On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 07:30 AM 7/21/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Essen and Kullander:
At the end of the horizontal section there is an auxiliary electric
heater to initialize the burning and also to act as a safety if the heat
Essen and Kullander:
At the end of the horizontal section there is an auxiliary electric heater
to initialize the burning and also to act as a safety if the heat evolution
should get out of control.
This is the first mistake: presumption presented as fact. The presumption is
that there exists
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com wrote:
Essen and Kullander:
At the end of the horizontal section there is an auxiliary electric
heater to initialize the burning and also to act as a safety if the heat
evolution should get out of control.
This is the first
Excuse me Lomax. My last email was directed to Rothwell not yourself. This
email interface is not the best mode of communication.
At 07:30 AM 7/21/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Essen and Kullander:
At the end of the horizontal section there is an auxiliary
electric heater to initialize the burning and also to act as a
safety if the heat evolution should get out of control.
This is the first mistake: presumption
No, not critics. The director of those Swedish physicists denied there
was a contract, Rossi also denied that, and in fact what will happen
is a collaboration of the professors of Bologna and Uppsal to develop
the e-cat.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:54:26 -0300
Von: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: Prof. Kullander now an Ecat critic?
No, not critics. The director of those Swedish physicists denied there
was a contract, Rossi
Not really, but it refers to a post of Krivit. We discussed that last week :)
This is what he writes:
In realtà, sembra che a Uppsala ci stiano nettamente ripensando. Io stesso
avevo scritto la settimana scorsa ai miei colleghi di Uppsala per sentire come
andavano le cose. Avevo sentito parlare di un accordo con Rossi per fare un
test di uno degli E-cat, ma i colleghi
This is not very different from what Krivit did...
19/lug/2011 17:59, Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de ha
scritto:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:54:26 -0300
Von: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Betreff: Re: [Vo]: Prof. Kullander now an Ecat critic?
No, not critics
At 12:49 PM 7/19/2011, Michele Comitini wrote:
Angela,
The article does not say much.  As a matter
of fact Bardi does not give any scientific fact
to confirm what he has written, just rumors
hence just blather on which he bases his bufala (scam) assumption.
You can find him on some
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
In my opinion, Kullander made some mistakes, and he should simply
acknowledge them and move on.
Where, in his report, are these mistakes? Someone here claimed that he
did not measure input power, when the report clearly states he did.
Simple, clean and clear.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
In my opinion, Kullander made some mistakes, and he should simply
acknowledge them and move on.
Where, in his report, are these mistakes? Someone here claimed that he did
not measure
At 03:26 PM 7/19/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
In my opinion, Kullander made some mistakes,
and he should simply acknowledge them and move on.
Where, in his report, are these mistakes?
Someone here claimed that he did not measure
input power, when the report clearly
15 matches
Mail list logo
