This is another link describing the muon uranium reaction.
https://escholarship.org/content/qt9dt6d810/qt9dt6d810.pdf
FISSION YIELDS AND LIFETIMES FOR *MUON INDUCED FISSION* IN 235U AND 238U.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> One the other hand, in experiments with
One the other hand, in experiments with uranium, Leonid Urutskoev has
shown that in may be possible for the LENR reaction to produce a fission
explosion in fissile material. This line of experiments he undertook were
designed to show that the Chernobyl reactor explosion was produced by a
large
There have been at least two deaths which could be attributed to CF
experiments, one at SRI in 1992 and one in Japan.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:01 AM Axil Axil wrote:
> If an explosion in a LENR system were possible, it would have happen in
> the 30 some years that LENR experiments have been
If an explosion in a LENR system were possible, it would have happen in the
30 some years that LENR experiments have been going on all over the world.
No explosions of note have occurred in all that time and in all those
places.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion
We need to analyze the LENR
Axil Axil wrote:
LENR will not produce an explosive weapon . . .
>
Are you sure about that? You must think you understand the physics of cold
fusion better than Martin Fleischmann and Edward Teller did.
That comes across as rather arrogant. Since I just told you Fleischmann and
Teller thought
Oops a bit dyslexic – the 2:1 ratio is between deuterium and titanium – TiD2
and not the other way around... every atom of titanium binds two deuterons…
---
Another interesting detail is the ratio of titanium to deuterium. This is the
so-called loading ratio. In cold fusion, the
LENR will not produce an explosive weapon, but it is well suited for beam
type weapons, such as a disintegrator beam or a muon beam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCzqm8GzSb0
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very interesting.
>
> People have got it
Very interesting.
People have got it the wrong way around though. Its not because the
positive pressure has gone up. It is because the negative pressure has gone
up, the pF has gone up.
This relates to the first paper I published on the strength of clay-cements
and how it is affected by the
Another interesting detail is the ratio of titanium to deuterium. This is the
so-called loading ratio. In cold fusion, the goal is to reach 1:1 ratio of
palladium to deuterium and this ratio is difficult to achieve and a main reason
for failed results.
In contrast all titanium hydride will
Terry,
It looks like the uncompressed hydride TiD2 has a density of 3.9 g/cm3
The pure Ti metal has a density of 4.5 g/cm3
The normal hydride which has not been compressed contains 4% hydrogen but as a
result is reduced in density by 13%
Adding hydrogen as a hydride would normally be
The question is not if it will allow deadly weapons. It will, sure drones,
autonomous vehicles of many kinds, vessels, trucks, and less probably high
power bombs, but why not.
the question is if it will gives a stable advantage to some actors, like a
super poser, or to the weak power or citizen
Not so much as a weapon itself, but enabling weapons like robots and drones to
operate for long periods without strings attached.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: Vortex
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2018 2:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The potential weaponization of LENR
Martin
Martin Fleischmann worried about the possibility the cold fusion might be
used for a weapon. He discussed that in his letters with Miles. The
discussion is spread out over many letters. See p. 11, p. 430, and look for
"D.U.":
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanlettersfroa.pdf
Martin told me
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:39 AM, JonesBeene wrote:
Let’s hope this rambling is nothing more than SciFi fantasy or a far-out
plot for the next Bond thriller.
>
>
>
Z zerottc bcc can knb k BBMml .
Xgvyb
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® 6.
Original message From: JonesBeene Date:
8/16/18 12:39 AM (GMT-05:00) To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:The
potential weaponization of LENR
Periodically, new public information comes along
To a mathmatician/physicist it is monotonic because they will force us
to acknowledge the mismatch (albeit small) in masses/springs etc
together with the effect of friction.
The engineers will see it as constant velocity.
On 12/08/2018 20:01, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
The C-O-M motion is
16 matches
Mail list logo
