There may be a small indication of progress at Forbes. The author, Gibbs,
called out one of my comments. I believe this is the first time a
positive remark called out (featured).
I think there are fewer rabid attacks in the comments, but it is hard to
judge with only ~20 comments.
Also, miracle
Inconclusive blather. See:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/12/31/2012-the-year-of-cold-fusion/
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Inconclusive blather.
The only thing you can do with inconclusive data -- like Rossi and
Defkalion's.
I agree, Jed.
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness and monitor
their
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him
to witness and monitor
their experiments.
If we learned nothing else from the experiences with Rossi, it should be
that witness and monitor isn't enough.
MY, that was a general challenge. Not specific to Rossi or DGT.
2012/1/1 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
He should publicly issue a challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him
to witness and monitor
their experiments.
If
vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 1, 2012 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Forbes: The Year of Cold Fusion
agree, Jed.
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
echnically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
nomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He
an important LENR goal. The solving of the energy
crisis is at least as important as any of the other prizes awarded.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 1, 2012 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Forbes: The Year of Cold
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness
Yes, but watching paint dry is ultra-exciting if the payoff is trillion$.
Gibbs appears to be happy writing Forbes filler-pieces.
He should get more creative.
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes. It would be Win-Win-Win.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it not happened? Gibbs doesn't seem in any way
reluctant to write in detail about LENR
So why doesn't he throw down the gauntlet?
How hard is that??
Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly
be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it
I agree Gibbs is just writing filler pieces but the way he bends the facts
and creates straw men to aggravate LENR proponents into doing his homework
is infuriating, We never said it was fusion or that it was known physics
-both of which premises he assumes to support his skeptical platform while
Forbes is all about business and investing. I've been a subscriber 25
years. This is my take:
Gibbs is alerting readers that there is a probability that energy
stocks could quickly lose value due to a Cold Fusion device
impacting traditional energy demand. Some believe it is a zero percent
14 matches
Mail list logo
