[Vo]:a paper needed for the paradigm shift in LENR

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/leonid-urutskoev-phenomenological-model.html A very important paper- I think, and new thinking- essential. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:a paper needed for the paradigm shift in LENR

In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:39:59 +0300: Hi, [snip] >http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/leonid-urutskoev-phenomenological-model.html >A very important paper- I think, and new thinking- essential. >Peter I have been afraid of this for 20 years. :( If this were the

Re: [Vo]:a paper needed for the paradigm shift in LENR

Like so much in this universe, it comes down to input, process, and output. The output from lenr can take many forms based on linkages in the process mechanism. These outputs include light, particles fragments, particle creation like muons and electrons, magnetism, RF, shock waves, heat, XUV and

Re: [Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

Frédéric Henry-Couannier is almost all the way toward correct thinking about the fundamental causation of LENR. Micro lightning balls (mlb), is the fundamental cause of LENR. But these electromagnetic solitons have already been discovered in nanoplasmonics. They are called by their scientific name

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

Hi, On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: j_l(|w|/c r)Ylm(e)exp(iwt), with e the spherical part of x, and r the > radial part. Here you are using spherical harmonics -- Ylm(e). These are implicitly disavowed by Mills, who offers instead the

[Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

My second publication today: a message, seemingly nasty, actually a must. And some Info, a part of it about nasty things again )our enemies) http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/09-oct-2015-in-lenr-do-not-idealize-real.html Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

> This may apply to the Lipinski/ Unified Gravity theory and experiments. This is the group that claims to have found a low energy window for lithium fusion - around 200 eV. Yes I think that my argument is independent on basic theory though and well aligned with sound basic physical intuition

RE: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe * * I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when discussing the recent notes from Louis DeChiaro. This may apply to the Lipinski/ Unified Gravity theory and

Re: [Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

The work of Leonid Urutskoev and D.V. Filippov on exploding titanium foils are formative to my understanding of the LENR reaction. One point that greatly impressed me seen in these experiments was the detection of the LENR reaction far from the plasma channel produced by the exploding foil. I call

Re: [Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

Peter Gluck wrote: Something strange has happened: Cold Fusion LENR was discovered in the PdD wet system- I called this a miscovery because the phenomena are presnt in many places in more forms- but PdD is probably the worst possible- difficult for study, not good at all for applications just

RE: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Ø This is a really good argument for not expecting the same radiation and would give an argument for why we don't see much of radiation in CF research. Maybe the energy is released through highly spinning entities or whatnot. Why not radiation through a EM

[Vo]:Re: LENR is many times more than PdD

Peter Gluck wrote: Something strange has happened: Cold Fusion LENR was discovered in the PdD wet system- I called this a miscovery because the phenomena are presnt in many places in more forms- but PdD is probably the worst possible- difficult for study, not good at all for applications just

Re: [Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

Like so much in LENR engineering, the key to success in LENR is the preparation of the surface of the substrate, Piantelli's nickel bars, Mizono electrodes, Rossi's nickel nanopowder, co-deposition of palladium hydride, all owe their success in achieving the LENR reaction to the proper preparation

Re: [Vo]:LENR is many times more than PdD

Axil Axil wrote: > Yes, now that this method is known, it is all so easy. But it took a long > time to learn what to do to get the LENR reaction to appear. > I think you are right that surface preparations are important. So is the initial choice of the material.

[Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when discussing the recent notes from Louis DeChiaro. The short story is that one of the factors that demand such high energies in standard theory is that any small