can be read.
I couldn't copy from the Non-Final Rejection, but it should be read
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Curious 2003 Cold Fusion Patent Application
Say
At 10:57 PM 12/28/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
Wow.
Rossi had better hope he doesn't get the same examiner. (Particularly
failure to disclose best mode -- which doesn't even have to be
active concealment).
All the prior art stuff is well done.
A couple of quibbles ... rather fatal to
On Dec 29, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 10:57 PM 12/28/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
Wow.
Rossi had better hope he doesn't get the same examiner.
(Particularly failure to disclose best mode -- which doesn't even
have to be active concealment).
All the prior art stuff is
Pardon if this is old news on Vortex, but I was surprised to find this
2003 USPTO patent application --
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2003/0112916.html
Cold nuclear fusion under non-equilibrium conditions
United States Patent Application 20030112916 Kind Code: A1
Inventors:
Keeney,
What a surprise to me!
If cold fusion patents are suddenly allowed, I can not imagine this
kind of patent holding up in general upon challenging in court in
infringement proceedings. The application was made in 2000. Most
everything was invented, published or publicly discussed in
Say, if CF breaks as conventional, and this patent is issued, maybe
this is intended to provide an excuse for the patent office to reject
all subsequent cold fusion patent application claims based on
infringement of prior art, until this patent is successfully challenged.
On Dec 28, 2011,
be read.
I couldn't copy from the Non-Final Rejection, but it should be read
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Curious 2003 Cold Fusion Patent Application
Say, if CF
This patent application seems like one Fleischmann and Pons would have
written as well. Sad that Jones and F-P didn't cooperate and avoid a lot
of wasted time.
Horace Heffner wrote:
Say, if CF breaks as conventional, and this patent is issued, maybe
this is intended to provide an excuse for
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Curious 2003 Cold Fusion Patent Application
Say, if CF breaks as conventional, and this patent is issued, maybe
this is intended to provide
9 matches
Mail list logo