Funny you should mention GE. When I heard that Passerini had said the customer is "a well-known large industrial group" I immediately thought of GE, (who wouldn't), although I suppose it could be any one of a few other big name players.Anyway, I sent an enquiry to three of GE's senior press people
that I
had. Behold! Someone else has discovered this strange magnetic anomaly!
Yet Greg can't believe it either.
Craig Haynie
competence and is not a
trait in con artists. It's one of the more credible parts of his
personality.
Craig
I think it's a small RC jet at a distance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvqhLawLXNE
Craig
On 11/12/2012 02:52 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Don't say Bugs:
http://kdvr.com/2012/11/08/mile-high-city-mystery-ufo-sightings-in-sky-over-denver/
They need a high speed camera to find out what this is.
. It's powered by internal combustion.
What else could it be?
Craig
On 11/14/2012 09:01 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be
observed by slowing film -- both by original claimant and by the news
agency camera that validated his claim
-curiosity-discovery-mystery.html
Craig
is for discussion of Bitcoin related
activity. You were probably banned for not staying on topic.
Craig
Mills:
We will announce some substantial developments at some point.
Craig
Original Message
Subject:Re: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] End of Year
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:07:46 -0500
From: Randell Mills rmi...@blacklightpower.com
Reply
You can follow this latest replication live here:
http://data.hugnetlab.com/
Click on 'View' for Celani Cell #2 and you can follow the live graph.
If you have Google+, you can join a live hangout with them and talk to
them in real time. The hangout is 'MFMP'.
Craig
The have 48 watts of input power now and are getting out 52 - 54 watts
on their conservative estimate. Their optimistic estimate shows them at
around 67 - 70 watts out.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 04:45 PM, Craig wrote:
You can follow this latest replication live here:
http://data.hugnetlab.com
shape, and
with each wave lasting about an hour. I also see that the wave appears
to be tapering with the lows becoming higher and the heights become
lower. There also seems to be a correlation with T_Ambient, but why?
Very strange.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 09:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, Dec
The breathing correlates with T_Mica very well. Isn't this the
temperature of the wire? If so, then it's actually power that is
oscillating. I was thinking it might be something in the room environment.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 09:49 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2012-12-13 03:29, Craig wrote
They shut the power off from around 4:30 am EST until around 5:45am EST.
Does anyone know why?
Craig
can't pull up that exact graph, but the fluctuations are similar in
the lower P_Xs Low parameter.
Craig
On 12/13/2012 10:02 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I went to HUGentView and pulled up a graph with these parameters:
From: 12/12/2012 09:06:31 to 12/13/2012 09:06:31 Type: history
(yesterday
It may also be that if Celani has found a method which is 100%
reproducible, then it is because his method creates a more stable
reaction. Otherwise it probably wouldn't be 100% reproducible if it was
as erratic as other experiments.
Craig
On 12/13/2012 10:14 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2012
shown to be correct?
Craig
had changed then again, the shadow would have
moved.
Craig
I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
live run, the temperature appears to be about 5 C above that.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Correction! I didn't realize that they had upped the power to 54 watts.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:14 PM, Craig wrote:
I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
live run, the temperature appears
challenge you to spot it.
*
Did anyone ever find it?
Is it something as simple as labelling the Power (Red) variable as (bar)
for pressure, instead of (W) for watts?
Craig
think that's relevant for this issue. The temperature of the
inside of the glass appears to be the same in both the calibration runs
and this current test, for the same power level applied. This implies
that the extra temperature on the outside of the glass is some sort of
artefact.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 05:17 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5
degrees larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in
the progress blog comments.
Jeff
Where do you see T_Mica for the calibration runs?
Craig
that the temperature of the core is significantly
hotter also be an indication that they are actually seeing excess heat?
(isn't that T Mica) This makes T Glass In look suspicious, rather than
the T Glass Out measurement.
Craig
On 12/16/2012 09:58 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
They sure look correlated to me.
- Jed
The original poster at MFM clarified this when he said that the
amplitude of T_GlassOut had changed. It wasn't the cycle that was no
longer correlated, but rather the amplitude was much different.
Craig
, but not worldwide. There is too much money in
oil. If cold fusion becomes wildly successful, then this will solve your
problem, but it won't then be a political solution; it will be a market
solution. You won't even be able to point to government subsidies as the
reason for success.
Craig
Isn't it a calculated location? Isn't it the radius from the center of
the black hole at which a theoretical object at a great distance would
reach the speed of light when falling into the black hole from its gravity?
Craig
On 12/26/2012 04:57 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I read all the relevant
On 12/26/2012 10:56 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 05:56 PM 12/26/2012, Craig wrote:
Isn't it a calculated location? Isn't it the radius from the center
of the black hole at which a theoretical object at a great distance
would reach the speed of light when falling into the black hole from
' and something that is 'nothing'. Which characteristics
would be different? There can't be a difference when there are no
identifiable characteristics.
Craig
On 01/01/2013 01:38 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
As to the issue of unverfiiable source. You need to define what you
mean by unverifiable. How does one go about verifying a history book
like the Bible?
You can't... and that's the point.
Craig
with it. I can write a
book about life on Pluto, and you won't be able to prove it wrong.
Craig
?
Craig
On 01/01/2013 02:58 PM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Aha, but there is this concept of Preponderance of Evidence. While
this is a legal concept, we can nevertheless apply its principles in
our discussion.
Basically, what Preponderance of Evidence says is that if one side can
present a preponderance
.
Craig
? How was
it eaten? Which person are you referring to?
Craig
On 01/12/2013 11:09 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Things were going well. Amazon was selling my books. I was talking
on the radio. Some other were helping to get rid of nasty typos I
was promoting cold fusion and saying nice
back in the 2020s.
Craig
more. The moral solution is free of violence and the threat of
violence that governments impose when trying to change the structure of
society for some external reason. Such a change may be necessary, but
only if the Earth were definitely being threatened.
Craig
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw
Craig
On 01/31/2013 03:50 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:54, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think any
intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these people almost
and the size of town fires. Thankfully no one is
suggesting that we should get rid of the fire fighters so that we can
reduce the town fires.
Craig
Do you have a link to it?
Craig
On 02/03/2013 01:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Swedish TV program on cold fusion and the Ecat with english subtitles.
I think this first aired in the fall of 2012. Translation by Hampus Ericsson.
Essen and Kullander appear and say they are still convinced
increases -- to SOME degree?
Since there is no logical way that temperature changes could drive solar
activity, then solar activity is driving the temperature to some degree.
That's the only thing that makes sense. CO2 may be affecting it
somewhat, but it's not the only thing.
Craig
PS: I put
, in that during the summer, the CO2 levels fall, so
this would be the opposite to what I had assumed, which was the during
the summer the CO2 levels rose. Good point.
Craig, I appreciate your wanting to find alternative explanations to
global warming that isn't man made. All polluters wish they didn't
input should mean less average
global temperature rise from sun cycles.. What does effect the solar
input is seasonal. The Earth-Sun orbit is elliptical so at certain
times of the year we are closer to the sun than the other half. So
yes Craig, I will agree that on the solar input side
Please stop hijacking this discussion.
Thanks,
Craig
On 02/06/2013 09:27 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
Blah, blah, blah..living from paycheck to paycheck.
The discussion begins and ends there, simply by defining what the
phrase means. With greater advances in automation soon, that phrase
own copy of the data here:
http://climexp.knmi.nl/selectfield_obs.cgi?someone@somewhere
And to Chris Zell,
Your post on the economics of global warming is relevant. Your message
came in when several other messages came in, which were just making jokes.
Craig
On 02/06/2013 04:20 PM, Craig wrote:
On 02/06/2013 04:08 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It is a myth that temperatures have not increased in 16 years. The
people making this claim started with the highest outlier point 16
years ago. See:
I don't agree with that, but you can see it here:
http
On 02/07/2013 02:19 AM, Chuck Sites wrote:
Hi Craig, and fellow vortexians,
I'm looking at your graph on temperature anomalies and every data
point is above 0. Shouldn't some of you anomalies be negative. You
have 16 years of positive anomalies but not a single negative. I
think
%29
Craig
want to take money from those who do not believe in your plan,
nor agree with it? Do you want to take money from taxpayers?
That's always the rub with government-fostered experiments.
Craig
from me. It is
quite discouraging, and is depressing society.
The solution is to stop taking money from people against their will,
using threats of violence. The idea that we can improve society if only
we can threaten enough people, and take enough money from them, is
preposterous.
Craig
On 03/25/2013 08:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
Here's the Google translation:
BOLOGNA. Completed the day before the test VALIDATION
and the Hot Cat by
On 04/24/2013 07:26 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
We just shouldn't grant machines the decision about who lives or dies
Noel Sharkey, Chairman of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control.
I, for one, welcome our new robot masters...
. It then becomes easy to throw back an
answer before I've ascertained the validity of the answer. This aspect
of Rossi reminds me a lot -- of me. It takes a bit of effort to be precise.
Craig
for an inability to remember detail. So the weakness
in memory is offset by an increase in the ability to find solutions and
reconstruct that which I've forgotten.
Craig
On 05/23/2013 09:04 AM, Craig wrote:
On 05/22/2013 11:01 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It is strange how a detailed-oriented engineer sometimes
Frank, is there an electronic version of your book? I clicked on your
link below thinking that I could buy a version for my Kindle, but it
only seems to be in paper.
Craig
On 05/29/2013 08:45 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Energy-Cold-Fusion-Antigravity-Znidarsic/dp
I'm sure you've seen this one, as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQLCZOG202k
On 06/03/2013 09:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See a flash mob performance celebrating the reopening of the Rijksmuseum:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=a6W2ZMpsxhg
This kind of thing is
http://rt.com/news/fukushima-manager-yoshida-dies-cancer-829/
Craig
Excellent news! Rossi's technology is spreading on his terms, with his
contracts, apparently without a US or European patent.
Craig
On 07/09/2013 01:31 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
July 8th, 2013 at 10:25 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=810cpage=2#comment-734612
Can you provide a link? I don't have the link to the demo.
Craig
On 07/22/2013 07:13 AM, Charles Francis wrote:
Shows COP of 5
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
No idea how to get to this on line. Sorry.
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
Today is the break-out day. Two groups, both getting high power, high
quality results?
People will start to take a lot more notice.
Craig
, then that's the best sign of all that the results are what
they appear to be.
Craig
On 07/23/2013 01:10 PM, Charles Francis wrote:
Test is looking professional so far and promising. One concern for me
though is that after all that careful flow calibration, they switched
the water flow from bucket
Looks like ignition!
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
On 07/23/2013 03:52 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
See my Steam Calculator at http://tinyurl.com/def-1240
I added the reported input temperature (ambient isn't used)
COP -- Water : 3.8 Steam: 13.8
Can you publish the calculations you use for water and for steam?
Thanks,
Craig
calories / minute =
57,500 calories / minute X 60 minutes = 3,450,000 calories / hour =
3,450,000 calories / hour X 1.163E-6 kWh / calories =~ 4,000 kWh/h
Craig
On 07/23/2013 03:52 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
See my Steam Calculator at http://tinyurl.com/def-1240
I added the reported input
On 07/23/2013 04:17 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
In any event, calculating the COP as if it were water is a MAJOR
under-estimate.
Did they mention this? That they are underestimating like this?
Otherwise, it makes them look sloppy.
Craig
For those that wanted an independent replication of Rossi's experiment,
this was it, aside from the write-up. They replicated the process from
the ground - up, in two years.
Are they planning to write-up the process, or are they trying to keep it
secret, too?
Craig
Lewan: Calculations based on heating water only. However, at the
output I only saw steam. No water dropping.
https://twitter.com/matslew/status/359784137680367616
and total, independent, replication of Rossi's method;
even if they don't plan to write it up.
Craig
/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
of stimulus if they haven’t
already done so.
Fran
Didn't Rossi use this method in the Oct 6, 2011 demo? He called it an
'RF Generator, which he brought in when it appeared the heating wasn't
going to start the reaction as fast as he had hoped.
Craig
On 07/25/2013 09:55 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a better test than the one that Levi and company performed. This
is a complete and total, independent, replication of Rossi's method;
even if they don't plan
. The only thing the
critics can say now is that both Rossi and Defkalion are defrauding us.
There is no other explanation than the obvious.
Everyone who's been following this for years should watch this demo.
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
=HHEtnTO3h6s
The video quality is not as good as the videos at
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
I can't read the screen very well.
Craig
. (Presuming that Mats' calculation
of the spark power is wrong).
I read that Defkalion answered Mats Lewan's objection to the HV power.
There is apparently a 20% duty cycle; so Mats calculated input power
should have been divided by 5.
I can't remember where I read this, however.
Craig
://matslew.wordpress.com/
Defkalion, at the beginning of the demonstration, made a comment that
this was a gift they were giving to the skeptics.
Craig
or two, they did
not show the steam output.
Mats Lewan did observe that there was NO water in the steam during the
hot part of the run.
Craig
On 07/29/2013 06:07 PM, Craig wrote:
Mats Lewan did observe that there was NO water in the steam during the
hot part of the run. Craig
At the beginning of the demonstration, they also manually checked the
flow against the meter, by measuring the weight of the water after two
minutes of flow
was
vaporized, the output thermal power would have been above 27 kW.
http://matslew.wordpress.com/
Craig
of observing excess power is high compared to Pd-D20
systems. On the whole, the system appears to be much more robust and
easily amenable to experimental investigation.
Craig
On 07/30/2013 08:01 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com mailto:djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote
They were pumping about 500 mL / minute, with some minor adjustments to
maintain core temperature.
Craig
On 08/06/2013 11:05 AM, David Roberson wrote:
I am having a difficult time reconciling your calculation with what
DGT shows in the video. I recall them stating that .5 liters per
minute
I just came across this. Is this legit?
http://nationalreport.net/breaking-fukushima-crisis-escalates-tons-radioactive-waste-released-pacific-causes-ocean-boil/
Craig
Nevermind... It's a parody site.
Craig
On 08/31/2013 01:03 PM, Craig wrote:
I just came across this. Is this legit?
http://nationalreport.net/breaking-fukushima-crisis-escalates-tons-radioactive-waste-released-pacific-causes-ocean-boil/
Craig
/climate/index.php?wfo=mkx
Craig
opinions, and
independent values, then allow all people to pursue their own values,
and stop enforcing your values on others. We can work together where we
agree; and work separately where we differ.
Craig
movements based on the
Austrian School of Economics and its philosophy of government are not
only doomed, they are accomplices.
It sounds like you're threatening me directly...
Craig
. Hell, I might even agree with some of
these plans and choose to opt-in, but if we want a society where
everyone is treated as political equals, then we have to stop demanding
that those who choose to opt-out, be forced to opt-in.
Craig
as much, because the new $100 will be spent into
society and will bid up the prices.
Money is not wealth. Wealth is the goods and products that people
create; and the services they provide.
Craig
to
participate in your plan, because coercion is not making things any
better for anyone.
Craig
On 10/21/2013 03:59 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Who wants to slow down technology? I want to stop the subjugation of
people through threats of violence.
You seem obsessed by this notion. No one threatens you today
, and is part of the problem.
Craig
, and this was a federal tax which didn't imburse local
municipalities in any significant way until the 1970s. Which taxes on
the wealthy do you think led America out of squalor?
Craig
On 10/21/2013 05:23 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh course I know you disagree. But by what authority can you and your
associates decide the rules that I am to follow, when I can't
decide the
rules that you
be restricted? We need a firm measurement
to untangle this mess. :)
Dave
I saw a study done a couple of years ago, and I don't remember the
procedure, but they concluded that gravity travels at the speed of
light, with a margin of error of plus or minus 50%.
Craig
the plant
remaining 10 light years away, as they accelerate. They see it becoming
much closer than that, as they approach light speed.
Craig
becomes
infinite, preventing any further increase in speed.
Craig
I apologize for correcting you. I didn't read your whole post. I think
you have it right.
Craig
On 11/15/2013 05:23 AM, Craig wrote:
On 11/15/2013 01:44 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Steven,
The hypothetical ship is undergoing an acceleration of 10 G's.
This is determined by an accelerometer
to subsequently spell out) one of the
four players. I heard Brillouin which McKubre is involved in, Mill's
BLP company, and Rossi's efforts. But who is the fourth player?
Defkalion was the other major player.
Craig
Craig
So if Rossi sold the rights to the product, then doesn't this mean that
he's out of the business? If so, then it seems like quite a waste of
time. If the product is credible, then he threw away billions.
Craig
On 01/24/2014 04:38 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
This gives Rossi a lot
they are, but
if I were Rossi, I would hold out for billions. Not right away, of course.
- Jed
Maybe, but it seems highly unlikely that Industrial Heat has access to
that kind of money. Not too many people have access to 'billions'.
Craig
invested in Industrial Heat
LLC.
Craig
1 - 100 of 579 matches
Mail list logo
