Having just read Mats Lewan's An Impossible Invention I would bet on
Rossi knowing what he is doing. He's been through all this a coupe of
times before. In particular, consider what would have happened if he
had described the E-Cat in sufficient detail that others could make a
working
This patent is a fiasco. I do not know much about patents, but even I knew
about some of the problems David French described.
Rossi is reportedly an experienced businessman. So why did he make such
extreme mistakes?
- Jed
Maybe he has some psychiatric problems? Schizophrenia?
http://www.helpguide.org/mental/schizophrenia_symptom.htm
2014-04-04 10:23 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Rossi is reportedly an experienced businessman. So why did he make such
extreme mistakes?
- Jed
--
Daniel
From: Jed Rothwell
This patent is a fiasco. I do not know much about patents, but even I knew
about some of the problems David French described.
Rossi is reportedly an experienced businessman. So why did he make such
extreme mistakes?
Well, he did not understand how his device
Jones, I believe this is wrong on a couple of counts. First, there is no
non-publication rule, there is the publication rule which says that 18
months after the priority date (usually the date of application), the
patent application is published by the USPTO. Once filed, there is nothing
to
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, I believe this is wrong on a couple of counts. First, there is no
non-publication rule, there is the publication rule which says that 18
months after the priority date (usually the date of application), the patent
application is published by the USPTO. Once
Having a long history with corporate business protection with IP, a couple
of points strike me that I think are getting missed:
- Big business is only protected with a PORTFOLIO of patents - not just a
single patent.
- The bigger the business, the more manpower that can be applied to working
David French wrote this article, and sent me the link:
http://coldfusionnow.org/us-examiner-addresses-andrea-rossi-us-patent-application/
- Jed
Basically, Rossi's soap opera will surely be over in 6 months, at most.
2014-04-02 11:19 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
David French wrote this article, and sent me the link:
http://coldfusionnow.org/us-examiner-addresses-andrea-rossi-us-patent-application/
- Jed
--
Why do you say that?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, Rossi's soap opera will surely be over in 6 months, at most.
2014-04-02 11:19 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
David French wrote this article, and sent me the link:
Whatcha talkin bout Daniel!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw9oX-kZ_9k
2014-04-02 20:05 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
Why do you say that?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Basically, Rossi's soap opera will surely be over in 6 months, at
fully in Rossi's/Industrial Heat's response to the current PO
notice.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application
Basically, Rossi's soap
The text says:
As is usual with a first initiative by a US Patent Office Examiner,
this Office
Action rejects the application. Rossi now has three months from March 26,
2014, extendable upon fee payments up to six months, to file a Response.
Whatever Rossi could do to have a patent, he should do
He could achieve the same by doing nothing since this patent, as it is,
doesn't protect anything. Rossi will be, at least, a victim of himself.
2014-04-02 15:46 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com:
I thought that the original application was vague on purpose. It gave
Rossi more time
From: Susanna Gipp
Whatcha talkin bout Daniel!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw9oX-kZ_9k
The Rossi opera - soapy or riveting, will not end until the technology is
shown to be a complete bust, since it does not exist out there alone. There
is a conforming history - even if the present
I like Jones' analysis. It covers most of it.
I further think that if Rossi does not have a working LENR at least he
believes he has one as there is no way he has completely fooled all
investors involved just sweet talking.
I understand he has made less smart business in the field of garbage and
But they did have patents! But Rossi doesn't have anything. His ecat secret
will be cracked within days or just a few weeks, given the importance of
the invention, the greatest since the domestication of wheat and rice So,
he doesn't have anything. He's naked, he won't profit without a patent.
Andrea Rossi US Patent Application
From: Susanna Gipp
Whatcha talkin bout Daniel!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw9oX-kZ_9k
The Rossi opera - soapy or riveting, will not end until the technology is
shown to be a complete bust, since it does not exist out there alone
WD40 never filed a patent so that no one would know their secret ingredients.
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
WD40 never filed a patent so that no one would know their secret
ingredients.
So, it is a trade secret. That works for a product with a limited market.
If WD40 were worth hundreds of billions, other companies would do a
chemical analysis of it, and then
Hello Jed,
I think it works with a trade secret.
One just need to be ahead of the pack to win.
As a matter of fact a patent might be a disadvantage as you need to give
away some trade secrets.
Many times it is possible to find ways around the patent and perhaps have
an advantage by not having a
---also more dangerous in some folks
minds.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
WD40
Nothing stops China. They took microscopic slices of the Intel 8080
microprocessor and reconstructed the masks required to back engineer
the chip. Cheap knock offs were shipping within a year of the
introduction of the chip.
Wasn't it SU?
2014-04-02 22:49 GMT-03:00 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
Nothing stops China. They took microscopic slices of the Intel 8080
microprocessor and reconstructed the masks required to back engineer
the chip. Cheap knock offs were shipping within a year of the
introduction of
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
But they did have patents! But Rossi doesn't have anything. His ecat secret
will be cracked within days or just a few weeks, given the importance of
the invention, the greatest since the domestication of wheat and rice
The fundamental misstep of Rossi was this:
The specification shall contain a written description of the invention,
and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear,
concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to
which it pertains, or with which it
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The Rossi opera – soapy or riveting, will not end until the technology is
shown to be a complete bust, since it does not exist out there alone.
Both riveting and weighed down with some longueurs. When the news comes
in,
If the e-Cat pans out - not just a soap opera, but a fundamental
re-evaluation of the how we should investigate and
perceive physical reality itself.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I was not thinking deeply. Just evaluating Rossi's behavior.
2014-04-03 0:15 GMT-03:00 Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com:
If the e-Cat pans out - not just a soap opera, but a fundamental
re-evaluation of the how we should investigate and
perceive physical reality itself.
--
Daniel
29 matches
Mail list logo
