Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

The whole discussion after the TRAIL is useless. Accusations between vorts, discussions trying to determine how Rossi is a fraud or not - all of counter productive. Rossi has a small window to show that he has something. His ethics need no analysis. Rossi as a person is of little interest if the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: > You would have to show intent and various legal proof that I do not >> understand. >> > ​***If you don't understand it then you're just as bad as these people you > rail against for not reading the Penon report. > I don't claim to understand the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: > The Penon report?!? >> > ​***ALL of it. The Penon report, the supposed heat exchanger, all of it. > If the Penon report is as fraudulent as you make it out to be, then > Rossi would be up on charges for that. > Nope. The legal system does not

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

I think the key is to just find nuclear products when you throw hydrogen and nickel together. There is no chemical reaction that is supposed to lead to nuclear products. 3 years ago, MFMP found gamma rays and then just blithely started chasing ghosts. On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ​ > > The Penon report?!? > ​***ALL of it. The Penon report, the supposed heat exchanger, all of it. If the Penon report is as fraudulent as you make it out to be, then Rossi would be up on charges for that. All

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: > As soon as they verify a LENR experiment that many who have the means can > do in our garages, the cat is out of the bag. > That may never happen. It may be that cold fusion is inherently difficult, like making a fuel cell or performing an

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: It is proof that he isn't a fraud. > The Penon report?!? Either you haven't read it or your interpretation of it is the extreme opposite or what Murray, Smith and I think of it. I have never seen such blatant, in-your-face fraud. If this report does

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

It is proof that he isn't a fraud. All the evidence is there, tagged and bagged, ready to go for the police to file charges. All it takes is for someone to drop a dime on Rossi. Maybe you'll get some kind of reward for it. On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Jed Rothwell

Re: [Vo]:LENR Insights from Proton 21

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > http://rexresearch.com/stuff/stuff7/adamenko.pdf > There is another assumption connected with these sections and it refers to > cosmology. It is known that there is a great quantity of "dark" matter in > the universe, and

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > Rossi is the latest LENR guy who has $signs in his eyes. Patterson was a solid example of that. I like the hope that MFMP offers to circumvent that problem. As soon as they verify a LENR experiment that many who

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Kevin O'Malley wrote: If Rossi's report proves he is a thief then he would be up on charges. Only if it were a serious crime. Most crimes are not even investigated, for lack of police personnel. Also, the police would have to understand the report. I doubt many of them do.

[Vo]:LENR Insights from Proton 21

http://rexresearch.com/stuff/stuff7/adamenko.pdf The Proton 21 experiment informs us about the true nature of LENR. That nature is not simply based on the detection of excess heat, but on the way that LENR processes energy. Quote from the reference The Black Hole as an Experimental Artifact

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Woodford Investments probably does not want Industrial Heat pursuing the matter. Harry On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > If Rossi's report proves he is a thief then he would be up on charges. > > On Friday, July 7, 2017, Jed Rothwell

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Che wrote: > > >> Clueless, DEAD wrong, AND delusional. All in one email post! >> > > That is not what I would call a cogent response, but I appreciate the > brevity of it. You needn't say

RE: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

What went through my mind was that Axil seemed a bit like a latter-day Jules Verne. Jules predicted nuclear subs that went to sea 82 years later. On the other hand, maybe Axil needs a little more Li in his reactor.  Bob Cook Bob Cook Sent from

Re: Fw: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > The classic case is the Aztecs. They were taken out over a few short months in a military engagement from a vastly outnumbered force, not by disease. There are a lot of factors involved in any historical

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

This note from Axil reminds me of my friends postings when he was in the manic phase when all things seem possible and easy to obtain. From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2017 4:40 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold

Re: Fw: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

The classic case is the Aztecs. They were taken out over a few short months in a military engagement from a vastly outnumbered force, not by disease. On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Brian Ahern wrote: > The Spanish had cholera. It was 100 times as effective as gunpowder.