Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
Ketchum's web site was hacked around the same time that Sasquatch got a real name of Homo sapiens cognatus. http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2013/10/east_texas_researcher_who_prov.php On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: http://dnadiagnostics.com/press.html The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens. end excerpt Actually both a Russian lab and the one above came to the same conclusion. However: http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/bigfoot-dna/ The hair samples that contain only human mtDNA are from a human. The samples from which the nuDNA is isolated are also from humans but with some contaminants or some other animal source mixed in. That seems to be a more parsimonious interpretation. I would like to know more about the source of the DNA, but I guess that will have to wait for the full details to be published. The fact that the human DNA is modern human (hence the need for the alleged hybridization to have occurred so recently in the past) is most easily explained as the source simply being modern humans. end excerpt This could get really interesting. What unidentified hominid could have mated with a human female 15,000 years ago considering they have excluded known hominids?
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
Now they say they have one: http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.mx/2012/12/breaking-quantra-team-may-have-captured.html http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.mx/2012/12/ed-smith-daisy-has-been-moved-to.html
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
And according to the following article, the documentary will include convincing footage: http://doubtfulnews.com/2012/12/bigfoot-dna-results-will-be-accompanied-by-video-footage-of-creatures/
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
Andre the Giant was living proof of a crossover event... On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: And according to the following article, the documentary will include convincing footage: http://doubtfulnews.com/2012/12/bigfoot-dna-results-will-be-accompanied-by-video-footage-of-creatures/
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
Chem sez: Andre the Giant was living proof of a crossover event... It’s my understanding Andre never had any problem finding women who were interested in him. Therefore, Sasquatch’s “sequence” lives on! ;-) Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
quite the tongue twister. harry
Re: [Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: quite the tongue twister. See also Annie May the sea anemone enemy: http://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2005/11/14 - Jed
[Vo]:Sasquatch Sequenced
http://dnadiagnostics.com/press.html The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens. end excerpt Actually both a Russian lab and the one above came to the same conclusion. However: http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/bigfoot-dna/ The hair samples that contain only human mtDNA are from a human. The samples from which the nuDNA is isolated are also from humans but with some contaminants or some other animal source mixed in. That seems to be a more parsimonious interpretation. I would like to know more about the source of the DNA, but I guess that will have to wait for the full details to be published. The fact that the human DNA is modern human (hence the need for the alleged hybridization to have occurred so recently in the past) is most easily explained as the source simply being modern humans. end excerpt This could get really interesting. What unidentified hominid could have mated with a human female 15,000 years ago considering they have excluded known hominids?
