
are and how annoying they were behaving. Now you see value in these
reports, why? And you associate them with Rossi, why?
Blaze, you sound like a bookie. Are you the one calling the shots in that
game? Is anyone actually making bets according to your inputs?
How liquid are the bets and can someone get into a position and then out again
without delay? How is the money handled?
If someone had bought a position
John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully he can
help me understand it better. Does anyone actually risk capital on this issue?
I have seen plenty of proof that Rossi has the real deal and I can not imagine
how additional proof will make a difference to many others.
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:39:32 +:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Hydrinos have never been observed directly and only occur inside the metal
lattice where geometry dictates.
This is just wrong. The most common signature of Hydrino reactions is usually
detected in
In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:36:12 -0500 (EST):
Hi,
[snip]
My model can use any function that I choose for this purpose with the
exception of delay mechanisms. I suppose that they could also be incorporated
if there is a good reason to believe that they are
I guess I should have mentioned that I do include thermal storage within the
materials. This behaves much like a capacitor and charge. That is what
determines the time domain characteristics of my model.
I was referring to a different type of delay, such as one that might show up if
the
So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully he
can help me understand it better. Does anyone actually risk capital on
this issue?
I have
How does Mills theory distinguish been orbitals in a atom verses orbitals
in small atomic Rydberg cluster of 10 atoms or less. I say the Mills
experiments can't.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:56 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:39:32
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
The next indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection
report.
Okay, indie means independent. As in an indie movie festival.
That took me a while to translate from rad-speak to stan-Eng.
- Jed
At what exactly? State the conditionals in 10 pages or less.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
John, it does seem rather
That last years independent (thx jed!) report was accurate and it's caused
by nuclear rather than some sort of chemical reaction or hidden wires.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
At what exactly? State the conditionals in 10 pages or less.
On Thu, Jan 16,
At this point I would have to be shown iron clad evidence that the ECAT does
not generate additional heat beyond what is used for drive. That would have to
fall into the upper 90's.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for saying
35%.
But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a total
crank for putting that much faith into Rossi.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:31 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
At this point I
You are lucky in that case. The odds are in your favor and you should be able
to obtain a position for next to nothing. Scalp em.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 4:33 pm
Subject:
*What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for saying
35%. *
*But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a total
crank for putting that much faith into Rossi.*
I'm more interested to know how you arrived at that number. By factoring in
totally
but you seem to want to make a centerpiece of your arbitrary assessment
and no one can figure out why
Not at all. I have a history of successfully making such 'arbitrary'
assessments based on speculation / gossip / rumours / second hand
information .. generally by measuring the credibility of
*Which leads me to my next question.. What would your estimate be?
Probably more interesting than mine.*
Mine's not any more interesting, or any more legitimate. You're the pro,
not me. But neither is subject to the scientific method, so I don't think
either can be ranked in any meaningful way.
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a history of successfully making such 'arbitrary' assessments based
on speculation / gossip / rumours / second hand information .. generally by
measuring the credibility of the individuals that I gather such information
from.
That
I think the more people actively engaged in this pursuit probably shows
that there might be something that there that they are collectively
chasing. Each of them isn't very credible, but the whole science is
discredited so it's not too surprising that its taking rogue actors to make
progress.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:26:06 -0500:
Hi,
How does Mills theory distinguish been orbitals in a atom verses orbitals
in small atomic Rydberg cluster of 10 atoms or less. I say the Mills
experiments can't.
[snip]
Rydberg atoms don't have multiple energy levels and
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:31:31 +:
Hi,
[snip]
2. Solutions to Klein Gordon equations is most probably a combination of
spinor states for which the thick tails cancels. This may mean that you can
have a hydrino state, but it's basically impossible to
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:06:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Does the relative mass of a hydrino increase with each reduced orbital
radius due to the increase angular momentum of the orbiting electron?
According to Mills, the angular momentum and mass of the electron
In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:38:01 -0500 (EST):
Hi,
[snip]
Actually, the mass of the hydrino should be reduced since it has less energy
than zero level hydrogen. That energy and hence mass has been lost to the
catalyst.
Not all the energy is lost to the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:45:35 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Short answer. No one other than Mills can see them :-) and he's not letting
anyone borrow his hydrinoscope.
Actually there have been several (quasi) independent replications.
Anyway, from the perspective of
Don't you mean to say that Rydberg clusters don't have multiple energy
levels and characteristic transition energies, which are seen in Hydrino
experiments?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:26:06 -0500:
Hi,
Fractional spin and charge is a result of delocalization of the electron in
strongly correlated systems.
The spin and charge seem to wander away from the electron in condensed
matter systems.
This fractional spin and charge delocalization causes problems in chemistry
associated with the
I mentioned the energy lost to the catalyst when I actually meant to include
all of the various sinks. The main point I was intending to make is that
energy and thus the mass associated with that energy exits the hydrino. I have
one idea as to how that loss of mass may be distributed among
If the spin and charge leave the elctron, what happens to the orbit and
energy of the electron.
Remember that he quantum properties of the electron can be
separated(delocalized) into separate quasiparticles: spin, charge, and
orbit. Does that complicate understanding experimental findings that
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:55 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Yes. Once established the large current densities generate huge magnetic
fields circulating the current flow, or equivalently a magnetic vector
potential field pointing in current flow direction. If the current
suddenly stops,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a total
crank for putting that much faith into Rossi.
If not that, they would surely think you're a crank for being on this list.
Personally, I
Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:55 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Yes. Once established the large current densities generate huge magnetic
fields circulating the current flow, or equivalently a magnetic vector
potential field pointing in current flow direction. If the
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:02 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Hairy metal laser show produces bright X-Rays
-- Setting metallic wires on fire creates a bright X-Ray glow
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/11/hairy-metal-laser-show-produces-bright-x-rays/
Thank you, Lou, for the
He discounts the idea that the experiments mentioned in the article could
be translated into fusion research, since there are likely to be some
problems getting hydrogen or deuterium to grow in thin, long hairs,
Why do you think that Rossi put hairs on his micro-particles...it was to
get the
53 matches
Mail list logo
