Please read what I write. I drew an analogy between the two types of circuits diagrams.
Harry On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: > ** > I think you are ridiculously irrational. *Look at the circuit diagram*. > What precisely is wrong with you? That you are not an EE and cannot > interpret the "funny symbols"? Good grief. There sure are some ripe > steamers on this list. Roberson was bad enough. Then there's ...ah > fergeddit. > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:08 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, > supports David Roberson's linear-response theory > > I think you are bluffing. > > > harry > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: > >> ** >> It's a capacitor in parallel with a resistor. I am underwhelmed. >> >> Andrew >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:55 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, >> supports David Roberson's linear-response theory >> >> >> The diagram reminds me of constructions consisting of springs and >> dashpots in series and parallel which are used to model viscoelastic >> materials. >> see e.g. >> >> http://gertrude-old.case.edu/276/materials/5.fig/05.htm6.gif >> http://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0023643808000790-gr1.jpg >> >> His circuit diagram could be considered an electric model of force >> interaction at the atomic scale within the Ecat's fuel. >> >> >> >> >> harry >> >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> Let's make sure I understand these 4 plots. I understand your diagram >>> thus: >>> >>> The blue square wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the >>> green double exponential. >>> The blue triangular wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the >>> green curve that looks very like the power curve in the report. >>> The toy model describes a thermal simulation which translates electrical >>> input to the device to radiant power output. >>> >>> OK so far? >>> >>> Assuming yes, here's what I think you've shown. The control box >>> consumes power as a square wave (which is what the report measures on the >>> input side), and outputs a triangular wave to the device. The device's >>> output power profile (radiant heat) comes out as per the report. Bazinga. >>> >>> The only problem is that the cable between the control box and the >>> device contains "secrets". That's your next reverse-engineering mission :) >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Alan Fletcher" <a...@well.com> >>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:37 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, >>> supports David Roberson's linear-response theory >>> >>> >> From: "Andrew" <andrew...@att.net> >>> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:53:45 PM >>> >> That's a nice piece of reverse engineering - Kudos. My only issue >>> >> with it is >>> >> the plot in the report, which definitely shows square waves. Mind >>> >> you, these >>> >> were measured on the input side of the control box. So it's possible >>> >> you've uncovered a secret about the actual drive waveform. >>> > >>> > The square waves are the INPUT stimulus. The wavy line (eg plot 8) is >>> the OUTPUT power. >>> > >>> > But the general shape will be similar. >>> > >>> > (I displayed voltage ... equivalent to temperature. I still have lots >>> to do. >>> > >>> >> >> >
