measurement system which proves the Prometheus Effect
at the heart of the SMOT device is OU.
Greg
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
am Randy Elston Hargraves
in Oklahoma USA
1(405) 354-0044 Cell
I feel Cheated
Hi Randy,
You need to checkout the site I have created which has
ample proof that the Prometheus Effect, at the heart
of the SMOT device, is OU:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prometheus_effect/
You will get your
Hi Terry,
In the message I gave you credit for the stepped
magnet arrays used my some SMOT builders but I will
remove the message as requested.
All the best,
Greg Watson
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--- William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Prometheus Effect wrote:
Or is this just another of those measurement OU
claims which cannot
self-act to perform continuous work (minutes or
hours long) against
friction?
Hi Bill,
Please checkout the data on the site.
Now
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I ask again is the PROMETHEUS EFFECT?
I only know that Prometheus showed man how
to use fire. So What is his effect?-ges
Hi,
The Prometheus Effect allows a permanent magnet to
lift a ferromagnetic mass against gravity
--- Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the height of lift vary with the particular
planet?
Hi Terry,
Sure does ;-)
Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't take this to mean I think the effect
can't be real. As
always, experiment trumps theory. I'm just pointing
out that if the
effect _is_ real, then it is revolutionary on a far
more fundamental
level than such mundane
--- William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the current best record for number of
roll-arounds (or
time length in operation) with multiple ramps in the
closed-loop
configuration?
Hi Bill,
I can only report on what I achieved and from memory
it was not stable. To do this required a
--- Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How much energy is required to push the ball back to
the starting position? It's trivial to redirect the
ball, recovering the kinetic energy. That's your
input energy. Pushing the ball under the ramp will
no doubt take some energy. Making the ball go
--- William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Prometheus Effect wrote:
I can only report on what I achieved and from
memory
it was not stable.
So then, stable or not, what was *your* record for
number of roll-arounds?
Hi Bill,
Sorry but I don't have my original
now; just position themagnets along the rim's
path, and we could settle this close-the-loop
question in short order.
Hi Bob,
The Prometheus Effect involves gravity and requires a
exit at 90deg to the main inline field.
I wish it was as easy as your idea,
Greg
Find local movie times
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Beaty wrote:
That is what I love about computers. They never
forget! If we ever win the
CF wars, all of the stupid comments by harsh
opposition skeptics will be
preserved for posterity.
Hi Jed,
You once posted me a copy of the SMOT
Guys,
I would like to enlist the aid of some of the members
of the OU / Free Energy community to independently
verify the virtually no magnetic dragback exit of the
Prometheus Effect. To that end I will provide a SMOT
device and the new lossless measurement system at no
cost. In return you
Hi Mike,
You will get your SMOT kit and the new measurement
system in July or earlier. Just send me your delivery
address. I made this statement in the home page of the
Prometheus Effect site.
Greg
--- Mike Carrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what about those who paid for the original SMOT
--- William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Prometheus Effect wrote:
Provide some high-quality documentation of
your 1997 claims of closed-loop operation, or admit
that it never occurred.
Hi Bill,
I'm in the process of making the SMOT kits and the new
measurement system
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prometheus Effect a.k.a. Greg Watson wrote:
Hi Jed,
You once posted me a copy of the SMOT review Chris
Tinsley did for IE. Could you please do that again?
I would like to review it and post a few comments.
By the way, can you provide
Squires as an
independent Prometheus Effect verifier? You will need
to join the PE group.
Cyril pointed out that there are places on exit
where there would be no magnetic force.
Cyril's force analysis was done on the forces along
the ramp and not as the ball drops vertically. I think
the slow
will then publish my
review and send a copy to Infinite Energy for their
action. Hopefully they will do the right thing,
publish my review and help to set the record straight
that the Prometheus Effect at the heart of the SMOT is
OU.
Any help would be appreciated as when I asked Jed
Rothwell
Akira Kawasaki wrote:
April 31, 2005
Greg,
Contact IE by e-mail, phone or fax. They can
satisfy your need for the issue. IE has a website.
Hi Akira,
IE can supply ths issue in question.
Thanks,
Greg
Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg
Find local movie times and
--- Public [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen this?:
http://www.reidarfinsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html
Hi Craig,
Not to be a wet blanket but that big spring in the
central column could be a worry?
Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg
Find local movie times and
Guys,
How would you calculate the final KE of a vertically
falling ball assuming you know the mass of the ball, g
and you could accurately measure the transit time of
the last say 25mm of the vertical drop?
Then, assuming you knew the total drop distance, would
not a lower measured KE (than PE
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop cross-posting to Vortex and other
groups.
OK.
Just measure x0, x1, t0, and t1, plug them in, and
you get v0. Then
to find v1,
v1 = v0 + a*Dt
Hi Stephen,
I'm using Final Velocity = average velocity + g *
transit time / 2.
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly right. What is it strange is that many of
the people making these claims, including some well
educated ones, do not seem to realize this.
Hi Jed,
So can I ship you a SMOT and the measurement system so
you can prove the data I'm seeing is not
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously the KE is actually a little higher than
that if the horizontal velocity is nonzero,
There is almost no horizontal ball velocity on exit
but the ball does have some rotational KE which I
don't attempt to measure. To get a good exit all
Guys,
Here is a ramp climb and drop at 1 frame / sec.
http://www.myfilehut.com/userfiles/prometheus_effect/ClimbandDropFramebyFrame.avi
Note the ball has no starting KE and no horizontal KE
on the vertical exit. The rotation about the exit
point does induce some rotational KE but I don't
25 matches
Mail list logo
