At 02:19 PM 8/1/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think there is good evidence for Rossi's claims. I hope that
Defkalion soon publishes good evidence for their claims, with more
rigorous professional reports than Rossi and Levi et al. have
produced so far. I do not think that any of the arguments
At 01:39 PM 8/1/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Andrea Selva
andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Michele, if you look at this
page http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3705report3.shtml scrolling
down just past 50% you can see a note and a picture of the
At 10:01 AM 8/1/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Something that has not been clarified here is that the flow rate is
rather slow; 120 ml/min. Before the water boils, when the liquid
overflows, It would take a long time to fill up the hose. There
would be a lot of water in there. Once it starts
At 10:01 AM 8/1/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Something that has not been clarified here is that the flow rate is
rather slow; 120 ml/min. Before the water boils, when the liquid
overflows, It would take a long time to fill up the hose. There
would be a lot of water in there. Once it starts
I wrote:
That's ~500 J/s. The flow rate is 2 g/s which takes 180 J to bring to boil,
leaving 320 J, which is enough to boil about half the water. The other half
would have to overflow unboiled. For the reasons given by Storms and me I
think this is unlikely.
That's wrong. I did not mean it
Anyway, the demonstration was unclear and there is not much point to trying
to analyze it in detail. I cannot understand why Rossi does not do a more
convincing test.
Oh, Jed, now even you are doubting!
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the demonstration was unclear and there is not much point to
trying to analyze it in detail. I cannot understand why Rossi does not do a
more convincing test.
Oh, Jed, now even you are doubting!
Sure. I have said this all along regarding
Another question. If his facility in Florida is plenty of fine working
devices, why bring people up to Italy just to see one ? Wouldn't be better
to arrange demos next to the factory ?
2011/8/1 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the
Andrea Selva wrote:
Another question. If his facility in Florida is plenty of fine working
devices, why bring people up to Italy just to see one ? Wouldn't be
better to arrange demos next to the factory ?
You would think so. I have no idea why he only invites people to Italy.
I can go to
Makes no sense is a word too strong. I guess you are leaning to think he
is a crank. Well, if you Jed, throw in the towel, I will do it too, since
you are a huge fan and supporter of LENR for over 20 years.
Does anyone know where the Florida factory is located? He would
respond that he does not want anyone to know...
this man must be a secret agent, I even wonder if *he* is real... ;-)
mic
2011/8/1 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Andrea Selva wrote:
Another question. If his facility in
Michele sez:
Does anyone know where the Florida factory is located?
He would respond that he does not want anyone to know...
this man must be a secret agent, I even wonder if *he*
is real... ;-)
I don't know if Michele was being serious about the secret agent bit
or not. The little smiley
Michele, if you look at this page
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3705report3.shtml scrolling down
just past 50% you can see a note and a picture of the factory location :)
andrea
2011/8/1 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com
Does anyone know where the Florida factory is
OK, not literally LOL, but that photo certainly got a chuckle out of me.
The Florida factory and Rossi's factory which was heated for two years
with a Rossi amplifier (and then sold before anyone else got to see it)
seem to me to share some significant characteristics.
Oh, and the
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Andrea Selva
andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Michele, if you look at this
page http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3705report3.shtml scrolling
down just past 50% you can see a note and a picture of the factory location
The address is from the state
LOL
I remember reading in JONP that he stated that the factory was way
off from the leonardocorp office... indeed he may be welding his
reactors in the garage under that building.
mic
2011/8/1 Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com:
Michele, if you look at this
page
Yeah, Rossi might even be a scammer, but Krivit made a very weak argument
there and it gives me doubts about the reliability of his report. I've had
neighbors whose (small) companies' offices were their own apartment.
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Makes no sense is a word too strong.
It makes no sense to me!
I guess you are leaning to think he is a crank.
I don't like the word crank. He is one of the most eccentric people I
know, and I know many eccentric people. (Come to think of it, a
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Oh, I see, only about Krivit's test. But I thought you'd like to go
visit Rossi even before that test.
Let me explain, briefly. Rossi invited me for a demonstration. We
discussed what it would consist of. I suggested he use a shorter hose
and a bucket to sparge the
Now some fun with cheap psychology ;-)
To explain some of Rossi's tactics look in his bio: he was a really
strong long distance runner.
Andrea Rossi spent at least 8 hours a day studying and playing sports
(athletics, Italian champion of road race in 1970, in 1969 the junior
world record of 24
On 2011-07-31 02:41, Harry Veeder wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/NET370.shtml
This was of interest to me:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3705report3.shtml
Rossi Goes to NASA
On July 14, Rossi met with members of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in
I must ask, Jed... What is your take on this?
Specifically, the NASA calculations:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3714appendixelectriconly.shtml
And Summary:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/NASA/18.jpg
I don't think that Curiosity Killed The E-Cat, but I'm finding in much
also from that page:
Adding 770W to 7kg/hr water flow will produce 3.7% vapour by mass, but
98.4% vapour by volume.
Harry
From: Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:46:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times #37 and Rossi
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
I must ask, Jed... What is your take on this?
Specifically, the NASA calculations:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3714appendixelectriconly.shtml
This begins with the statement Assume that the heat exchanger resistance
heater is
I wrote:
The demonstration Krivit observed was NOT a test, as I have said
repeatedly. Rossi told me in advance explicitly that it would not be a test.
Those were his very words! He says no more tests until October.
In some of the of the earlier tests they did make sure the reservoir was on
- Original Message -
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/NET370.shtml
Harry
Quite a lot to absorb!
The Randall Apx 1 :
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3706appendixa1.shtml
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/Randall-Steam-Water-Outflow-70.jpg
doesn't make
26 matches
Mail list logo
