At 06:13 PM 6/18/2011, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Rossi,
...
... For example, we had recently a fake journalist here who wrote
stupidities about the water in the steam: ...
I guess Rossi is still pissed off.
For many years, since I first started on-line conferencing
Rossi: About all the others, honestly, I do not care too much, they are
either
competitors, sometimes disguised as Research Laboratories anxious to
validate, fake journalists sent by the same, or just honest sceptic who
are not important for our market. Our universal credibility will come
from
Nick Palmer ni...@wynterwood.co.uk wrote:
He's certainly got a very bad case of Chris Tinsley's inventor's disease or
he's faking. His mention now of totally dry steam has clearly been made
because of Steve K's visit.. . .
Rossi does show some symptoms of that syndrome, but there is a
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
He [Rossi] could apologize. What would he lose if he did? Nothing that I can
see!
It would be out of character.
Yeah, just like Steven Kirvit could apologize for insinuating incompetency. lol.
Harry
At 01:57 PM 6/19/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Generally, what the record showed wasn't what some of the
participants thought. They were reacting to, not what had actually
been said, but how they had, themselves,
At 02:11 PM 6/19/2011, Harry Veeder wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
He [Rossi] could apologize. What would he lose if he did? Nothing
that I can
see!
It would be out of character.
Yeah, just like Steven Kirvit could apologize for insinuating
incompetency. lol.
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I found
this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=96cpage=1#comment-47000
Dear Paolo:
The 1 MW
On 2011-06-18 22:22, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I found
this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
It turns out that the 300 Energy Catalyzers ready for
From Rossi,
...
... For example, we had recently a fake journalist here who wrote
stupidities about the water in the steam: ...
I guess Rossi is still pissed off.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks=
On 11-06-18 04:22 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
I'm quite sure I'm playing his game by reporting this here, but I
found this message by Rossi on his blog of interest on many levels and
probably bound to generate many reactions:
* * *
http://www.spiraxsarco.com/resources/steam-engineering-tutorials.asp
Plenty of wiggle-room when you're dealing with steam !!!
Then earlier assertions that the steam was totally dry must have been
... I hate to use the word ... lies.
guess
Krivit's visit achieved
something!
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:sa...@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 3:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi: our reactors now produce a totally dry steam
On 11-06-18 04:22 PM, Akira
Rossi said:
We have 300 reactors in operation now in our factory, and we are making
exponential progress day by
day.
How do you say, damage control, in Italian? :-)
I just wanted to clarify one thing which was confusing to me... there are two
factories that are
being mentioned at this stage
If self-delusion has been operating, then the person would not be
aware of it, and hence feel truthful, not deceitful.
Naturally, any hidden defenses would be exposed only gradually.
This happens to everyone in some aspect of their lifetime evolution.
Release from delusions is tedious and
On 2011-06-19 00:58, Mark Iverson wrote:
Still, I think they are trying to save some face after this
recent breakthru of 'our reactors now produce a totally dry steam'. That
means that everyone,
including Krivit, who has been questioning them on this issue were spot on...
This is a bit of a
http://goo.gl/4hD3C
The mist seems to be mist right at the end of the black tube, hence
not a pure steam flow that exits invisibly from the tube and becomes
cooler visible mist in a few centimeters -- so is there any evidence
that the out flow right from the reactor is dry or damp steam?
On 2011-06-19 01:24, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Passerini stated on his 22passi blog that without the black cloth the
little steam plume was barely visible) of what I mean:
Sorry, I made a mistake. Actually, he wrote a few posts below the one
containing the video in the forum linked that without
17 matches
Mail list logo
