Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

2017-05-21 Thread David Roberson
proven experiment that demonstrates the conversion between these two quantities. Dave -Original Message- From: bobcook39923 <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, May 20, 2017 5:25 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second L

RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

2017-05-21 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
research…” “Regards, Marco” <<<<<<<< Those devices Marco refers to are nuclear magnetic resonance machines I believe. I did my own research on them in 1961. Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 2:26 PM

RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

2017-05-20 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
o.com> Sent: Sat, May 20, 2017 11:16 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law-- This is interesting thinking. The idea that angular momentum, linear momentum, and energy are "conserved" is a hypothesis created and supported (as I understand it) by observa

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

2017-05-20 Thread David Roberson
20, 2017 11:16 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law-- This is interesting thinking. The idea that angular momentum, linear momentum, and energy are "conserved" is a hypothesis created and supported (as I understand it) by observation, not by derivation ba

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

2017-05-20 Thread Bob Higgins
This is interesting thinking. The idea that angular momentum, linear momentum, and energy are "conserved" is a hypothesis created and supported (as I understand it) by observation, not by derivation based upon a fundamental principle. While it would be a violation of the hypothesis, trading