I think finally Rossi is ready for a COP of infinity! Just collect the
visible part with energy cells and input.
*solar collectors
ECAT QuarkX preliminary report
Report Disclaimer:
THIS IS NOT A THIRD PARTY REPORT AND ALL THE MEASUREMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE
BY ANDREA ROSSI AND HIS TEAM. THEREFORE THESE RESULTS CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AT ANY EFFECT OTHER THAN AN INTERNAL PROCESS CONTROL, NOTHING
MORE.
DESCRIPTION OF THE QUARK
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Can we get this Kowalski guy banned? This is pretty clearly spam.
>
It isn't Kowalski himself. It is a spam-bot sending spam with his return
address. We told him to change his e-mail address. That can be difficult as
you know.
- Jed
Is Particle Physics About to Crack?
This story appeared today on the Sci-Am blog.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/is-particle-physics-about-to-
crack-wide-open/
. but it can be (should be) read in the context of two other recent stories
in particle physics, all from last week -
It is just the first report, imagine what will you know on June 14,
2017
there are news too and the end of a never-ending toxic thread
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-14-2016-quark-x-little-lighthouse.html
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
"If the new kid’s name is SUSY, does that mean the her partner will be a
750 GEV fermion?"
I saw in an explanation that the particle must be a boson with spin 1
because it produces 2 photons with spin 1.
This means that the 750 particle is a force carrier, This particle could be
the particle
I should have explained that SUSY is short for supersymmetry.
Supersymmetry is a proposed type of spacetime symmetry that relates the basic
classes of elementary particles: bosons and fermions… thus the speculation that
there could be a fermion “relative” to the new boson which has special
Then there is SUSY.
If the new particle-x (and/or 5th force) and the LHC 750 GeV boson are
validated in some way, along with the Higgs, is the agglomeration of all of
these new findings the real 5th force, and not any constituent particle?
(and is it coincidental that the mass of 6 Higgs
Jed, Why do you say this? I am curious.
Ruby
On 6/14/16 11:27 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3350-NEWS-HOUSE-COMMITTEE-REQUIRES-LENR-BRIEFING-FROM-SECRETARY-OF-DEFENSE/
This couldn't come at a worse time.
- Jed
--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA
See:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3350-NEWS-HOUSE-COMMITTEE-REQUIRES-LENR-BRIEFING-FROM-SECRETARY-OF-DEFENSE/
This couldn't come at a worse time.
- Jed
Here is something worth thinking about in the context of why nickel could be
effective for creating a thermal anomaly (as seen in LENR) in the context of
supersymmetry and the 750 GeV “big-god” particle. (let’s call it the “BG” so as
not to offend). Admittedly, this takes SUSY to the extreme.
This is the best explanation I have seen so far. From MFMP
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1199701140060583
E-Cat X operating parameters claimed following recent test.
Whilst there is very little credible data shared in the 'report' on the
E-Cat X, information
From: Craig Brown
Agreed. The eCat is as dead as a short-sighted mouse who's just mistakenly
walked into a cats only nightclub during a time of extreme famine.
That much is true. Nevertheless, at least a portion of the broader range of
metal-hydride technology remains valid – which
Let's foucs now on QuarkX.
Imagine the basic 13 atom FCC quantum dot made of the isotope nickel 62. It
would have mass-energy of 751 GeV. This crystal is composed of atomic and
nuclear bosons (pure 62Ni).
Let’s assume that this particle has two potential identities – one being the
particle described above and the other
"ecatnews.com closes".Agreed. The eCat is as dead as a short-sighted mouse who's just mistakenly walked into a cats only nightclub during a time of extreme famine.
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:ecatnews.com closes
From: Jed Rothwell
Date: Wed, June 15,
See:
http://ecatnews.com/?p=2702
18 matches
Mail list logo