http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wuTyPEpJ0g
Harry
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The macro version appears to be a Rodin coil
http://peswiki.com/images/5/5a/Rodin_coil_torus_jp70.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton?
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:48 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I calculate them. If you have access to a windows machine, you can
download the
program from http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Isotopes.zip (if it doesn't
work,
please let me know ;)
(Elements beyond Uranium are excluded).
Sorry, It
not explain how no
radioactive isotopes are produced.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
Recent evidence indicates the charge radius of proton is smaller in the
presence of a muon than in the presence of an electron.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:16 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:12:21 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Ni62 + H -- Cu63
63Cu is a stable copper isotope
Pd106 + H -- Ag107
1H+106Pd = 107Ag + 5.788 MeV (exothermic)
Pd108 + H -- Ag109
1H+108Pd =
, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
Ni62 + H -- Cu63
63Cu is a stable copper isotope
Pd106 + H -- Ag107
Pd108 + H -- Ag109
107Ag and 109Ag are stable silver isotopes.
Standard binding theory says these should be endothermic reactions but if
the charge radius of the proton is not fixed
Washington Post Poll
Vote on this question:
What energy sources offer the most promise for the U.S. economically and
environmentally?
Registration is required to vote, but currently LENR has the most number of
votes.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Washington Post Poll
Vote on this question:
What energy sources offer the most promise for the U.S. economically and
environmentally?
Registration is required to vote, but currently LENR has the most number
of votes
-poll/
On 6/14/13 11:49 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The way this works is that readers submit a comment describing their
preference and each comment receive votes. The comments with the most votes
appears at the top and it is for LENR. In addition, I browsed all the
comments and it appears
Data - Drop the shields
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHoXUP804vg
Harry
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.comwrote:
Good News!
In a google hangout that just occured, Vice President Al Gore
said that there have been VERY interesting developments
in cold fusion recently, and he used significant tonal inflection
to emphasize his
? Heck no! They just turn
their backs to him and continue with their selfish hard heartedness.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
Data - Drop the shields
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHoXUP804vg
Harry
Wanted: Pilot Customer for ECAT 1 MW plant
Hydro Fusion is looking for a Pilot Customer for the first ECAT 1 MW Plant
to operate in Sweden. The customer will only pay for the energy produced by
the ECAT, i.e. Hydro Fusion and Leonardo Corporation will take
responsibility for all associated costs
water gong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SisUWArnlGg
Harry
physicist can find a better way to explain it... this way to
explain is how I understand it.
What I take from that explanation is mostly modesty about lattice QM, like
one should have in closed place crowd prediction.
2013/6/9 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Another thing I find puzzling
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This may be a little off topic but anyway . . . On NHK the other day I saw
a documentary about food exports and high-tech agriculture in the
Netherlands. Here is a web page about it:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Take your time, but it would be nice to read the source.
The headings that set out the three miracles in his book are (pp.
111-13
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems to me if he was certain they were impossible he would
have explicitly mentioned violation of conservation of momentum/energy
since
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:40 AM, francis froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
On Thursday June 6th Harry said
Ok, I realise why we diverge in our approaches to your model. I don't start
with the assumption that the lattice is in a state of thermal equilibrium.
I assume the
Peter,
Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are:
(1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * *
(2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.)
(3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space
In other places I have seen Huizenga three miracles written like
PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are:
(1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * *
(2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.)
(3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space
In other places
If He took off by itself, how fast would it be moving?
Detecting and measuring the speed of He particles
would be a way checking for a conservation of momentum violation.
harry
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013
Wanted, dead or alive (not dead and alive)
http://www.wm.edu/news/stories/2013/scientific-american-article-explains-a-
way-to-resolve-quantum-state-paradoxes-123.php
The weird part is this: As long as the box is sealed, you have to
consider the cat to be both dead and alive. That’s what life is
No, sorry.
I first saw it on the newsstand and just flipped through it.
Harry
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Teaser. Do you have a subscription?
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:29:30 PM
Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue
quickly.
I have an early edition (he revised it later) but it's
Ed,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Harry, you don't seem to understand the concept of work. Consider that
atoms in a lattice are held together by a force. They vibrate and this
vibration contains energy as the heat capacity. Is a piece of salt doing
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Harry, you don't seem to understand the concept of work. Consider that
atoms
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-4/271-s-g-cells-preliminary-test-findings-for-run-2
The first test run of the Steel and Glass cell suggested that it took
approximately 6% more power to maintain the same volume of water at the
same temperature in the control cell when
I wonder what Randall Mills would predict.
Harry
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.netwrote:
FYI:
http://phys.org/news/2012-11-fundamental-electromagnetism.html
** **
Possible connection to Mills’ f/H or inverse rydberg states???
** **
If
A visual demonstration would impress the masses.
Use a real ecat and a dummy ecat with the same input power to inflate a
balloon
The real ecat will inflate the balloon faster.
Harry
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com
Materials in which heat flows perpendicular to an electric current could
lead to better devices for cooling electronics.
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/63
Harry
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
But I think you misunderstood. I was not referring to new science
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The tactic of the obstructionist is to avoid dealing with the case
The avoidance here is from the true believers who insist that any
alternative
Ed,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00
A sign of something to come or a sign of something that was missed !?
;-)
Harry
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Craig Brown cr...@overunity.co wrote:
FRENCH
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:OT: scrabble challenge
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, June 03
frigorific!
Harry
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Good points Alain. I suppose it may all become a mute point as more
positive results roll in, and if there is a running reactor that the public
can visit.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alain Sepeda
...
- Brad
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
With the seven letters LENR CF H make a word.
Harry
Metrologically speaking, it doesn't matter if an entity creates excess
heat by violating the laws of thermodynamics. What matters is that our
instruments work according to the laws of thermodynamics. As long as they
do, we can determine with confidence how much excess heat the entity
creates.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is pull
away with a force
Jones,
Did he make the background measure and the active run measure with the
detector in the same place and same orientation?
If he did, then the dip recorded during the active run would mean an
_active_ ecat can reduce background radiation.
Harry
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Giving Rossi the benefit of the doubt, the fact that an
external stimulus is required in the form of resistance heating (also heat,
as has been pointed out), this seems to indicate that one of two phenomena,
or both,
have gamma rays been detected coming from these bubbles?
If not then the phenomena is probably another example of LENR-CF-f/h-
Harry
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Joe Hughes jhughe...@comcast.net wrote:
Interesting video clip featuring Dr. Seth Putterman describing his
thoughts on A
With the seven letters LENR CF H make a word.
Harry
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
you have a point.
a good idea for latter as someone said in a forum is:
- to invite students who will play the skeptics, with stupid ideas, most
stupid, some not so stupid... with naive, not far from the one of
A single wire does have a magnetic field.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Manoderecha.svg
Harry
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:51 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I guess I fell for the word trap without looking at the drawing. What
was discussed about the magnetic fields of
Peter,
If it will be a real demo why didn't she write that?
I listened to Sterling Allan's audio interview from two months ago and the
representative from Defkalion stated quite clearly
that they intended to set up working device at National Instruments Week
this august. Perhaps
Defkalion is no
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
The simple fact is that the measurements made and reported are woefully
inadequate to exclude deception.
Unless Rossi tells people how to build an ecat or starts selling them, no
test will ever exclude deception.
It
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Skeptics would change their minds in a heart beat with good evidence, just
as they did in 1908. But there is nothing that will convince true believers
in cold fusion that they are wrong.
You should persuade the
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Likewise if the testers concluded that the ecat did not work, the true
believers will reject the assessment
because they consider the testers untrustworthy.
There have been
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The ultimate source of energy cannot be determined as of now but
Rossi’s hundreds of hours of operation at kilowatt levels with no gammas
clearly
Extra heat in the form of thermal pulse might disrupt a resonance that was
enabling the production excess heat.
Harry
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:56 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote:
Apparently there's two threads of thought here:
a: Apply heat to make the process start,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling
power.
Exactly. The whole thing is nuts. If it really needed
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest
theories come out.
Yes, I know that happens sometimes. And sometimes
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I have no
problem using electricity to initiate the ecat. But if it's a source of
energy, it should behave like one and be able to at least power itself.
As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling power.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
. . . If you unplug a Rossi cell and try to make it self-sustain without
input, it will melt.
An analogy to fire may be
The COP will be higher outside on a wintery windy night.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical point
at
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
If we abandon this rule, or if we call it hand waving as Gibbs does
here, progress in science will come to a halt.
I think there's been a
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is pull away
with a force and let go, a resonance wave will pass down the line. Each
ball will alternately move away and then toward its neighbor. If
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
I suspect hand waving began as a derisive reference to occult
activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
You would
Among cheeses, I believe Stilton has one of the highest energy densities.
Harry
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:36 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The report included a couple of graphs on page 27. One was power out per
their measurement, the other power in. The mere fact that the
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I wrote:
But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the experimental
evidence for LENR will be convinced.
I mean the totality of the evidence, as Mallove called it. People such as
Cude deny that there is
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
multiple violations of rule 2.
(I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.)
Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
Rule 2. NO
no, no, no...cheese power requires a cheese sauce! ;-)
Harry
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 29, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
You did not use the potassium based secret sauce that Rossi uses.
How do you know his sauce is potassium
Hmmm when the nickel starts to melt would bubbles of H2 form within the
nickel?
Harry
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
So, are we are suggesting instead a much thinner layer [.3g] spread over
the entire inner surface of the reactor only?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:13 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
We know that Ni powder sinters at the temperature being produce
What about adding some small amount of some other element to raise the
sintering/melting temp; commonly done in alloying.
OOTB suggestion...
Anyone
solution. The melting point is close to
being linear between 1083° and 1453°, the mp of Ni.
Ed Storms
On May 29, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:13 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
We know that Ni powder sinters at the temperature being produce
of this structure and are also trapped. Nevertheless,
the electrons can move freely within each Hydroton, thereby acting as if
the Hydroton were superconducting.
Ed Storms
On May 28, 2013, at 10:23 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
do you agree that what primarily keeps the protons in the gap
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The process you have described
Rossi confuses and annoys many people by being both open and secretive at
the same time.
Harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Nope. Had you been paying attention to the interviews with the testers,
you would have read that quote as #7 in a list of 7. As
From Rossi's perspective there is a danger that and unscrupulous competitor
might place evidence of fraud if he is not careful about who tests his
equipment.
Harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/5/28 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Furthermore, the fact that it was predicted means it's not an
extraordinary claim at all. Everyone expected it. It fit a consistent
picture based on a century of robust experimental science. The 50 years was
spent
so the secret cable is a high voltage cable?
Harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Thank you for being straightforward on both points.
*And now we definitively know that the cable itself is secret.*
**
Of course, that will not bother the majority of
Ed,
do you agree that what primarily keeps the protons in the gap is their
repulsion with the lattice nuclei and what primarily keeps electrons in the
gap is their repulsion with the electron shells around the lattice nuclei?
harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Edmund Storms
The diagram reminds me of constructions consisting of springs and dashpots
in series and parallel which are used to model viscoelastic materials.
see e.g.
http://gertrude-old.case.edu/276/materials/5.fig/05.htm6.gif
http://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0023643808000790-gr1.jpg
His
I think you are bluffing.
harry
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
It's a capacitor in parallel with a resistor. I am underwhelmed.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent
and cannot
interpret the funny symbols? Good grief. There sure are some ripe
steamers on this list. Roberson was bad enough. Then there's ...ah
fergeddit.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013
. Remember, I was not able to
teach him elementary electronic theory.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 1:19 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform,
supports David
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The process you have described has the characteristics of
a ratchet. Curiously, Jones used the ratchet metaphor in another post where
he characterised the effect
sense. But that's OK - QM is
nothing if not unintuitive.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 26, 2013 11:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
On Sat, May 25, 2013
The tiny but regular oscillations of the platform enables the
synchronisation. However I bet if you constantly nudge the platform the
synchronisation will vanish.
Harry
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Best to keep these soldiers off of that long
Andrew, remember the cop is a conservative estimate so it is just a
coincidence that the numbers happen to have those ratios.
Harry
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Ekstrom makes the same point as I have failed to make with Dave (and upon
which nobody else
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
But we have no idea what the emissivity of the paint used in the December
test was, nor whether it was wavelength dependent. There may be a paint
for which an assumption of emissivity of 1 greatly overestimates the
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
But we have no idea what the emissivity of the paint used
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c
From a comment thread on e-catworld:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/rossi-no-longer-controls-e-cat-business/
Pekka Janhunen on May 27, 2013 at 8:01 pm
Off-topic for the thread: the question whether assuming emissivity equal to
one indeed yields to underestimation of the radiated power. Now
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
Josh questions:
“I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. I
don't think we know anything about the
David,
As Joshua has suggested, the authors of the report should consult with an
expert in spectral analysis and include his remarks in their report.
harry
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The question of the emissivity seems to keep rearing its
No knowledge of the waveform would be required if a circuit breaker were
used which trips if more power is getting in than Rossi claims.
Harry
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Probably; in any case, it would be an improvement. The majority of the
paper is
Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 26, 2013 3:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The inanity of the hidden input power hypothesis
what about a fuse? or a light bulb(s)?
harry
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Andrew andrew...@att.net
Racing Towards Very Different Hydrogen Futures
Yet, while Aston Martin and the Rapide S were preparing to make history
in Germany, south of the Alps in Ferrara, Italy, just below a bend in the
River Po, in a nondescript industrial park, a potentially far more historic
test of hydrogen technology
cognitively
constrained.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 26, 2013 3:15 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The inanity of the hidden input power hypothesis
I am not an EE...i'm not even a electrician...but I thought
You are neglecting the I-can't-see-inside sceptics.
Harry
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
Seems to me that if active cooling control is used as the only control
input, thus satisfying the unplug it! sceptics (and I'm one of them),
then it only has a
commercial free?!
;-)
harry
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
6 months of live streaming!
2013/5/26 pagnu...@htdconnect.com
Courtesy of Pure Energy Systems News -
QA With Hanno Essen Regarding Recent E-Cat Test
I didn't know.
One of the suggested tricks involved two clamp on ammeters and three wires
and a hidden circuit, but as you say three clamp on ammeters were used -
one for each wire - so that particular trick would not work.
harry
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Jed Rothwell
Axil,
This addresses an earlier post you made.
The boiling point of nickel is about 2700 C and the melting is about 1400
C. Ecat fuel never reaches temperatures close to the boiling point so you
don't need to suppose bubble formation is suppressed because
the fuel behaving a like a superfluid.
said a superfluid can't boil (i.e.
produce bubbles) when heated. My point is ordinary fluids don't bubble
either until they reach their boiling point, so an absence of bubbles
doesn't prove a fluid is a superfluid.
Harry
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 22, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
I think the structure of the coulomb barrier is open to intrinsic
modification, but the variables governing this possibility cannot be
uncovered by the tools
Tests find Rossi's E-Cat has an energy density at least 10 times higher
than any conventional energy source
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html
Essén said that there are plans to submit the paper to a peer-reviewed
journal, although they understand that it may be
If you want the Ecat tested in what you consider a trustworthy site,
Rossi will have to trust that his ecat will be returned.
Trust an integral part of life, and since science is done by the living
rather than the deceased, trust is also an integral part of science.
Harry
On Thu, May 23, 2013
1 - 100 of 2957 matches
Mail list logo
