I did the same, using a water cooker, and got about 90% efficiency
assuming textbook heat to vaporize water.
I am a little worried though, about:
1) The, to my feeling, rather slow rate of vapor/steam escaping
Rossi's hose as seen in Krivits video
My water cooker is 1.5kW, Rossi's water cooker is
My take on it:
a) Old question, again : Is the eCat steam quality a problem?
Definitely not a problem
Kullander-Essen report, even if 100% liquid phase still 2x!
b) New question : Do you now think the eCat is Real or Fake?Definitely Fake
Probably Real
Can somebody explain me how,
it is likely a weak interaction involving neutrons, without fusion
could possibly gain energy? And where do these neutrons come from?
It looks like people are more skeptical on the claim 'cold fusion'
than on the claim that 'abra-ca-dabra' can actually do something.
Hello group,
I have a question, its not so important but it keeps bugging me.
In the movie
Heavy Watergate
Written by
Mallove, Rothwell Frank
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6562030534380820378
At min 4:24
John Maddox
Editor of Nature magazine
says: It [cold fusion] will remain dead
Hi Vortex-l eskimo's,
Anyone knows what happened with Les Case's energy catalyzer?
It seems to work in a similar way as Rossi's. Why did he not build the
1MW plant he was planning?
Is he still working on this? Anyone knows where? (what lab/company?)
Thanks,
Bastiaan.
Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:30:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:John Maddox, editor Nature magazine around 1989
Bastiaan Bergman bastiaan.berg...@gmail.com wrote:
At min 4:24
John Maddox
Editor of Nature magazine
says: It [cold fusion] will remain
A car running on 10kW electric from a cold fusion device connected to
a 5% efficient heat to electric converter (steam or bismut or
whatever) would spit out 200kW of waste heat, that is equivalent to 15
strong patio heaters. Are you really sure, Jed, we don't have to
worry?
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011
Why would you do it that way?
However you do it, it's hard to beat the 5-10%.
The point is that efficiency does matter.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bastiaan Bergman bastiaan.berg...@gmail.com wrote:
A car running on 10kW electric from a cold
Hi group,
As a physicist I feel obliged to spread the word on cold fusion and
explain what it is to the general public. In that attempt I wrote the
linked paper, please have a look and give me your blunt feedback. Also
please use the paper however you see fit.
http://bit.ly/cold-fusion
Thanks,
tnx Giancarlo, for pointing this out!
I think what this means is that he uses a separate bottle for
demonstrations versus his own testing. maybe he has a big bottle that is
hard to weight but more practical in daily operation? Maybe
the hydrogen is a red Herring all together?
the small amounts
All,
Thanks for your input, I updated the paper to incorporate most of your comments.
@Aussie Thanks;
@Peter I maintain that Rossi forced the current big breakthrough,
whether it is just an additive or not. I agree with you that it is
fair to mention Piantelli and Focardi as founders and
@Peter
As an aside, please let me know how do you interpret Focardi's declaration
that he does not know what Rossi's catayst is.
I think the obvious interpretation is that Rossi invented it, and didn't
tell Focardi. I think that's the official story anyway and I don't see
anthing wrong with that?
I like his theory, it may well be the process happening. Even if it
isn't entirely, it provides a good starting point for further
research. I also very much like his notion of other systems that may
show LENR processes already. Including failing Li-Ion batteries,
(natural) isotope fractionation
Hi group,
I'm excited to announce our newly formed non-profit organization to
the advancement of cold fusion.
We are planning an open catalyst project geared towards finding the
secret catalyst needed to achieve nuclear fusion in the solid state.
The plan is to use the power of the crowd to
the wrong tree.
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
Hi group,
I'm excited to announce our newly formed non-profit organization to
the advancement of cold fusion.
We are planning an open catalyst project geared towards finding the
secret catalyst needed to achieve
Materials and material preparation are the key to cold fusion. The hardest
part by far. You cannot use just any Ni material.
Exactly! That is why we want to engage the crowd! Because finding
exactly the right stuff may be a daunting task. Moreover, even if you
think you have found the right
Mary,
I'm looking into cooling, it won't be finished for the first version
though. You can't just stick the reactor in a bath as the top and
bottem of the reactor have things (eg electrical wires) sticking out
from them. My plan is to use a 'springy' kind of copper tube coil,
that sids around the
Gold cannot be made from lead though fusion, it would require fission.
There isn't much point making gold from platinum, I presume.
To make Cu out of Ni though the Rossi claimed scheme it would release
3.4 GWh of heat per produced kg of Copper, that's an entirely new form
of climate pollution!
I saw some good post from him. Can anyone place some pointers to
(possibly) bad stuff? I mean, under tha name and email address of
Aussie Guy.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am also new to this list. Been here for about 1 year. AG always
Anyone? I'm interested too...
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, John Milstone
john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
Last November, Sven Kullander promised a detailed isotopic analysis of the
ash from Rossi's E-Cat by Christmas. (http://ecatnews.com/?p=1416)
It's now well past
Jones,
Haven't been following long enough yet.
it is said that RM never actively pursues - or
mentions the so-called deuterino (reduced orbital deuterium species)
relates to potential weaponization.
How can Deuterino's be weaponized? And why Deuterino's specifically?
And why would one who
Cool! The first time they talked about me was 1810. ;-)
Not a fan of NET, but this seems to give a different view on it:
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/newenergytimes.com/
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
google's Ngram analyzes all digitized
given that thousands of scientists using billions of dollars in hydrogen
and metal-hydride research (fuel cells and storage) have not stumbled upon
E-Cat like processes for many years, I have to agree with you. unless, of
course, the un-scientific evidence of Rossi was wrong to begin with.
On Feb
There are reports decades before FP about cold fusion, Filimonenko Ivan
Stepanovich for example...
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
Over Christmas I met someone whilst out on a walk, got chatting, and
found
Looks good! I especially like the library, what software do you use for
that?
I would drop the /wordpres/ part of your url and I wouldn't worry to much
about themes. The theme of the day changes faster than you can keep up with
anyway. Content is king.
Cheers,
Bastiaan.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at
What experiment? Am I missing something?
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:08 AM, francis froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
If this experiment occurred in 2009 and resulted in radiation sickness and
transmuted elements at only 840 watts in I have to ask why it is only
becoming news now and why the news
Exactly! We should crowd-source the funding to get this going.
Or better, since nobody has money and everbody here has an opinion of how
to make it work, we should Crowd Science! That's what we aim for with
our crowd science project with the Peer Pressure.
Cheers,
Bastiaan.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012
Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century
Can some experienced guy tell us some history? Is John Huizenga the one who
headed the two DOE reviews (1989 and 1994)?
I remember reading that somewhere but can't find it anymore.
Has anybody read his book, is it good? I know most of you will
Jones,
I respect you too, but also disagree, :-)
Real fusion cannot occur without
substantial gamma radiation
What a nonsense is that? If you mean with real, established, then
ok. I think there is no principal reason for gamma and neutron
radiation in all fusion reactions (there is in plasma
And a copy of the paper can be found here :
http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric-pressure.pdf
On Mar 12, 2012 5:11 AM, Andre Blum andre_vor...@blums.nl wrote:
www.fusioncatalyst.org
Andre
On 03/11/2012 09:20 AM,
use the cheapest parts.
I think keeping it simple and low cost is one of the keys to successfully
replicating Rossi.
I wish Bill will consider converting this list into a forum format so that
we can share attachments and other files.
From: Bastiaan Bergman
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent
LEAST significant digit.
On Mar 16, 2012 2:48 AM, Xavier Luminous xavier.lumin...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Off the top of my head I'd like to mention that Benford's Law is
particularly good at rooting out cheaters. Basically, the most
significant digit from a sets of naturally occurring data
You were right, it was hard, very hard. In fact we needed zillions of
1 micron transistors to be able to make smaller ones.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
another malthusianst reasoning that will be proved false once again...
I was convinced in 85
Hi Group,
Just wanted to update you on my plans to replicate cold fusion claims,
see http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/2012/04/peer-pressure/
Cheers,
Bastiaan.
How easy is it really to get steam from 300 Watts only? The difference
between 12kW and 300W must be obvious, even for the naked eye.
And no reports on input power? Is it measured at the plug, before
whatever electronics he uses? Or at the input in the reactor? If the
latest and if that is
http://the-explorer.com/steven-chu-looks-at-lattice-assisted-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion/2011/3429583.html/
It *suggests* that Steven Chu was at the MIT meeting. But it clearly
*states* that he is looking at Cold Fusion. Anyone has a link
supporting the last claim?
Thanks!
Bastiaan.
Anyone interested in a local meetup to discuss LENR science, business,
advancements and gossip?
Anyone an idea who these professionals are who gave the input to the
European report? I think its a great step forward, bravo for those
individuals and their brave contribution!
- Bastiaan.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 09:46 AM 7/4/2012, Harry Veeder
Bob,
Thanks for sharing. As you know, but other vortexers might not know, I
am following roughly the same path. See also fusioncatalyst.org, if
you like to join this crowd science approach. In addition to
oxidation/reduction/melting cycles I believe carbon may play a role as
it is active in
Akira +1
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2012-07-17 17:56, Ron Kita wrote:
Not sure IF this was posted before:
http://www.e-catworld.com/**2012/07/brian-ahern-to-**announce-nanonickel-
We're proud to announce a new section on our website, the Fusion Base.
With Fusion Base we aim to collect information on all companies active
in the field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.
While the rest of us is arguing whether Cold Fusion can exist, may
exist or should exist, some people have
Can we discuss the content of this report?
Let me start with thanking our Italian and Swedish colleagues for this
detailed and comprehensive report, its a great report that deserves
detailed analysis and critical review. My perspective on the issue of
cold fusion, LENR or unknown energy source is
42 matches
Mail list logo
