This is really good news Jed.
Now the calorimeter seems to be working in the right way [stable ambient
and enough time, as we said at the beginning of the discussion]. From your
short data presented I suppose it took 7 hours for the cooling liquid to
reach a final stable average temperature. From
Great
Your results look very meaningful, Dave.
We are still thinking about the problem of not uniform temperature across
the reactor vessel just after the power pulse are applied, but it seems to
me that you have solved them.
I hope to read the full report very soon.
GG
2015-01-16 5:29
Jed,
you continue to be wrong.
If you have constant ambient and constant heat source the temperature
difference will stay constant. No exponential decrease. Sorry.
2015-01-14 21:16 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I wrote:
2) The cooling body has no internal source of heat
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
you continue to be wrong.
If you have constant ambient and constant heat source the temperature
difference will stay constant. No exponential decrease. Sorry.
If the power remains the same for the entire test
. Nevertheless, I will keep an open mind and give your model an
opportunity to show its strength.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 13, 2015 4:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic
and Mizuno the results, hopefully at ICCF-19. Will you be there?
Regards
2015-01-13 16:52 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
I could say that this is false but I will be fair and I will say that
this is not true. From the missing file
Dear Jed,
in your report you write:
*The temperature rose for 1.5 hours until it stabilized 0.6°Cabove room
temperature (Fig. 19.) It stabilized because heat losses equal the power
from thepump. In other words, with low input power after 1.5 hours, this
system acts as an
range and a damaged pump. These types of questions
remain unanswered.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jan 12, 2015 5:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Dave,
you
Sent: Tue, Jan 13, 2015 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The refrigerator example is quite evident, but is unfit to our
situation, by various causes. The main one is that there you have an abrupt
temperature stay
constant. Why do you insist on that? Ask Dave...
Maybe you can trust him better than me.
Regards
2015-01-13 20:05 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The refrigerator example is quite evident, but is unfit to our situation
is turned off?
Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jan 13, 2015 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote
Dave,
as promised and while you still insist saying that we were deeply wrong, we
have put on-line two different updates
1)
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/further-measurements-on-the-md-6k-n-pump-used-by-tadahiko-mizuno/
2)
speed).
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The major result is that we measured 43°C in the pump body very close to
the water so it is really easy to understand that, despite what Jed says,
the pump motor
can perform to help verify the
facts. I like the horizontal flow demonstration that you used to measure
the mass flow rate for the 5 mm tubing. Can you do the same with 10 mm as
a beginning step?
Best Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
12, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dave,
as promised and while you still insist saying that we were deeply wrong,
we have put on-line two different updates
1)
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/further-measurements-on-the-md-6k-n-pump-used-by-tadahiko-mizuno
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The major result is that we measured 43°C in the pump body very close to
the water so it is really easy to understand that, despite what Jed says,
the pump motor delivers a lot of heat to the water . . .
You
Alain,
I'm not accusing anyone of having hidden an excel file; I'm just saying
that Jed removed that file from his archives where I found it several weeks
ago. I don't know why he removed it, maybe he could explain...
Jed says it is of no importance to the present discussion; I find it of
of other evidence.
sorry to compare Rossi with you.
(Rossi will survive that comparison.)
2015-01-10 12:26 GMT+01:00 Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com:
Alain,
I'm not accusing anyone of having hidden an excel file; I'm just saying
that Jed removed that file from his archives where I found
a negative excess heat?
Think about it. Truth is the best for anybody.
Regards
2015-01-10 16:16 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
. . . for example what about the heat transferred from the motor to the
water? Jed says it is negligible
Jed,
just as an example, in the missing file, in the row 989 which corresponds
to 24131.191 seconds the room temperature is 18.78 °C and the water
temperature is 21.90. Doing some mathematics we get that the temperature
difference is 3.13 °C that appears to be higher than what you say.
Why did
many realize.
Take care and lets uncover the real facts,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 8, 2015 4:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Dear Dave,
I do
Dear Dave,
you still insist on your calculation neglecting what I wrote to you in an
earlier message regarding the fact that increasing the pipe the power goes
to zero when calculated according to your mathematics.
We have just published the new experiment with the theory and diagrams
behind it.
results. We
could discuss in detail the matter at ICCF-19.
*Many thanks*
2015-01-10 18:28 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
just as an example, in the missing file, in the row 989 which corresponds
to 24131.191 seconds the room temperature
to be barrowed.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2015 7:25 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Alain,
I must confess that I've some problems
:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
wrote:
Two of us measured and discovered the Defkalion trick in the water flow
measurement (or do you think it was really Gamberale?); if you like I can
send you the proofs privately.
Hi Giancarlo,
Thank you for the careful
Peter,
I fully agree with you: the time will tell the truth. The cause was a water
wave bouncing forth and back so that to provide extra pulses in the
flowmeter. There is an oscilloscope photo taken by connecting it to the
flowmeter.
What you simply miss is that it was very simple to obtain a
*Kinetic energy of the water carries the power into the storage
medium so it can
be calculated by the reliable formula E=1/2*M*V^2.*
This is completely wrong: the pump power is not transformed into
kinetic enegy of the water, otherwise you will get after a while an
infinite velocity, not only for
energy of water
that is about to enter the intake pipe of the pump. Do you agree that the
difference in heat must be deposited within the standing liquid?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 8, 2015 10
-01-08 16:39 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
This is completely wrong: the pump power is not transformed into kinetic
enegy of the water, otherwise you will get after a while an infinite
velocity, not only for the water inside the tube
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jan 8, 2015 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised
Sorry Dave but I do not agree at all with your DIY physics about
pumps.
1) We
The following paper:
Low Energy Neutron Production by Inverse-beta decay in Metallic Hydride
Surfaces
S. Ciuchi http://arxiv.org/find/nucl-th/1/au:+Ciuchi_S/0/1/0/all/0/1, L.
Maiani http://arxiv.org/find/nucl-th/1/au:+Maiani_L/0/1/0/all/0/1, A. D.
Polosa
I think Rossi is adding to English more words, coming in some sense from
Italian, than in the last 5 centuries.
Clownerie has been translated by Akira into travesty. Clownerie is another
Rossi's invention, if I can imagine what take places into his brain I think
the right path is clown ==
equal sign has a different meaning from what I could imagine.
I've still some concerns about the assumptions, but this is another issue,
I'll keep you informed if I found other discrepancies.
Thank you for your attention
Grazie dell'interesse, Giovanni.
2012/1/31 Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms
I've a problem with the WL theory. I read carefully their published paper
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2006/2006Widom-UltraLowMomentumNeutronCatalyzed.pdf
and I found what seems to me to be a major flaw.
I'm sure I'm totally wrong but I would ask you to check.
It is only arithmetics, no
I don't know if it was already reported but I found some oddies in the
hydrogen consumption
October 6th test, from Lewan's report
Weight hydrogen bottle:
- before filling: 13606.4 grams
- after filling: 13604.9 grams
Total loaded: 1.5 grams
Pressure H2 Bottle: 55 bar Reduced: 15 bar
October
35 matches
Mail list logo
