I remember reading the spec for the flow meter that was used. While it may
have had mechanical digit readings that were that coarse, the flow meter
has an available electronic option that provides a pulse for each turn of
the internal rotor which corresponds to about 1 liter of flow (again
David Roberson wrote:
Does your diagram show how the floating device in the system tank controls
> the intake water flowing into it?
Nope. I do not know why. Maybe the diagram is too abstract for this. Or it
is wrong . . . or it shows another version of the setup?
>
Peter Gluck wrote:
> Penon simply says flowmeter between JMP plant and E-Cats and anybody
> who has seen a plant knows ab ovo it MUST be immediately after the pump
> water flow measured, injected in the E-Cats
>
No, that is not what Penon says. Here is the circuit:
1
into it? There are a multitude of possible
connections. I am attempting to visualize exactly how this occurs.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 10:07 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Penon described the position o
Jones,
This seems a typical negative piece from you.
I'm not a lawyer but I understand there are other ways to get the ERV's
report entered as evidence, besides having Penon show up.
Why do you say Rossi would make a bad impression in court? Everyone who
has met him (IH excepted) say he is
Jed,
Penon simply says flowmeter between JMP plant and E-Cats and anybody
who has seen a plant knows ab ovo it MUST be immediately after the pump
water flow measured, injected in the E-Cats
on JONP Rossi said more times piping forms U flowmeter down- standard
engineering
you say- "many pumps,
Jed,
I thought you said earlier that you had the plumbing layout but were not
allowed to show it. If so, there should be no doubt about whether there
is U in the system.
AA
On 2/20/2017 8:41 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
There has been some discussion here about the position of the flow
meter
Speaking of Penon, or should I say the absence of Penon, has anyone
considered the rules of evidence in Federal Court for getting that ERV
report into evidence?
As it stands now, Penon - who is the supposed expert who collected the
data and wrote the report is unavailable to appear for
Jed
So changing "external plant" to "external tank" and changing "internal tank "
to "external tank" is correcting bad English... Uhhh okaayy ??
The internal tank was inside the E-Cat plant not the external one.
I'm not going to get drawn into childish bickering. I intend to wait from now
Stephen Cooke wrote:
Jed.. nice square bracketing.
>
As I said, that was added by Abd. I do not know where the original document
is in the lawsuit papers.
> What if we remove those... and assume the ERV's English is fine.
>
It isn't fine! It is difficult to
Peter Gluck wrote:
> Question: do yu have information from Rossi or you have the piping
> diagram of the plant showing clearly and exactly (as position) where
> in the gravity return pipe was placed the flowmeter?
>
This information is from Rossi! He uploaded these
Jed.. nice square bracketing.
What if we remove those... and assume the ERV's English is fine.
Have you considered the external tank could be located at the external plant
close to the condensor?
In fact everything we say is speculation and can be interpreted how we want
depending how we want
This was dicussed already twice but DeJavu is a reality (see
my blog today about the psychological phenomenon).
Question: do yu have information from Rossi or you have the piping
diagram of the plant showing clearly and exactly (as position) where
in the gravity return pipe was placed the
13 matches
Mail list logo