Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

Robin Wiki agrees that "quantum efficiency" is the ratio of the number of charge carriers (in the case of water that would be protons) which are collected by the solar cell, compared to the number of photons of a given energy incident on the solar cell. This is essentially what you said and

[Vo]:predictions 10 years ago..wrong so far

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA4mGmSV-y0

Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

To compare apples-to-apples - for approximating the optimal use of solar energy, whether it is solar-photovoltaic, or solar photoelectrochemical (hydrogen output) or both - here are some ballpark numbers which incorporate the new water splitting research of Yan, as reported in Nature. For the

Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

This is a shameful announcement. It makes the populace think there is a wonderful new energy technology. This is funding season and this is a tawdry example of scientific pandering. From: Jones Beene Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:36

RE: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

The quantum dots seem to me to be large coherent quantum systems—an entangled systems. LENR is a quantum dot system that allows the transfer of nuclear potential energy to phonic energy or energetic free electrons and/or conductive holes.The high temperature dots with strong lattice bonds

RE: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

Brian— You sound a bit cynical. It may be nothing more than fake news. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity? This is a shameful

[Vo]:LENR the echo site of the litigation

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-27-2017-lenr-7000-messages-at.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Fwd: predictions 10 years ago..wrong so far

-Original Message- From: Frank Znidarsic To: fznidarsic ; vortex-l Sent: Thu, Apr 27, 2017 8:26 pm Subject: Re: predictions 10 years ago..wrong so far For the first 8 years they got it wrong. No switch to coal No

[Vo]:Re: predictions 10 years ago..wrong so far

For the first 8 years they got it wrong. No switch to coal No running out of gasoline No US taking the lead on global warming and China following No advanced reactor technology going to China. Reactors advancing ahead of US in China -Original Message- From: Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:56:36 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Even a few grams per year, per person would be problematic... in a few >billion years . ...by which time the sun will turn into a red giant, and evaporate what's left of the oceans anyway. ;) Regards, Robin van

[Vo]:Phase transitions

https://phys.org/news/2017-04-theoretical-approach-non-equil ibrium-phase-transitions.html *Study offers new theoretical approach to describing non-equilibrium phase transitions breaking* A new and elegant take on Quantum Mechanics has arrived on the scene just in time to help explain how LENR