Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread noone noone
Can you tell us anything more about this replication of the Rossi system? What catalysts are they using? Would you please clarify what you mean by 800 watts per liter of powder? Do they have to have one liter of nickel powder in the reactor to produce 800 watts.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
noone noone wrote: Can you tell us anything more about this replication of the Rossi system? Brian Ahern. I don't know if we should call it a replication since he does not know what is in the Rossi cell. I guess we should call it another Ni-H system producing more power density than the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 02:22 PM 3/7/2011 Jed wrote Would you please clarify what you mean by 800 watts per liter of powder? Do they have to have one liter of nickel powder in the reactor to produce 800 watts. No, I think it is much less, but normalized to 1 L it would be ~800 W. I told him I think it would be a

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
On 3/7/2011 5:50 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: But how does that relate to Levi's February report that the size of the reaction chamber is 1L ... and gives bursts of 130KW ? Well . . . as I said, I guess you wouldn't call this a replication. I mean, it does not relate all that closely. But it is

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: But it is additional evidence that the Ni-H system can produce high temperatures and high power density. The only previous examples were Piantelli and Focardi. And Patterson! Which was also Ni and Pd. Closer to Ahern. High power density at low temperature. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-03-07 Thread Dennis
@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility I wrote: But it is additional evidence that the Ni-H system can produce high temperatures and high power density. The only previous examples were Piantelli and Focardi. And Patterson! Which was also Ni and Pd. Closer to Ahern. High power

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-02-22 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 05:38 PM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: His strategy might be reasonable. But a consequence of that strategy is that I'm not going to believe that Rossi is a demonstration of cold fusion. That's rather

Re: [Vo]:Rossi credibility

2011-02-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: I don't see why. For one thing, other researchers are not responsible for what Rossi claims, except perhaps Focardi. Levi is not a cold fusion research. Or he wasn't before Jan. 14. this isn't how politics works, Jed. It's how things would