Axil, Scott and I have collaborated and communicated at length regarding a Casimir theory based on relativistic contraction of the longer vacuum wavelengths which still appear full length to an observer inside the cavity instead of the present theory where the longerwavelengths are simply upshifted to higher frequency inside the cavity. We don't deny the possibility of nuclear reactions but feel they are subsequent to an energy rich ZPE reaction where fractional h2 is repeatedly rectified into fractional h1 in an asymmetrical motion where fh1 is unimpeded but fh2 opposes any change in energy density which discounts the amount of heat needed to disassociate the covalent bond. The h2 doesn't simply come to a stop because it has to obey constant motion of gas based on HUP [our ZPE connection]. There are other methods of extraction like Haisch and Moddel but my point is they all share this initiating environment where ZPE makes probable otherwise improbable nuclear reactions.
It may explain some oddities like changes in radioactive decay rates and perceived increase in C propagating through a cavity when measured outside the cavity and IMHO should work very much like the MAHG was intended without any nuclear consequences but there is also a possibility that a nuclear reaction cannot be avoided as a book balancing type of reaction as proposed by Jones Beene. Regards Fran Re: [Vo]:We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities! Axil Axil Mon, 02 May 2011 16:38:48 -0700 *"We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities! Re-Read the many posts by Fran Roarty and me."* What does this theory (Relativistic Casimir Cavities) say about the items that interest me; the production rate of tritium if any, or the production of U-233 from thorium-232 or PU-239 from U-238? How does this theory relate to other cold fusion reactions in general? Does this theory support the NI + H -> Cu reaction? Can this theory transmute 40 some odd elements from just H? Does it explain the consumption of 1 gram of H2 per day without leakage? On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Wm. Scott Smith <scott...@hotmail.com>wrote: > We have a theory: Relativistic Casimir Cavities! Re-Read the many posts > by Fran Roarty and me. This potentially explains transmutation and heat > production. Look at the patents by Modell and Haisch where they propose > circulating a gas through Casimir Cavities. > > Scott > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 16:13:20 -0400 > From: janap...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:Let us exercise some common sense in terms of dimensional > analysis. > > Let us exercise some common sense in terms of dimensional analysis. > > > > As revealed on the Rossi web site as follows: > > > > > > Dear Mr Mauro Rossi: > > 1- we consume about 1 gram of hydrogen in 24 hours > > 2- I never saw neutrons and neutrinos, with exception of few times, when I > saw neutrons, captured in bubble columns, but for a very particular > experiment I made by myself, being very dangerous. > > 3- No, I didn't. > > Warm regards, > > A.R. > > > > One gram of hydrogen per day is a HUGE amount of hydrogen inputted into a > closed system and consumed. > > > > Where could it all be going? > > > > If one hydrogen atom transmutes 1 nickel atom into copper that means about > 64 grams of copper would be transmuted every day. Since we know that there > is only 100 grams of nickel used in the Cat-E, the theory that nickel fusion > with hydrogen just does not add up. > > > > There are about 30 some odd elements transmuted in addition to copper > present in the Cat-E ash. Where did they come from and how are they formed? > > > > The theory that Rossi puts forward on what happens atomically in the Cat-E > just does not make sense. > > > > If the Cat-E can run for 6 months without shutdown, then about 180 grams of > hydrogen enter the Cat-E. Where does it all go? > > > > If the Cat-E can run for two years without shutdown, about 730 grams of > hydrogen enter the Cat-E. Where does it all go? > > > > Constrained by common sense, does anyone have a theory that can deal with > these facts that have been revealed by Rossi. > > > > Wouldn't the gas pressure rise in the reaction vessel over time if all that > hydrogen was fed into the Cat-E?
