On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:19 AM Vibrator ! wrote:
> Thank you - but sorry, what's "MEP"?
>
Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing. He's busy at the moment doing a
computational fluid dynamics analysis for the tunnel ventilation system for
Los Angeles Metro; but, he said it looked interesting and
Thank you - but sorry, what's "MEP"?
Last night i fully resolved the gain principle - it WASN'T caused by the
spin and brake cycles sinking counter-momentum to gravity as intended.
The basis of the system is an interaction that moves a pair of masses
across the diameter of a rotating axis,
I sent it to a friend and co-worker who is a MEP whiz. I'll post his
response here.
Why no prototype ?
Is there a minimum rotor speed necessary to show mechanical gain?
This device doesn't seem too hard to prototype unless the reference to 1000 Hz
implies a rotor turning at 6 RPM.
Vibrator ! wrote:
It's a genuine measurement, of a rig specifically designed to
..at a guess, that "if it works then it validates his 'Eratz gravity'
theory, although Lord knows what it is actually doing one way or the
other.."
I don't get the impression that anyone there's able to follow much if
anything of what i'm doing, and most probably think it's an attempt at a
GPE
What does Grimer think? I believe he's on that list.
Cheers!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:26 AM Vibrator ! wrote:
> ..rather than trying to re-summarise the whole thing here, anyone
> interested should review my current thread on the BWF; currently looking
> at 471 Joules in, for 854 Joules
..rather than trying to re-summarise the whole thing here, anyone
interested should review my current thread on the BWF; currently looking
at 471 Joules in, for 854 Joules out, with an uncertainty of +/- 0.4
Joules, from this interaction:
https://i.ibb.co/BPVMtbV/Fully-Active-low-res.gif
7 matches
Mail list logo
