I read somewhere that 70% of all papers are not able to be replicated. Or
something crazy like that.
Tom Darden's reptuation is far more valuable than Levi's. It's pretty much
that simple. For Tom Darden to say something is real versus Levi are to
entirely different matters.
Also, Tom
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I read somewhere that 70% of all papers are not able to be replicated. Or
something crazy like that.
Where did you read that, and what sort of papers did it refer to? I believe
I have read that studies in sociology have poor replication rates.
I don't find Levi to be credible! I'm enthusiastic too and want to
believe, but Levi was a very poor choice to be primary author on the paper.
A scientist with a credible track record would be better than Darden, but
Levi is not that scientist.
The CEO of Elforsk, even the Nasa scientist -
Why would you say Levi knows what's in the cell? They specifically say
they don't know in the report.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't find Levi to be credible! I'm enthusiastic too and want to
believe, but Levi was a very poor choice
by Rossi.
Ransom
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 9:43 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Boom - Tom Darden speaks.
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I read somewhere that 70% of all papers are not able
@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Boom - Tom Darden speaks.
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I read somewhere that 70% of all papers are not able to be replicated. Or
something crazy like that.
Where did you read that, and what sort of papers did it refer to? I
believe I
people should separate the idea that the test was screwed up, debunked,
from the fact that all skeptic claims it is screwed up and debunked...
for now, with the parenthesis of alumina closed (low transmitance at IR cam
wavelength) the test is solid.
note also that the skeptic carefull avoid the
Would you find a nuclear PhD scientist who was a member of the Skeptics
Society to be credible? How about a Nuke expert who investigated the
e-cat because it is his duty as a scientist. He also wanted to protect the
University of Bologna’s reputation from a possible fraud. Would such a
person
Original link:
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all
Triangle Business Journal is a credible journal.
“I’m serious — it’s about air pollution and coal,” Darden says. “Our
company is called Industrial Heat. Our job is to
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal fired
electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking about coal
burning just for heat. I suppose this is still a major problem in China.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal
fired electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking
about coal burning just for heat.
I believe he means burning coal and other fossil fuel for all purposes,
including
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
*Our* company.
Exciting times!
He's not relying on some report by a bunch of scientists. Tom Darden is
no fool, He's yale graduate / head of a billion dollar hedge fund.
I am curious Mr. Spinnaker. Why are you so impressed by the
12 matches
Mail list logo
