At 11:53 PM 1/16/2012, you wrote:
I asked a close
friend (PhD physicist) and he said the same thing as Krivit; that fusion has
a *very* specific meaning *to a physicist*, and neutron capture is not
'fusion' as far as they're concerned. Now, if I was a physicist, I would
hope that I'd be more
At 08:54 PM 1/16/2012, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
For those not following LENR for more than about
the last year, the name Bockris might be
new. He did a considerable amount of excellent
LENR research in the 90s, and eventually faced
several ‘official’ inquiries at the insistence
of
Abd,
I only want to ask your opinion on the unexpectedly low gamma radiation.
Let's assume we have a nanowire (or nano-protrusion on a nano-particle)
with diameter of a few nanometers and (experimentally observed) carrying a
huge 10^11 [Amp/cm^2] current density.
Then would this nanowire be
From Mark:
...
Bockris states:
If I understand clearly what you say, you agree that some of
the work that has been going on may involve nuclear reactions,
Bockris wrote, but that it's not fusion. Is that what you said?
If it is, then I agree with it. Most of the condensed matter
4 matches
Mail list logo
