Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-16 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 02/15/2011 02:22 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: Another interesting quote: Please, what do you mean, in this case when you say “power density”? If you mean which volume is necessary per kW of power, I can say about 5 liters per kW,

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know who witnessed it? The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. However, the internal temperature of the machine is reportedly well above 100 deg C. That stands to reason. Even with

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Peter Gluck
180-220 deg C steam will be perfectly OK- at high pressure 10-16 bar. Overheated steam is not economical. Peter On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know who witnessed it? The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. Unless there is significant water

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:07 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know who witnessed it? The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. However, the internal temperature of the machine is reportedly

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: How sure are you it is finely divided nickel? Didn't Rossi say the material only had a gram of Ni? The patent says nickel powder. I think Rossi said there are two mystery elements added to Ni, presumably in small amounts. Brian Ahern and I

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:07 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know who witnessed it? The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. However, the internal temperature of the machine is reportedly

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/15/2011 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Has there been a demonstration with it producing 400 C steam? Do you know who witnessed it? The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. However, the internal temperature of the machine is reportedly well

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: The steam has not been pressurized as far as I know. Unless there is significant water content in the expelled steam, the pressure doesn't matter, or have you forgotten your grade 11 phase diagram again? In real life, I have never heard of a steam

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/15/2011 02:22 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: Another interesting quote: Please, what do you mean, in this case when you say “power density”? If you mean which volume is necessary per kW of power, I can say about 5 liters per kW, just for the thermal power. Eh?? For 12 kW that would be 60

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote: OK, well and good. But you named a specific figure, saying it can easily go above 400 deg C. I wondered if that was based on speculation and Rossi's imprecise assertions about the internal temperature of the device, or it if was based on something

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread mixent
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:22:59 -0900: Hi, [snip] Rossi said there were several grams of Ni. In the cell there are several grams of Ni With 1 gram of Ni the average real production of energy is around 100 kWh“

RE: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Jones Beene
In the FWIW department In the cell there are several grams of Ni With 1 gram of Ni the average real production of energy is around 100 kWh Ok if the value of that energy is about $5.00 to the power plant operator (the grid operator gets the rest) and the value of nickel is $ 13 pound today,

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 02/15/2011 02:22 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: Another interesting quote: Please, what do you mean, in this case when you say “power density”? If you mean which volume is necessary per kW of power, I can say about 5 liters per kW,

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-15 Thread Roarty, Francis X
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:07 Jed Rothwell wrote [snip] I think Rossi said there are two mystery elements added to Ni, presumably in small amounts. Brian Ahern and I suspect one of them is Pd. [/snip] Pd nano powder does sound like a good candidate. Grain size may be important to backfill the

[Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com ...if true then putting Rossi devices in series to achieve superheated steam isn't going to work. Robin, That is sadly the case, and the conversion to electricity is therefore doomed to be at low efficiency. How low? is the question. I hope

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/14/2011 04:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote: BTW there was a recent report (yet to be verified) that Rossi had admitted that the initial design goal is for average COP ~8, P-in (elec) to P-out (therm) or far less than the original of 20 or more. Now why would he want to do that? If he's

RE: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Jones Beene
The reason given was risk of thermal runaway. -Original Message- From: Stephen A. Lawrence BTW there was a recent report (yet to be verified) that Rossi had admitted that the initial design goal is for average COP ~8, P-in (elec) to P-out (therm) or far less than the original of 20

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: The reason given was risk of thermal runaway. If thermal runaway is only a startup issue, cascaded cells might not be an issue. T

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: The reason given was risk of thermal runaway. If thermal runaway is only a startup issue, cascaded cells might not be an issue. T

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
The Rossi reactor was running at 40:1 output the day before the Jan. 14 demo. As often happens with demos, it failed to work as well that day. It did not work at all for a while and the audience was getting rowdy. It can easily go above 400 deg C. Carnot efficiency will not be an issue. The 1 MW

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I have no idea who needs that much hot water. My wife's garden tub. T Considering a Rinnai R94LSi NG. Anyone have one? Should I wait on a Rossi Ecat?

RE: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Jones Beene
Well, it is true that if the only thing needed for the reaction to proceed is to maintain a narrow range of temperatures, say it is between 390C and 400C, which probably aligns with a phase-change in the active material -- then not only can superheated steam provide some cooling but more

RE: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:36 Jones Beene wrote [snip] Well, it is true that if the only thing needed for the reaction to proceed is to maintain a narrow range of temperatures, say it is between 390C and 400C, which probably aligns with a phase-change in the active material -- then not only

Re: [Vo]:Economic Reality setting in

2011-02-14 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 02/14/2011 07:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: The Rossi reactor was running at 40:1 output the day before the Jan. 14 demo. As often happens with demos, it failed to work as well that day. It did not work at all for a while and the audience was getting rowdy. It can easily go above 400 deg