In reply to francis 's message of Tue, 3 May 2011 06:09:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Scott and I have collaborated and communicated at length regarding a Casimir
theory based on relativistic contraction of the longer vacuum wavelengths
which still appear full length to an observer inside the cavity
in the cavity... which as I have said previously is more in keeping
with the changes in energy density, anomalous increases in C transition time
thru the cavity as measured externally and
Claims of variation of radioactive decay rates.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir
[mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:53 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities!
If ZPE radiation is being upshifted in a cavity then the Reifenschweiler effect
would more likely be an increase in the decay rate
: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:53 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities!
If ZPE radiation is being upshifted in a cavity then the Reifenschweiler effect
would more likely be an increase in the decay rate, not a decrease. This is
because
Jones Beene wrote on Wed, 04 May 2011 06:54
[snip] Unlike many observers, I see the decay rate of the tritium in the Casimir
cavity (from the perspective of the tritium itself) as NOT changing !
[/snip]
Jones, I agree the rate is unchanged from the perspective of the tritium.. BUT
I think
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Wed, 04 May 2011 08:14:54 -0400:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Robin,
I had the same original displacement concept until recently
and I think it is roughly equivalent to the up shifted term Scott and
Thomas introduced me to. The issue with the
density, anomalous increases in C
transition time thru the cavity as measured externally and
Claims of variation of radioactive decay rates.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities!
mixent
Wed, 04 May 2011 00:28:40 -0700
In reply to francis 's message of Tue, 3 May 2011
was intended without
any nuclear consequences but there is also a possibility that a nuclear
reaction cannot be avoided as a book balancing type of reaction as proposed
by Jones Beene.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities!
Axil Axil
Mon, 02 May 2011 16:38:48
We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities! Re-Read the many posts by
Fran Roarty and me. This potentially explains transmutation and heat
production. Look at the patents by Modell and Haisch where they propose
circulating a gas through Casimir Cavities.
Scott
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011
*“We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities! Re-Read the many posts by
Fran Roarty and me.”*
What does this theory (Relativistic Casimir Cavities) say about the items
that interest me; the production rate of tritium if any, or the production
of U-233 from thorium-232 or PU-239 from U-238?
10 matches
Mail list logo
