On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
If these things are true, then the tiny black holes that escape the local
magnets, especially when they are powered down, will eventually head for
the center of the earth.
Hence, falling objects. How would you
Is it in that experiment that the core take 40minutes to cool down?
in that case, if really disconnected from electricity, and still hot for 4
hours it is a proof that something else produce heat?
correct me.
2011/12/3 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
In the Oct. 6 test, which is the one in
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due to a
vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for recombination
of the ions and electrons.
On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
The second link gave me a VIRUS alert -- blocked by my system, but
take care
Hi Dave,
http://www.singtech.com/ VIRUS
http://www.singtech.com/pages/success.html VIRUS
Thanks for the warning. Could you be more specific about the message
How else do we know what the instruments said, but by recording them?
On Dec 3, 2011, at 16:06, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah. Depends on how much you trust that when Rossi says it's off, it's
really off. Remember the stable! stable!
Mary,
Do you have a link to the stable-stable movie. I like to see Rossi's tricks
in action.
G
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.comwrote:
How else do we know what the instruments said, but by recording them?
On Dec 3, 2011, at 16:06, Jed Rothwell
On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due
to a vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for
recombination of the ions and electrons. Electron recombination
I don't recall the name sorry. Somewhere in my AVG (free) / Firefox /
Noscript chain. I went back and didn't get the message -- AVG might have tagged
it to avoid multi-reporting. - Original Message -
Hi Dave,
http://www.singtech.com / VIRUS
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Electrical power was not continuosly recorded in most of rossi's tests.
In the Oct. 6 test, which is
Am 03.12.2011 22:14, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckertpeter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I believe there is a vacuum for these reasons:
1) I placed a charged needle 1-2 cm above a water surface. The air blow
makes a sharp, mm deep and mm wide hole into the water
OK, here's another approach as food for thought: the expanding CO2
can be channelled through a fluidic amplifier, with side jets drivin
piezo crystals at high frequencies. Multiple stage amplifiers can be
used to reduce electronic power input demand. Multiple power units
tuned out of
Thanks for checking!
On Dec 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
I don't recall the name sorry. Somewhere in my AVG (free) /
Firefox / Noscript chain.
I went back and didn't get the message -- AVG might have tagged it
to avoid multi-reporting.
Hi Dave,
http://www.singtech.com/
It seems that the UofB Press Office doesn't know its R's from its Elba.
I waded through Krivit again (and avoided the piles of M.Y. poop -- totally
off-topic, of course) to find :
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/01/university-of-bologna-clarifies-relationship-with-rossi/#comments
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvLUL8f4LU
http://amasci.com/freenrg/iontest.html
Best regards,
Horace
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made by others too and published in science
journals.
It must be seen that a strong current flows
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
The total amount supplied during the warm up phase is easily measured.
It is
the total amount of electricity supplied.
Maybe it's easily measured but in fact it wasn't
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
I see they missed the possibility the water is held together by
volume related *structural* changes. Incredible!
Am 03.12.2011 22:57, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvLUL8f4LU
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
We need more robust, long running, high output, credible experiments.
SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments for
20 years, albeit at low output.
Sorry, it took some time for me to get to it.
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/08/05/reviewing-ny-teknik-video-did-rossi-play-with-power-setting/
That's the whole discussion via Krivit's blog. The actual Youtube video is
here:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made by others too and published in
science
Am 03.12.2011 23:51, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Good idea, good article.
I disagree. Terrible idea, terrible article. Estimates are that $200 M has
been spent on cold fusion research in 22 years. If that's not enough to
generate unequivocal evidence of *heat* from nuclear
On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:36 AM, David ledin wrote:
Rob Duncan, vice chancellor of research at the University of Missouri
going to establish a national research program that would help
scientists study cold fusion .
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/dec/03/mu-research-chief-
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:51, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It should
deliver about 100µA.
Its a TV split diode flyback transformer driven by a selfbuild
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 22:57, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
OH no, I opened them, but did not get any kind of alert.
http://www.avgthreatlabs.com/sitereports/domain/singtech.com
30-day site report for: singtech.com
Currently Safe
No active threats were reported recently by users
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It
should deliver about 100µA.
Its a TV split diode
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments for 20
years, albeit at low output. Skeptics, the DoE and most of academia have
paid no attention to them.
McKubre (paraphrased): It's illegal to
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
BTW, you might enjoy checking the archives for posts by Bill Beaty on the
ability of HV needle tips to generate threads of water molecules from
humidity in the air. Some thread names I recall are Air threads and
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
BTW, you might enjoy checking the archives for posts by Bill Beaty on the
ability of HV needle tips to generate threads of water molecules from
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops! I should have read the whole air thread!
For those who might not know, Bill Beaty is our list owner. He has 56
science videos, 22,000 subscribers and 14 M viewings:
http://www.youtube.com/user/wbeaty?feature=watch
Am 04.12.2011 00:29, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy water experiments.
Very interesting are the Schlieren
Am 04.12.2011 01:16, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy water
From:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.html
David Swenson of 3M Corporation describes an anomaly where workers
encountered a strange invisible wall in the area under a fast-
moving sheet of electrically charged polypropelene film in a factory.
This invisible wall was strong enough to
On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy
Am 04.12.2011 01:41, schrieb Horace Heffner:
This is about the water bridge experiment, not Bill Beaty's water
thread experiments.
His fine threads extended multiple times the length of the water
bridge, and were sustained indefinitely, with orders of magnitude less
current. Read the
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. Terrible idea, terrible article. Estimates are that $200 M has
been spent on cold fusion research in 22 years. If that's not enough to
generate unequivocal evidence of *heat* from nuclear reactions in a
I think that wiki article should be frozen for a while. There should be
just basic information about the claim with _few_ *relevant* sources and
only _public_ tests in January and October should be discussed. I think
that three paragraph well written text should be enough.
I do not see the urge
On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 01:41, schrieb Horace Heffner:
This is about the water bridge experiment, not Bill Beaty's water
thread experiments.
His fine threads extended multiple times the length of the water
bridge, and were sustained indefinitely,
»break general relativity» [is suspect to Alain]
This is wrong statement. Because general relativity is known to be false
with infinite probability, because big bang was infinitely improbable event
in dynamic cosmos according GR. And we have observed in CMB that cosmos is
flat and this is
It's true that the QP and GR are incompatible at planck scale , and that is
the subject of quantum gravity research.
however about galaxy, dark matter and dark energy, seems more and more able
to explain the facts (better that modified gravity, according to recent
research). It raise chalenge in
I provided a unification of quantum physics that was derived as a condition of
cold fusion.
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/952
Frank Znidarsic
I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is
only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition.
note that about the law I talk about, GR, QP, TD1/2, I'm just very very
suspect about theory that assume a violation of that laws...
I know that in some
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Estimates are that $200 M has been spent on cold fusion research in 22
years.
Just out curiosity, how do we know that number? Has there been a study?
after defkalion who say they will install a webcam to show
an hyperion working
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=587
it seems that rossi agree too for a 24x7 show
http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/rossi-open-to-live-streaming-video-of-his-e-cat-technology/
Note to MY : I
My dear Friends,
It is my privilege to send you a young issue of my old newsletter:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/12/informavores-sunday-no-484.html
It seems our LENR adventure will continue:
- Idea of the week: LENR technology is much too important to remain a
monopol of anybody:
-
2011/12/3 Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de:
Am 03.12.2011 22:14, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckertpeter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
I believe there is a vacuum for these reasons:
1) I placed a charged needle 1-2 cm above a water surface. The air blow
51 matches
Mail list logo
