Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-27 Thread Standing Bear
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:26, Mike Carrell wrote: Stephen wrote: Terry Blanton wrote: This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ Fascinating. Does anyone here know what the

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
Standing Bear wrote: When the oil runs out, we will go nuclear. There will be some civil problems as folks for and against the nuclear option 'interact', but the nuclear option will be excersized. All else remaining as it is, this would not do us a bit of good. Oil is only used for

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Grimer
At 02:28 pm 22-03-05 -0800, you wrote: This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ They have no wine. Time to wheel out the five water pots. 8-) Frank Grimer

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Terry Blanton wrote: This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ Fascinating. Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on global warming? Lack of oil will ruin the economy

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Horace Heffner
At 8:34 AM 3/23/5, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Terry Blanton wrote: This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ Fascinating. Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms wrote: I wonder why the article ignores the fact that deuterium is the only energy source that is in sufficient amount with a sufficiently high energy density? Actually, I believe the energy density and availability of uranium would be enough to produce all the energy we need for a

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Mike Carrell
Stephen wrote: Terry Blanton wrote: This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/ Fascinating. Does anyone here know what the effect of peak oil is likely to be on global warming? Lack

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-23 Thread Horace Heffner
At 11:29 AM 3/23/5, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: Research on runaway global warming, due to methane release and high altitude water vapor, is undervalued due to a type 2 error. Failing to asses the risk early enough has a catastrophically high negative value. The

Oil Crash

2005-03-22 Thread Terry Blanton
This article says that the Canadian Sands won't save us because you can't squeeze it out fast enough: http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: Oil Crash

2005-03-22 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:21 -0700: Hi, I wonder why the article ignores the fact that deuterium is the only energy source that is in sufficient amount with a sufficiently high energy density? What does it take to make this fact part of government policy?