Well that sucks. I can totally imagine the ending, tho -- the one thing
Abd was really, really poor at was shutting up.
In any case, if a troll (Christian or not, sounds like that's what it
was) provoked someone so badly that both the troll and the target were
banned, that /certainly/
It's about keeping standards... not justifying 2 wrongs.
Abd was banned, I think, 3 years ago, when a Christian creationist was
attacking Abd for being Muslim and Abd was defending his religion
relentlessly, but providing historical facts and explaining things in
context. The attack lasted for 2
I dunno -- I looked back a ways and didn't see anything interesting from
Che, and saw a bunch of trolling garbage.
And */Abd was banned??/* When was that? And why? He was the most
long winded poster I've encountered in a long time, and a bit
tendentious, but his posts were generally on
I think he posted useful comments before and there was a trouble maker here
before, way worse than this, bad mouthing Abd due his religion. So, unless
Abd is unbanned, I cannot see fair grounds to ban Che.
2016-06-25 15:23 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence :
> Hallo, Bill! Sorry to
Hallo, Bill! Sorry to bother you about this
"Che" is a pseudonym with no information about the actual person behind
it. That's not forbidden but it's not exactly smiled on either.
"Che" mostly posts troll stuff and ad hominems. No surprise, given the
choice of pseudonym, which is
Ok, so who let the troll in…
From: Che [mailto:comandantegri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; Lennart Thornros
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LERNR and Evil, some info
WTF do you know about anything, eh? Typical knee-jerk crap from people who in
fact
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:
> Che
> How did you become a pro?
> Reading a book?
> That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience
> of physical experiment is what counts.
> Then you will find there are many opinions and
WTF do you know about anything, eh? Typical knee-jerk crap from people who
in fact believe some corporation are going to shower their little LENR
projects with oodles of cash at some point, and make them filthy rich.. So
of course they support this bastard social-economic order, however bad it
is
Che
How did you become a pro?
Reading a book?
That goes a long way, but in the end it is like in science the experience
of physical experiment is what counts.
Then you will find there are many opinions and in my book they are all ok.
Seldom are we 100% right.
On Jun 24, 2016 21:30, "Che"
OT for vortex-l, but a short reply (since an off-hand slagging of
'communism' was prominent in a LENR article):
No good marxist need learn any lessons from poor old East Europeans about
'communism'. We know from long, personal experience with you all, that 99%
of you are clueless about it. All
Guys, what kind of comments are these.?
I have marginal experience from socialistic states from travelling meeting
people and participated in some deflection.
Peter knows this area either he wants it or not.
You might not like his ideas but he certainly have seen it. Because of his
position he has
Dear Che,
what do you want to know about Communism?
my experience with it is from 1948 to 1989 Romanian style.
Feel free to ask anything
Peter
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Che wrote:
>
>
>
>> Gluck is clearly not
Che wrote:
> Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably
> anything else political, for that matter.
>
Well, he did live under communism for a long time, so he can draw no
personal experience.
- Jed
Gluck is clearly not qualified to comment on 'communism' -- or probably
anything else political, for that matter.
I suggest he stick closely to scientific matter, only.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-22-2016-comment-re-lenr-and-evil.html
it is more here than it seems at the first sight
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
15 matches
Mail list logo