- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14,
2005
The age of the Earth debate began with much shorter time scales.
Although Niagara
revtec at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14,
2005
The age of the Earth debate began
On Sunday 16 January 2005 07:27, Mark Jordan wrote:
On 15 Jan 2005 at 21:41, revtec wrote:
If the first part of the Bible is a fairy tale, then, how far into it
does the truth start? If the first part is a lie, then, the rest can't
be trusted either. The whole thing should be dumped in
Hi Jeff.
You write:
When I was fifteen years old, a local business backfilled an area to extend
a parking lot. They used ash from a coal fired power station to fill the
area to over 10 ft deep. At some time later, a 20 minute thunderstorm cut
an 8 ft deep gully through the semi-stable ash. I
revtec wrote:
and Harry Veeder replied;
Not necessarily. If the bible is the word of God, then the meaning of the
bible is almost as mysterious as God.
I don't see anything mysterious about it. It's a straight forward
account of a battle between good and evil.
revtec wrote:
Harry Veeder
If you want to be considered a scientist today, and you imagine
a different origin of man, you dare not express it or you will be
branded a simpleton or a quack.
Are you saying that the scientific establishment allows a scientist to
attend church so long as
On 15 Jan 2005 at 21:41, revtec wrote:
If the first part of the Bible is a fairy tale, then, how far into it does
the truth start? If the first part is a lie, then, the rest can't be
trusted either. The whole thing should be dumped in the trash and one
should sleep in on a Sunday morning.
never touched the question of origin. He left that extrapolation
entirely to our imaginations!
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005
The idea
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005
revtec at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe in variation and natural selection within the constraints
At 09:41 pm 15-01-05 -0500, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005
revtec at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe in variation and natural
[Original Message]
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Akira Kawasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1/14/2005 10:20:32 AM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Dec 05 Washington, DC
1. EARTHQUACKS: THE DEEPER MEANING OF THE TSUNAMI
11 matches
Mail list logo
