Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jed, When you start with certainty that Rossi is a fraud all becomes clear to you. Someone will always come up with a scheme about how Rossi cheated on any test. Craig is right. Far better to leave the judgement to an unbiased expert. Even then some will doubt it, as we now see. It is

[Vo]:[Humor]Higgs Boson Pizza

http://home.cern/about/updates/2016/07/make-your-own-higgs-boson-pizza

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

On 07/05/2016 04:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield > wrote: Jed, When you start with certainty that Rossi is a fraud all becomes clear to you. I did not start with that idea. On the contrary, as you see in the quote from me

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Craig Haynie wrote: > If I were Rossi, what I would want is an independent evaluation of the > device, from which, neither side could dispute the results. > He did not do that. On the contrary, his test was a farce. It was as bad as his previous tests. Anyone with

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob, This is exactly the type of experiment I had in mind. Add about 10% LAD to the LAH and re-run the series of experiments to see how the XH compares to plain LAH. You are also correct that this may tell us a lot about what reaction is occurring. It has been held by many LENR researchers that

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Craig, I like your analysis. Therefore I think any statements in regards to technial,legal and moral status is very disturbing. Personal judgment based on the situation is just slander. I am not a betting man, but I think the odds are reversed. On Jul 4, 2016 20:13, "Craig Haynie"

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: Jed, When you start with certainty that Rossi is a fraud all becomes clear > to you. > I did not start with that idea. On the contrary, as you see in the quote from me ending Lewan's book, I started with the assumption that his claims are real. I now

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Stephen, I neither know nor care about the details of Jed's relationship with Rossi. I recall that he fell out with him some time ago. Jed maybe an expert but he wasn't there and is relying on second hand information, so it doesn't matter. He claims the instrumentation was bad/unsuitable

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jeds, "It is obvious IH were stalling for time. Do you really believe they could not find a customer in a year? They found a customer. Rossi rejected that customer in favor of his own pretend company." I've asked you for a reference to confirm what happened several times and you have not

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

So why did you make the claim if you don't know? On 7/5/2016 6:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield > wrote: I've asked you for a reference to confirm what happened several times and you have not answered it. Who was the

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: So why did you make the claim if you don't know? > I do know, but I have agreed not to discuss details which has not been made public by Rossi or I.H., so I cannot discuss specifics. If you would like to learn more, you must contact them. > On

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: > I've asked you for a reference to confirm what happened several times and > you have not answered it. > Who was the customer? > When was the offer? > What was the offer? > You need to ask Rossi or I.H. If Rossi responds, you may find he is not

[Vo]:a bit of LENR info, intense dispute

Noboy likes when his profession- chemical engineer, researcher technologist is calumniated and insulyrd especially by outsiders. And for very lowly reasons. http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/07/05-jul-2016-again-bit-of-lenr-info.html Best wishes, Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania