of bias current and charge buildup that
would be interpreted as a positive hit by the electronics. I could reversed
the polarity but that does not remove the charge buildup problem. Not sure
if this would work. More experiment is required.
- Original Message -
From: Mark
Kewl!
And so kind of them to name it after this forum!
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Ron Wormus [mailto:prot...@frii.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 11:18 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:A new use for the Vortex ... Vortex Radio Waves
Really creative!
New picture of atomic nucleus emerges
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-picture-atomic-nucleus-emerges.html
.a quarter of the nucleons in a dense nucleus exceed 25 percent of the
speed of light, turning the picture of a static nucleus on its head.
Hell, I could have told then that!
It is most likely a phishing expedition!
I've been in the Collective for several years and have *never* seen that
kind of msg from eskimo.com (the domain where this mail-list is hosted).
Any emails asking for username/password should be ignored! Legit companies
will never ask you to
Just fwding this from zt. it went to my personal email but could be of
interest to the Collective.
-mark
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=vitl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fvatl
yvietnam.org%2Fforum%2Fshowpost.php%3F%26p%3D83599%26postcount%3D6
on their
sides at various inclinations described in the figure by the angles phi and
theta. In this way, the researcher can tune the interaction-force on demand.
end excerpt
I wonder if they can do this with just a single atom, of any flavor?
-Mark
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Guys, can you please move any further discussion about web-tools to
vortex-B???
-Mark
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 5:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Requesting recommendations on Web Authoring tools
801 - 807 of 807 matches
Mail list logo
