The question arises: If, as I claim, the opposition is weak and foolish, why
have they won every round of this fight? Why is there no funding for cold
fusion?
As I see it, human nature is the problem. Many people hate progress. Even
scientists. As Martin told me years ago: People do not want
At 04:36 PM 4/2/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
The original Mits Altair 8800 we built had only 256 bytes (yes bytes
not k) of RAM, and we later upgraded it to 1k.
Same as me.
We programmed it in
machine language by toggling in the instructions using a bay of
switches on the front control
At 05:32 PM 4/2/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Producing a controlled cold fusion reaction is impossible at
present, as far as I know, unless Mills or Rossi have they think they have.
Mills is seeing, he seems to claim, reliable results, but it's codeposition.
You
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Horace Heffner wrote:
[snip] The original Mits Altair 8800 we built had only 256 bytes
Same as me
Here is a side comment regarding the background of many commentators who
make their way to this list, in particular - and to the
Jed wrote:
snip
I assume that if Blacklight Power has anything, it must be fundamentally the
same as cold fusion. They don't want to hear that, but I am free to go on
assuming it. McKubre agrees with me, by the way.
- Jed
---
Mike McKubre should know better,
Jones Beene wrote:
I am not a sociologist but it might make a good study for one. This
is probably not coincidental. It probably has to do with going through an
age where the seemingly impossible in technology became reality in a
very short time, where rules were made to be broken and where
Mike Carrell wrote:
Mike McKubre should know better, and so should Jed. It is amusing that
members of each camp should claim each other's territory; it illustrates how
tightly one holds onto his pet ideas. LENR theorists try to shoehorn LENR
phenomena into Quantum Mechanics [as if that gives
It may be no coincidence that BLP signed a recent deal with a billion euro
Italian company (RadiciGroup) last week, and then widely publicized it in
Europe (more so than the six other deals) despite it being little more than
an agreement to do something in future if everyone agrees at that future
On Apr 3, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
I hope it is PC g. Usually generalizations of this kind smack of
bigotry,
but anyway...
Yep, it's the nerd thing. 8^)
A nerd and proud of it:
Horace Heffner
I wrote:
It is simple: I never give a free pass to any claim . . .
Lest anyone doubt this, let me remind readers here that I do not even give a
free pass to *myself*. That's gotta be some kind of record.
I spent hours, days, and weeks looking at the Patterson, Hydrodynamics, and
On Apr 3, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
I hope it is PC g. Usually generalizations of this kind smack of
bigotry,
but anyway...
Yep, it's the geek thing. 8^)
A geek and proud of it:
Horace Heffner
_http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Moretab1=Mediatab2=Displayid=
254_
(http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Moretab1=Mediatab2=Displayid=254)
Frank Znidarsic
Much meat for discussion here. I take Mills at face value without altering
it as 'he really means this or that' which blurs the issues. BLP and LENR
are new territory and neither theoretical structure is gospel. Mills, to his
credit, has produced a magnum opus addressing the major issues of
Jed,
I agree that these effects are all related for the same reasons
you state and that Arata supplies
the most compelling evidence. Your argument regarding this being fushion or
chemical and your reply
to Mike Carrel 50 kW for how long? How much energy? From what mass of
fuel?
14 matches
Mail list logo
