Stephen,
I’m not sure the E field is static. It could look more like electronic noise.
The inventor – Kumar - also has other patent apps which indicate the way he is
going.
20150108851 Photovoltaic systems with shaped high frequency electric pulses
At least one photovoltaic (PV) cell
Two slime jobs in New Scientist in response to this
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
From: Alain Sepeda
An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee on
armed services with
>From their video, it looks like they were trying to find a way to eliminate
electron recombination in the silicon lattice to improve efficiency. They
may be planning to do that with fields created with the pyroelectric
films. Since the typical delta T from front to back in the panel is 26C,
Unified field theory achieved: Unification of gravitation and electromagnetism
Dr C Y Lo July 2016
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
Unified field theory achieved: Unification of gravitation and electromagnet...
On the test of Newton's inverse square law and the
Sounds sort of reasonable.
But something comes to mind -- the E field they apply, as described,
doesn't do any work, as far as I can tell. It /just/ biases the cell.
IOW it's a static E field.
In particular, since there's no path for the charge to leave the
"plates" (front and back
The title of this discussion has a problem . . .
Anyway, the article is here:
http://rameznaam.com/2016/09/21/new-record-low-solar-price-in-abu-dhabi-costs-plunging-faster-than-expected/
It says:
The solar bid in Abu Dhabi is not just the cheapest solar power contract
ever signed – it’s the
An article on LENR, relative to U.S. House of Representatives committee on
armed services with reference to rossi, Larsen, open skepticism, open
curiosity...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/congress-cold-fusion-briefing-1.3772873
I launched a post for debate on lenr-forum
Axil,
I find that to vague to able to draw any conclusions. I'm sure you
recall many people complaining if all sorts of things because they lived
within a ten mile radius of a nuclear power plant.
It not at all clear precisely what the experimental set up was.
Presumably quite different from
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-22-2016-lenr-finding-essence-of-1mw.html
quite good info..
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> This brings to mind a local company (SF Bay) with an add-on product for
solar cells which they claim increases the power and efficiency. The
technology uses a pyroelectric coating for the cells and a feedback
mechanism.
To get an idea about how far the muon bubble extends away from the LENR
reaction, the zone of electrical interference would be the only currently
known method of detection.
ME356: "Emissions (RF, electrons and UV) during the test were so strong
that my control circuit was absolutely crazy even
It looks like an interesting technology. However, the real metric is not
in panel efficiency or system efficiency, it is total$/kWh. This has to
include the longevity of the panel. The total cost/kWh over the life of
the panel is its installed cost (+maintenance costs) amortized over the
life
"
*Please try to be logically consistent and if you contradict the story of
above, give proofs, not suppositions. OK?"The burden of proof is on Rossi.
He's the one making a bold assertion, and must therefore prove it. To date,
we have seen nothing that would prove this effect; though I think the
One trivial point -- if you're in free fall I don't think there is any
Rindler boundary. You're following a geodesic, and not "really"
accelerating.
You can't just apply SR in the curved spacetime around a gravitating
mass and get the right answer. In fact, while you certainly /can/ apply
>>You can't just apply SR in the curved spacetime around a gravitating mass and
>>get the right answer.
ah relativity "they" have done the math wrong
see: Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
Maths
Do you honestly believe that modern relativity theory takes Einstein's
conclusions from his original papers and just blindly uses them? What
kind of idiots do you take physicists to be, anyway?
The modern version of SR is based on tensor calculus with little or no
connection with Einstein's
I found a paper copy of this, and converted it.
Morrison, D.R.O. *Review of Cold Fusion.* in *8th World Hydrogen Energy
Conf*. 1990. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, 2540 Dole St.,
Holmes Hall 246, Honolulu, HI 96822
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MorrisonDRreviewofco.pdf
- Jed
If someone would like to proofread this to check for OCR errors, I would
appreciate it. I will send you the image file.
- Jed
Terry,
They seem to contradict themselves: elsewhere they claim “the Efficoat
technology” provides 15-20% improvement in power production from ordinary solar
panels over the course of a typical day.” This would lead one to believe that
the panels are coated.
If the coating is not on
very bad idiots.
one math error "they" make is highlighted at following link with lecturer
still teaching it in lecture to students-
Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
Maths contradiction in Einstein's
Here is the patent application – or one of them
https://www.google.com/patents/US20120216847
Abstract
A method to increase the efficiency of a solar cell comprises applying one of a
transparent pyroelectric film and a plurality of films in a stack on a front
surface of the solar cell
I have read Dr. McCulloch's book and find his theory interesting.
However, my training in RF gives me a different perspective on wave
phenomena that doesn't seem to match up with his theory. In his theory, he
drops out wavelengths of EM background radiation that would be filtered in
the
This brings to mind a local company (SF Bay) with an add-on product for solar
cells which they claim increases the power and efficiency. The technology uses
a pyroelectric coating for the cells and a feedback mechanism.
The company is UltraSolar. It has been mentioned before here, but it may
23 matches
Mail list logo