RE: [Vo]:Ukrainian Paper on the active particle of LENR

If Naudts is right then relativistic hydrogen could occupy the same spatial coordinates while offset on time axis. Fran -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 6:15 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Ukrainian

[Vo]:IH USES MEMES IN THE WAR WITH LEONARDO CORP.

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-28-2016-war-of-memes-in-lenr-land.html Not all memes succeed, not all survive, or prosper. Think about "Cold Fusion" it is meme but not happy. Is LENR a meme? That war of memes is an obstacle to its memefication-technologization Better stop the war and

[Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

I am just reporting this. Don't ask me what it means. I have no clue. "Defendants' reply in support of motion to dismiss" https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/678-D-E-19-Reply-In-Support-of-Motion-to-Dismiss-pdf/

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Sounds like the E-cat patent may be rejected ( see end of document) – independent of this. I am just reporting this. Don't ask me what it means. I have no clue. "Defendants' reply in support of motion to dismiss"

Re: [Vo]:IH USES MEMES IN THE WAR WITH LEONARDO CORP.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-28-2016-war-of-memes-in-lenr-land.html > > Not all memes succeed, not all survive, or prosper. > Think about "Cold Fusion" it is meme but not happy. Is LENR a meme? That >

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jones Beene wrote: > It should not surprise anyone who has followed the Rossi saga over the > years to learn that Gary Wright or Mary Yugo, etc. etc. could have fully > informed the Court of the Petrodragon details and the failed Army > contracts, etc. It is almost a

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: Is this not the old response of IH to Rossi's charge? Rossi has already > replied to it. > See > http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/28/rossi-responds-to-ihs-motion-to-dismiss-in-court-case/ > > I do not think so. This document was entered yesterday,

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Argument Clinic - Monty Python's The Flying Circus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y ​Harry​ On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > Is this not the old response of IH to Rossi's charge? Rossi has

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Is this not the old response of IH to Rossi's charge? Rossi has already replied to it. See http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/28/rossi-responds-to-ihs-motion-to-dismiss-in-court-case/

Re: [Vo]:Ukrainian Paper on the active particle of LENR

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:14:57 -0700: Hi, [snip] >-Original Message- > >>Since bosons can occupy the same place > >RVS: No they can't. They can occupy the same quantum state, that is not the >same thing as the same physical location. > >Robin, > >We have

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: >- not enough signatures, so a working MW reactor doesn’t matter. It >came too late. > > I.H. claims it does not work. If it worked, they would pay $89 million. Regardless of whether it actually works or not, Sifforkoll should not misrepresent

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

It seems this is a second effort by IH/Cherokee to dismiss Rossi's charges. Sifferkoll comments as follows. Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0019.0 It seems

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

From: Jed Rothwell * Whether the gadget works or not is a matter of fact that must be established by expert testimony. Perhaps, but will it get that far? Rossi’s claim could be dismissed on the issue of lack of signatures for the second amendment, or actually any of the 3 arguments in

Re: [Vo]:IH USES MEMES IN THE WAR WITH LEONARDO CORP.

Lol, wut?!? Do you mean, he shouldn't do anything? After all, it's not like Peter can hire or motivate a bunch of guys to go after Rossi. 2016-06-28 15:50 GMT-03:00 Che : > > > Why are you appealing to the morality of the parties involved, when > clearly only the

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Rossi’s past legal problems in Italy are probably not admissible in this case, that is true… although otherwise inadmissible evidence which shows a “pattern of conduct” can be admissible for that purpose… but that is not what I am talking about. Let’s focus on a dismissal of the complaint. The