At 08:57 PM 11/20/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:38 PM,
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
wrote:
Absolutely! Widom-Larsen (where an electron combines with a
Proton to form a Neutron and a Neutrino).
has a critical mass, similar to the Coulomb barrier for regular
fusion.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Are you saying that WL --
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0505/0505026v1.pdf Introduction,
First Column, up to Eqn (3) -- and Reference 1 -- are wrong? (I don't have
access to Ref 1 or a similar well known
(I decided to bypass the Joshua Cude discussion, to get back to the
patent itself)
The text of the application is at
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
Also, since this is a NASA patent, doesn't it have to go through a fairly
rigorous review process? and have some empirical data backing it?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
Sure, but saying it's complex does not make it plausible. WL don't actually
predict any
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
[...]
If there are some empirical data obtained by NASA on lenr or the WL
theory,
I would
In this and previous posts I said a few times that the energy needed for
electron capture by a proton is 780 MeV. That would be something, but it's
actually 780 keV, which is still a lot, and is about 10 times bigger than
what's needed for d-d fusion (less than 100 keV). I hope anyone who
actually
I did recognize, but even so, I am not sure what you mean by energy needed
for capture. For example, in large nuclei, the required energy is 0, since
k-capture doesn't need to be induced or stimulated.
2011/11/21 Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
In this and previous posts I said a few times
I sed:
IMO, if Rossi feels he has successfully pocketed
a few select corporations who believe in his technology
he would give a fart about trying to appease the
scientific establishment.
Jed sed:
He never did a fart about that. If he has customers,
all the more reason to ignore
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Argh! I meant: wouldn't have given a fart! about what the scientific
establishment thought of him. Wouldn't!!!
We get it. Everyone knows Rossi has contempt for scientists. I think he
exaggerates his contempt. I have a feeling he
I do not think this patent application has been posted to Vortex yet:
URL:
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFd=PG01p=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htmlr=1f=Gl=50s1=%2220110255645%22.PGNR.OS=DN/20110255645RS=DN/20110255645
United States Patent Application
Absolutely! Widom-Larsen (where an electron combines with a Proton to form a
Neutron and a Neutrino).
has a critical mass, similar to the Coulomb barrier for regular fusion.
The muon:proton has enough mass, and is known to happen.
But electron:proton doesn't --WL proposes one method of getting
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Absolutely! Widom-Larsen (where an electron combines with a Proton to
form a Neutron and a Neutrino).
has a critical mass, similar to the Coulomb barrier for regular fusion.
Actually, it's about 10 times higher. And it's an
13 matches
Mail list logo
