or runaway scenarios ..probably some control over
the h1/h2 populations and currents not yet studied.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:51 PM
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
The vacuum ma
This also fits reports of life after death lab explosions
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as
is not
possible in the coherent system.
(Sometimes Nature may be nice to us.)
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
Jones, I hate to stick my neck out here, but, I will say that the Holmlid
be that
relativistic conditions and time contraction cause small changes in the
constant effective for any coherent system.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 11:36 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
That was strange my phone sent that before I finished writing.
If Holmlid's results are not a measurement error then I'm not sure if cosmic
mouns could explain the quantity mesons generated together.
I'm not really fixed on any particular ideas I like reading all of them, and
have plenty more
I did mention cosmic muons but I also be remember reading that they have been
mentioned elsewhere in the past i
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:25, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Cooke
>
> Ø It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how
is.
Such directional coupling is necessary in NMR reactions to achieve the
small energy transitions that occur.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 6:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
-Original Message
of photons, with
their alternating, locally orthogonal electric and magnetic fields, would not
be bothered by the expanding space.
Bob Cook
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 11:44 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
This item suggests that the fine constant varies with time. It may be that
> relativistic conditions and time contraction cause small changes in the
> constant effective for any coherent system.
>
If the fine structure
experiment.
Maybe one of you could explain the energy balance, i.e., where the excess
energy comes from?
Bob Cook
From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:37 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
Jones, I’ve never thought that the underlying
So if the SPP is able to accumulate sufficient energy it is able to generate
neutral mesons or signed meson pairs, for example if more than 1 GeV it may
generate a Phi meson with conserved states which then quickly decays to the
kaons and then the other mesons seen by Holmlid?
Would it
Holmlid said that a brief exposure of the catalyst to room light produces a
limited number of mesons. So it sounds like all the photons from the room
light are concentrated to only a few SPPs.
SPPs produce particles like Hawking radiation. It is called hadronization.
See page 8 in this article
nergy state and
>> the highest one? or are there transitions between any of the dense hydrogen
>> states? If it were transitions between various energy states, one might
>> expect to see a spectrum of EM radiation from the Holmlid setup.
>>
>> Bob Cook
>>
>>
It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can generate the
mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on this idea where
mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high energy interactions
with nucleons and require much higher energies than you
regions that
allow this endless chemical reversible reaction. Still very similar to the
original premise behind Lyne atomic furnace and the MAHG..
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir
There is a SPP condensate involved. When UV kight is absorbed by the
condensate, all the photons are concentrated to a few SPPs who form it into
a meson. When there are more photons as provided in a laser shot, more SPPs
can form particles from the "SHARED" energy. The condensate is an energy
From: Bob Cook
Ø
Ø Fran and Jones suggested that the source of the excess energy described by
Holmlid is of a chemical origin (electronic potential chemical energy of dense
hydrogen) and not nuclear potential energy long ago stored in the reactants.
First part of answer: The
A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as a clue to LERN
reproducibility.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-fleischmann-singularity.html#comment-form
Ed Storms can test materials until the cows come home withoul LENR responce
because the key to LENR reproducibility is time.
It
? If it
were transitions between various energy states, one might expect to see a
spectrum of EM radiation from the Holmlid setup.
Bob Cook
From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
[snip] But in effect
energy state and
>>> the highest one? or are there transitions between any of the dense hydrogen
>>> states? If it were transitions between various energy states, one might
>>> expect to see a spectrum of EM radiation from the Holmlid setup.
>>>
>>> Bob
tes, one might
> expect to see a spectrum of EM radiation from the Holmlid setup.
>
> Bob Cook
>
> *From:* Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:08 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, Z
The Holmlid effect is common throughout LERN as stated by the AIRBUS guy.
See how 8 different LENR systems produce the same tell tail indications on
photos, Even Pd/D
http://restframe.com/rf/home.html
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:*
From: Stephen Cooke
Ø It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can generate
the mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on this idea
where mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high energy
interactions with nucleons and require much
hat dense hydrogen
>>>> energy levels are involved in the reaction? The lowest energy state and
>>>> the highest one? or are there transitions between any of the dense hydrogen
>>>> states? If it were transitions between various energy states, one might
>&g
Keep these items(dots to connect) in mind
Two different sources for producing H(0) have been used
for this study. They are similar to a source described in a
previous publication.28 Potassium-doped iron oxide catalyst
samples (cylindric pellets)32,33 in the sources produce the ultradense
H(0)
25 matches
Mail list logo