LEAST significant digit.
On Mar 16, 2012 2:48 AM, Xavier Luminous xavier.lumin...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Off the top of my head I'd like to mention that Benford's Law is
particularly good at rooting out cheaters. Basically, the most
significant digit from a sets of naturally occurring data
ok, I make a mistake.
there is a law that any set of physical value (unbounded), will have the
most significant digit respect a log law.
this case seems different.
and also i should have guessed that vote don't respect that law, since it
is bounded.
however correlations, or indirect values,
Off the top of my head I'd like to mention that Benford's Law is
particularly good at rooting out cheaters. Basically, the most
significant digit from a sets of naturally occurring data tends to
follow a well known power law distribution. This is true for things
like lengths of rivers, street
it seems that in rogue finance, money laundry and rogue business some start
to
invent data that respect that law to look good.
the trick to detect that fake is to use the same rule for the correlation
between data, which might be meaningless, but will respect the low.
the idea of that law is
The reason I'm posting this to vortex-l is that of all the candidates, the
only one that represents a serious threat to establishment science is Ron
Paul.
The basic story is that a signature of vote flipping has turned up --
and the beneficiary in every case of this signature has been Mitt
5 matches
Mail list logo
